Mobs of as many as 60 middle school teens

They get away with it because of their skin color, nothing new here.

Try and stop them, you’ll spend the rest of your days in prison.

Avoidance is the best policy, I feel for the people who live there and can’t move.

It will only get worse but guess what America, you’re too chicken to even dicuss matters let alone do something about it, you bought and paid for this mess, congratulations.
 
NCFubar said:
Okay, here’s a question ... that husband of the woman being attacked knock one or two of the middle schoolers wonky. Just what charges would he face since these are 12 year olds? As a white male going against a black female 12 year old ... I can see the headlines. What retaliation would he face from liberal media, special interest groups, etc?

These hooligans being of such a young age really have little fear of adults defending themselves ... then the authorities do very little if anything to address these actions ... heaven help the areas that these POS’s will be terrorizing when they hit 16 ... 17 ... 18 years old. Sad as it sounds somebody needs to grab a couple of them an pile-drive them into the pavement each time these adolescent flash mobs attack. Either the people would take back their neighborhoods or the Darwin theory might weed out a few before they graduate to worse types of attacks.

Personally ... wasp spray by the case!
Click to expand...


You heard the guy at the end....the victims lamenting what can be done to stop other victims from acting irrationally and someone getting hurt. The re-education has worked brilliantly, what can I do to avoid a confrontation so that the aggressors don't get hurt.......
 
  • Like
Reactions: SPM
Sounds like a job for fists like mature hams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SPM
All of this inside a Gated Community!
I say if the have names and faces, file charges against them, criminal and civil.
When they have to fork out money for bond and a lawyer, that will get attention.

Kimber Pepper Blaster II on the thugs.
 
2 questions:

1) Why wasn't wifey putting up a fight? Looked like she was just sitting there.

2) Why wasn't the husband stomping their butts?

It doesn't matter if the attackers are 8 or 80, I ain't letting nobody do that to me without fighting back.
 
Average height for a 13 year-old male is 5'3". Weight between 100 lbs. and 110 lbs. A pack of those with bad intent would be formidable, especially attacking women and children. I'm afraid I would show little mercy to these punks.
 
J R Green said:
It's a HOA neighborhood, No men allowed!

Also It appears to be a gated community, IT"S THEIR KIDS!
Click to expand...

Sounds like the school is outside the gate. So maybe some, likely not all of them live there though. He says they have talked to parents, my guess is those parents that do live there. Take it to the HOA and have those families shown the door IMO.
 
Button Pusher said:
All of this inside a Gated Community!
I say if the have names and faces, file charges against them, criminal and civil.
When they have to fork out money for bond and a lawyer, that will get attention.

Kimber Pepper Blaster II on the thugs.
Click to expand...

A gated community, Dear God don’t ask for ID, not only will they beat you senseless but you’ll lose your job. :p
 
Last edited:
Darkhorse said:
Don’t use a gun use a bow and arrow or sling slot
Click to expand...

My brother was stationed in Mosul and their base was strategically located in a low point with hills surrounding it. The yutes would throw rocks down onto them.

I sent a Care package. 1 Wrist Rocket, several spare bands, a couple tubs of paintballs (to identify the cretins later) and one container of ~5/16" stainless steel balls which my brother reported passed clean through plywood.

:cool:

Problem solved.
 
Last edited:
Couple points to make:

1. “Gated” neighborhood. HA! I always comment on how stupid that idea is. They get to own those streets (not public streets) at an incredible expense and get zero in return. Not even a little bit of security. The perimeters are hardly ever connected and all you gotta do is walk in while the gate slowly closes behind a car...like these punks did.

2. I didn’t see “60” kids in the video. While the punks are in the wrong 100%, I’m not going to inherently trust a rat-tailed guy who watches is wife get beat up through a cell phone screen about details of a situation.

3. Happens “every day?!” I find that hard to believe...at least not with some specific reason why it does/can happen with little to no police involvement. Maybe it has to do with that lame gate and limited police patrol authority inside a private grounds...I don’t know. But wild behavior like this doesn’t go on unchecked in white middle class suburbia. I’m sure its happened a few times, but I can’t seem to choke down the “every day” pill. I smell some exaggerated slant to make this story bleed a little better. Shields up, gentlemen—be on the look out for other false info.

4. For a few hundred dollars, this problem could be on a trajectory toward being solved via security cams. Then, when a real man steps up in that hood and introduces some punk to the road via a Zangief spinning pile driver, it’s all explained in the video; not in a crazed news headline.
 
Like many here, I would have zero tolerance for anyone attacking my wife.

There was a time when she could have made short work of the attackers. She achieved a Jeet Kun Do brown belt before she had to quit for health reasons. She had also studied Jiu Jitsu before we were married. There was a time when she could have seriously kicked my ass. Now she has a dialysis port in her abdomen.

She took a peek at the video last night. I assured her that that would never happen to her if I was present.
 
Not to defend the guy, but maybe he needed the video evidence. Lays the groundwork for future action. Here, honey, just let them beat on you a min. while I tape this. Take one for the team.
 
Since everyone is so concerned that the punks not be injured, I submit Super Soaker full of urine.

For “hurts enough to think twice”, I once again suggest a sling shot and ice cubes.
 
Jim1392 said:
My question is "where are the men in this neighborhood?" If you know they get out of school everyday at the same time and do this how about 8 or 10 MEN get some baseball bats, wait for them to start, and then take care of business. The reason they keep doing this is they have met no resistance.
Click to expand...

Western Civilization has generally emasculated men, feminized them, and taught them that violent protective masculinity is toxic.

Good times make weak mean. Weak men make bad times.

Where are the men? There are none in this neighborhood.

Remshooter said:
I am completely amazed that it has not been handled yet. There must be a totally different mindset in that community than how I was raised.
Click to expand...

I'm not. It's been going on for months - if anyone in that neighborhood was going to do something, they'd have done it by now.

In addition to the point above regarding the status of the Western Man, people in these United States have been indoctrinated to be wholly dependent on others for almost everything: food, information/education, and protection. We, the People are always, always, always Waiting for Superman.

In elections.

In natural and manmade disasters.

In social situations.

In almost every "problem" in the West, most always look to others to "fix it."
 
SPM said:
In addition to the point above regarding the status of the Western Man, people in these United States have been indoctrinated to be wholly dependent on others for almost everything: food, information/education, and protection. We, the People are always, always, always Waiting for Superman.

In elections.

In natural and manmade disasters.

In social situations.

In almost every "problem" in the West, most always look to others to "fix it."
Click to expand...

What's the government doing about this???
 
SPM said:
In almost every "problem" in the West, most always look to others to "fix it."
Click to expand...
Bailey Boat said:
What's the government doing about this???
Click to expand...
This goes back to the view that I've expressed previously, that some found objectionable. The people, themselves, need to be empowered to deal with things like this, not government. If we accept that the people can't grant to others that which they don't posses themselves, then the people have as much, if not more legitimacy and power to deal with these, and other, criminal situations as does the government.

Coupled with this is a strong community dynamic. There would be a severe social response putting pressure on these kids and their families for bad behavior.

Think back to earlier times in your own life, especially if you grew up in a small town. The kids would have been handled right then, right there, by community adults, not cops. Their parents would likely be embarrassed and punish them even harder. It is likely that some form of reparations would be made. If these things didn't happen, those responsible and their families would be ostracized and it would quickly be difficult to impossible for them to function in the community.

These kinds of problems aren't new. What's new, as in the last 100 years or so, is relying on some government and their enforcers to deal with it.
 
Bailey Boat said:
What's the government doing about this???
Click to expand...

Nothing. Nor are they likely to do anything.

