California duo charged with hate crime for defacing Black Lives Matter mural

georgel

georgel

Behind Every Blade of Grass
Charter Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
Joined
Dec 17, 2016
Messages
12,055
Location
em95gc
Rating - 100%
37   0   0
The twisted irony...

A California duo was charged with a hate crime for defacing a newly painted Black Lives Matter mural outside of a courthouse, officials announced Tuesday.


Nichole Anderson, 42, was filmed using a roller to cover part of the yellow letters with black paint on Saturday as her cohort, 53-year-old David Nelson, stood guard near the Wakefield Taylor Courthouse in Martinez, the Contra Costa District Attorney’s said.


As Anderson painted within the lines, allowing the letters “B” and “L” to remain visible, Nelson told onlookers: “we’re sick of this narrative.”


“The narrative of police brutality, the narrative of oppression, the narrative of racism,” Nelson declared. “It’s a lie.”

“I said no one wants Black Lives Matter here!” he added. “That’s what I said. All Lives Matter, you punk.”


The temporary mural, which a Martinez resident received a permit for, was completed the same day the alleged vandals struck, authorities said.


“The mural completed last weekend was a peaceful and powerful way to communicate the importance of Black lives in Contra Costa County and the country,” Contra Costa County District Attorney Diana Becton said in a statement.


“We must continue to elevate discussions and actually listen to one another in an effort to heal our community and country.”


Anderson and Nelson were charged with vandalism, violation of civil rights and possession of tools to commit vandalism of graffiti.



https://nypost.com/2020/07/07/california-duo-charged-with-hate-crime-for-defacing-blm-mural/
 
Last edited:
When will the artist travel to Chicago and NYC where they really have no idea that BLM given all the BL's that have been lost to BL on BL crime?
 
We talk about fools filming themselves doing various acts - another example here.
Is that, the video they shot, the only evidence?
 
Charging DA
1594163324669_jpg-1494353.JPG

wtf_PNG-1494356.JPG


To bad she can't charge those that are rioting, looting and burning that fast.

CD
 
I wonder if it would have been the same story if they painted over other graffiti that didn't have permit approval.
 
AR10ShooterinNC said:
Being charged and actually getting a conviction are two different things, if they get a good attorney, and can see case disappearing.
Click to expand...

But.. The fact is they WERE charged....by a person of a race that has been allowed to damage and destroy property freely at will recently.

This...IS the definition of racism and unfair, unequal treatment. Gonna charge them, charge ALL the others as well.
 
Thomas Chittum in Civil War 2.0.

Item 4: Watch for racially split juries. (The New York Times, "Two Trials Reflect City's Two
Worlds", March 24,1992,p. 12) If jurors begin to refuse to convict their co-ethnics, then our
progress towards basic social breakdown and Civil War II is accelerating. This will be one
of the most serious indicators that we're edging closer to a social earthquake and a
breakup along tribal fault lines. Some prominent blacks have already encouraged black
jurors to consider jury nullification. In a short piece in Harper's magazine, Paul Butler, a
black lawyer, said this about the hypothetical case of a black drug addict whom black
jurors know to be guilty of burglary of a "rich white family":

"For example, if the offense was committed to support a drug habit, I think there is a
moral case to be made for nullification, at least until such time as access to drug-
rehabilitation services are available to all." (Harper's Magazine, December, 1995,
adapted from Paul Butler's article" Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the
Criminal Justice System" in the Yale Law Journal)
Click to expand...

A race based prosecutor is little to no different than a race based jury.
 
Last edited:
Brian K said:
Official t-shirt of BLM.
Click to expand...
Anything connected to that movie will soon be considered racist.
Terry Crews, who played president hector elizondo camacho mountain dew, is a black man who publicly questions BLM and all the political motivation behind protesting over one dead career criminal who happens to be black but ignoring the thousands of black people who are killed every year in cities.
He is already hated by the left because he's pulling an Uncle Tom and not toeing the liberal line.
 
DrScaryGuy said:
Anything connected to that movie will soon be considered racist.
Terry Crews, who played president hector elizondo camacho mountain dew, is a black man who publicly questions BLM and all the political motivation behind protesting over one dead career criminal who happens to be black but ignoring the thousands of black people who are killed every year in cities.
He is already hated by the left because he's pulling an Uncle Tom and not toeing the liberal line.
Click to expand...
You have a man who works hard and made his own way in life to become successful. That's not the message some folks want to hear.
 
Hey Whitey, guess who’s going to be in deep trouble when we take over. Turn about is fair play, right?
 
OldNascar said:
Hey Whitey, guess who’s going to be in deep trouble when we take over. Turn about is fair play, right?
Click to expand...
This is passed off as a joke but the reality is look around and see all the stuff done as inclusion and diversity, all the trillions of dollars spent.

What has it bought this country ... ruination.
 
This one was pretty good too. Defund the police was changed to Defend the police.

Defend-the-Police-URBANMILWAUKEE-2.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom