OP
I don't know about being taken seriously. I had to keep from laughing. Where did he say he was, CA? Can they even get detachable mag guns in CA? Definitely smelled of a spoof. Too many goofs. Point Aim?Fake. And the troll wins because his video is being taken seriously by "gun guys."
Most people aren't aware of Islamville in York county. They are part of a nationwide network.
I partly just want to get in on this thread, but I also have to reject some of Greenfield's premise here. Sorry if someone else has already made these points; I'll go back back to scrolling wisely toward the end, as I've been advised.http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-rationing-society.html
Wow, just wow. Never thought about it all exactly like this.
Money quote:
When you listen to the larger message of the left, it is one of finity. We have a finite amount of planetary resources and domestic wealth. This finity represents a global and national crisis that has to be tackled with rationing mechanisms. We are all on a lifeboat and some of us are gobbling up more than their fair share of rations. Unless the rationers step forward, seize everyone's rations and pass out limited rations, then we are all doomed.
NK isn't a direct threat to the US and its "ruler" knows this. In a fight, they could easily be obliterated and he knows this too. The biggest weapon they have is putting us at odds with China. Normalizing relations would remove the threat and give him a much better position to rule from. It is hard to contemplate with the history of my entire lifetime (born 20 odd years after the Korean War) but an oddball approach might be best.And William Lind has a much different solution, which surprised me some, but one I couldn't dismiss.
I disagree. I read something the other day which made sense about the NorK's strategy. It's to have that one splinter that they could inflict upon us, or at least the valid threat of doing so, in retaliation for an Iraq-esque invasion to oust the regime. Saddam was all talk and didn't have anything real to hit back with. The NorKs now do--whether in ICBM form or other form.NK isn't a direct threat to the US
I agree.I disagree. I read something the other day which made sense about the NorK's strategy. It's to have that one splinter that they could inflict upon us, or at least the valid threat of doing so, in retaliation for an Iraq-esque invasion to oust the regime. Saddam was all talk and didn't have anything real to hit back with. The NorKs now do--whether in ICBM form or other form.
While they likely haven't perfected the technology to be a reliable threat on their behalf, there is still a growing chance that one of their firecrackers could actually work. Combine that with our less-than-perfect defense system (i.e. us being able to reliably 100% of the time shoot down an incoming missile), there's a small window of opportunity there. That, to me, is a threat. Compound all of this with the fact that they are *just* crazy enough to go through with it, and it's a credible threat. The other countries with nukes whom we don't necessarily approve of at least know to not point the nukes at us, or else...
Only if you've had your head under a rock for what, a decade? For the rest of us, it just confirms what we've come to suspect.Well that's depressing
Well at least YourNewsWire.com seems to be posting something useful...