But that doesn't stop people from waiting for them to "do something," which is entirely my point (and I thought you were talking about the neighborhood folks, so if I misunderstood, I apologise).
 
noway2 said:
This goes back to the view that I've expressed previously, that some found objectionable. The people, themselves, need to be empowered to deal with things like this, not government. If we accept that the people can't grant to others that which they don't posses themselves, then the people have as much, if not more legitimacy and power to deal with these, and other, criminal situations as does the government.

Coupled with this is a strong community dynamic. There would be a severe social response putting pressure on these kids and their families for bad behavior.

Think back to earlier times in your own life, especially if you grew up in a small town. The kids would have been handled right then, right there, by community adults, not cops. Their parents would likely be embarrassed and punish them even harder. It is likely that some form of reparations would be made. If these things didn't happen, those responsible and their families would be ostracized and it would quickly be difficult to impossible for them to function in the community.

These kinds of problems aren't new. What's new, as in the last 100 years or so, is relying on some government and their enforcers to deal with it.
Click to expand...
Except " the people" aren't smart enough to know what to do about this. I mean how many times right here has someone expressed the view that if someone assaults you you should be able to follow them home and kill them? And our members are at least as smart as the public at large.
 
noway2 said:
This goes back to the view that I've expressed previously, that some found objectionable. The people, themselves, need to be empowered to deal with things like this, not government. If we accept that the people can't grant to others that which they don't posses themselves, then the people have as much, if not more legitimacy and power to deal with these, and other, criminal situations as does the government.

Coupled with this is a strong community dynamic. There would be a severe social response putting pressure on these kids and their families for bad behavior.

Think back to earlier times in your own life, especially if you grew up in a small town. The kids would have been handled right then, right there, by community adults, not cops. Their parents would likely be embarrassed and punish them even harder. It is likely that some form of reparations would be made. If these things didn't happen, those responsible and their families would be ostracized and it would quickly be difficult to impossible for them to function in the community.

These kinds of problems aren't new. What's new, as in the last 100 years or so, is relying on some government and their enforcers to deal with it.
Click to expand...
SPM said:
Nothing. Nor are they likely to do anything.

But that doesn't stop people from waiting for them to "do something," which is entirely my point (and I thought you were talking about the neighborhood folks, so if I misunderstood, I apologise).
Click to expand...

It doesn’t happen that often, so easy to miss, but I think @Bailey Boat was making a funny.
 
J R Green said:
Except " the people" aren't smart enough to know what to do about this. I mean how many times right here has someone expressed the view that if someone assaults you you should be able to follow them home and kill them? And our members are at least as smart as the public at large.
Click to expand...

Dude, please. Government courts have said they can weed out candidates for law enforcement if they're too smart.....

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-court-ruled-you-can-be-too-smart-to-be-a-cop/5420630

They ain't looking for mental Titans....
 
noway2 said:
This goes back to the view that I've expressed previously, that some found objectionable. The people, themselves, need to be empowered to deal with things like this, not government. If we accept that the people can't grant to others that which they don't posses themselves, then the people have as much, if not more legitimacy and power to deal with these, and other, criminal situations as does the government.
Click to expand...

Are the people not empowered to deal with thugs and criminal behavior today?

Maybe we need to provide broader protection from civil claims by folks that are involved in criminal behavior. Would need to put a finer point on it, but you get the idea.
 
JimB said:
Are the people not empowered to deal with thugs and criminal behavior today?
Click to expand...
I would bet that if you took a survey the answer would be an overwhelming no. I would bet that most have been programmed to believe their primary, if not only, recourse is to call fuel a prayer.

Maybe we need to provide broader protection from civil claims by folks that are involved in criminal behavior. Would need to put a finer point on it, but you get the idea.
Click to expand...
You'll get no argument from me. Criminal activity should exempt you from any sort of civil claim.
 
SPM said:
Dude, please. Government courts have said they can weed out candidates for law enforcement if they're too smart.....

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-court-ruled-you-can-be-too-smart-to-be-a-cop/5420630

They ain't looking for mental Titans....
Click to expand...
Read the article. that has nothing to do with their fitness, it's all about them spending a lot of money on training to a demographic that isn't likely to stick around. Even then the other officers were required to have a slightly higher than normal I Q.

But hey, as long as it fits your narrative don't look too closely.
 
J R Green said:
Read the article. that has nothing to do with their fitness, it's all about them spending a lot of money on training to a demographic that isn't likely to stick around. Even then the other officers were required to have a slightly higher than normal I Q.

But hey, as long as it fits your narrative don't look too closely.
Click to expand...

I read it. Nothing substantiated the government's fear, it was just the argument used.

And since C is average, we're talking about the C+/B- crowd is the target. Again, no mental Titans.

Does make one wonder, what with all the wrong addresses, planting evidence, conspiring to charge someone with a crime, the straight to violence mentality of enough of the cop population to have affected public sentiment towards them maybe a few A and B students instead of the C+ standard might make a positive impact.
 
Climberman said:
It seems like similar things have already happened.....

sm3.jpg
Click to expand...



Can you imagine a dozen men lined up across the street with sticks and shields like Stick Man, advancing on the crowd of thugs slowly, while rhythmically beating their sticks against their shields? I bet the thugs would hightail it before anyone had to take a swing. Rinse and repeat, and they'll find a new neighborhood to terrorize.
 
Tailhunter said:
They get away with it because of their skin color, nothing new here.

Try and stop them, you’ll spend the rest of your days in prison.
Click to expand...

Or bankrupt, or both. Not only are criminals like this immune to everything due to their age/sex/race, they're also winners in the civil lawsuits. They've got nothing to lose and everything to gain.

I also think you guys may be being hard on Skippy (other than wearing his hat backwards). He probably knows he'll be crucified by the media and the 'legal system' and is powerless to change that. What about that video? Do we know it was shot by him, was he really standing there while his wife got beaten? Or was it taken by another housewife/non-combatant that was physically unable to do anything so do what they could to protect their friend/neighbor when the inevitable lawsuits start flying? The media LIES, all the freakin' time. Editing/taking things out of context/building a false narrative, who knows what's really going on. If we judge based on what they show us, we're the problem. We should know better and act accordingly.
 
SPM said:
Western Civilization has generally emasculated men, feminized them, and taught them that violent protective masculinity is toxic.

Good times make weak mean. Weak men make bad times.

Where are the men? There are none in this neighborhood.



I'm not. It's been going on for months - if anyone in that neighborhood was going to do something, they'd have done it by now.

In addition to the point above regarding the status of the Western Man, people in these United States have been indoctrinated to be wholly dependent on others for almost everything: food, information/education, and protection. We, the People are always, always, always Waiting for Superman.

In elections.

In natural and manmade disasters.

In social situations.

In almost every "problem" in the West, most always look to others to "fix it."
Click to expand...

Bailey Boat said:
What's the government doing about this???
Click to expand...

Fomenting even more of it.
 
This is what happens when kids are raised with no sense of discipline. Little Johnny and Suzy are never wrong and/or when they misbehave, no one steps in and tears their ass up.

Dangerous precedent. When the pre-teen/teen years come, Johnny and Suzy are allowed to go about rippin' and a tearin' with impunity. Later on, this leads to, "I'm robbing that guy of his money", "I'm taking that woman by force" or "He looked at me funny, so I'm beating him to death"....because I can / it's what I want and there won't be any consequences.

As for the guy whose wife got assaulted, I wasn't there. I didn't personally see him stand by while his wife was being beaten; maybe he did, maybe he didn't...I don't know for sure.

What I do know with 100% certainty, though, is how I feel about my wife. I care an awful lot about her and I believe it is my responsibility to protect her. I'm an easy going guy and most times, I'm pretty compassionate, but if my
wife is getting kicked, beaten or punched in the head, somebody's gonna die.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom