Missouri couple point guns at protesters calling for St. Louis mayor to resign

Mr. M. was on Tucker tonight, against advice of his lawyer because they believe he will be indicted tomorrow.
He said the police officers were top cops, polite and really did not want to be there but had a job to do. They even let Mrs. M. take a photo to prove the rifle was surrendered per the warrant. She asked the officers to turn the backs on the camera so they would not face any heat from their department or DA.
 
Last edited:
Button Pusher said:
Mr. M. was on Tucker tonight, against advice of his lawyer because they believe he will be indicted tomorrow.
He said the police officers were top cops, polite and really did not want to be there but had a job to do. They even let Mrs. M. take a photo to prove the rifle was surrendered per the warrant. She asked the officers to turn the backs on the camera so they would not face any heat from their department or DA.
Click to expand...

they were allowed to prove the police wouldn’t violate any chain of custody of confiscated items? So generous. Maybe I’m missing something
 
My guess is the couple are smart enough lawyers to give the powers of the city all they demand and will win a big cash settlement for the abuses of their rights.
 
NCFubar said:
Wonder if the looney city attorney will make a “hate crime” out of it?
Click to expand...
BS
Their gate was knocked down, they had weapons for defensive use and didnt even use them. No one was hurt, just scared. BFD

I could see someone trying to use GATTOP, but, again, they were being encroached upon by a mob of people. ANd there is lots of evidence of this
 
Last edited:
HMP said:
BS
Their gate was knocked down, they had weapons for defensive use and didnt even use them. No one was hurt, just scared. BFD

I could see someone trying to use GATTOP, but, again, they were being encroached upon by a mob of people. ANd there is lots of evidence of this
Click to expand...
While it is secondhand info ... the “rest of the story” lends more to their self defense storyline. The couple’s general narrative is they were sitting on there patio Sunday afternoon having a drink when the crap started. The protesters broke in thru the community gate (not the couple’s). The protesters made threats ranging from property damage to physical assault of the couple ... they even supposedly threatened the couple’s dog. The couple went inside, armed themselves and came back out to protect their property. I do not have any problem with what they did ... but legally I wonder what the coming back out part and made comments will be spun as? If they had stayed inside and watched thru a window with guns in hand I think they’d have been golden.

Little offbeat idea ... what would have happened if they had rooftop paralegals and law clerks?:D
 
Last edited:
Button Pusher said:
...He said the police officers were top cops, polite and really did not want to be there but had a job to do. ...
Click to expand...
Did that job involve anything about defending the constitution?
As always, I don't advocate violence... but I also don't necessarily go boohooing when somebody does what they feel they have to do.
Top cops or not, i'd really like to know what the warrant was and how it was justifiable enough to get a judge's signature...
 
DrScaryGuy said:
Did that job involve anything about defending the constitution?
As always, I don't advocate violence... but I also don't necessarily go boohooing when somebody does what they feel they have to do.
Top cops or not, i'd really like to know what the warrant was and how it was justifiable enough to get a judge's signature...
Click to expand...
They had a warrant. Warrants are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.
 
OldNascar said:
Anybody seen a statement or action taken by the NRA concerning the couples defense. Talk about a missed opportunity for popularity gain.
Click to expand...


As a Life member of the NRA I ask, surely you jest! What would Laperiere stand to gain?

Of course I am being sarcastic. It makes me sick that the NRA I grew up with is now nothing more than an extension of which ever politico can get them more money.
 
OldNascar said:
Anybody seen a statement or action taken by the NRA concerning the couples defense. Talk about a missed opportunity for popularity gain.
Click to expand...
Much like BLM is a fundraising wing of the democrats the NRA is the same for the Republicans. They serve no purpose but fear mongering and money for politicians.
 
nonsense.
Mustve been all the pressure from the left and the locals folded like a bath towel
 
normally i would think frivolous indictment to grab headlines... in the current polarized planet he could get the death penalty!
 
NCFubar said:
And the city attorney has offer the couple a diversion program option so they will not have to go to trial or have a conviction on their record ... she “seems” sure they’ll be convicted OR is talking out of her ass. Good thing is the couple and their attorney both say no way to the deal.
Click to expand...
LOL she offered them a deal, that’s rich right there!!! I hope this [woman] is destroyed legally and politically for this BS.

A poetic ending would be the state BAR revoking her license while reminding her of the oath she took and the meaning behind lady justice.
FB60CF5F-5674-483E-A698-B3E27DC95270.jpeg
 
Superficially, this just strikes me as the logical consequence of having a public (and many privates) school structure for 30+ years where it has been policy to punish the person defending themselves aka "The Person Who Retaliates." B.F. Skinner would be proud of our conditioning. :(
 
Local DA appointed by Soros knew that the AG will intervene so another leftist plan to make dismissing the charges a local election issue.
 
Last edited:
BigWaylon said:
In case anybody missed it...

The AG is moving to dismiss the charges:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/missouri...rges-against-couple-who-pointed-guns-at-crowd

The Governor plans to pardon them anyway:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/missouri-mike-parson-mccloskeys-st-louis-pardon-prosecutor
Click to expand...
I would not want the AG to get the charges dismissed ... go to trial! Their not hurting for money (plus possible suit ... some form of wrongful prosecution or such) plus their attorney is doing this for headlines so he’ll be going for the city attorney’s throat all resources ahead. If somehow and miracle the city attorney stacks the jury you have the Governor’s pardon as your ace in the hole. That’s just my thoughts but it ain’t my ass sitting at the defense table.
 
NCFubar said:
I would not want the AG to get the charges dismissed ... go to trial! Their not hurting for money (plus possible suit ... some form of wrongful prosecution or such) plus their attorney is doing this for headlines so he’ll be going for the city attorney’s throat all resources ahead. If somehow and miracle the city attorney stacks the jury you have the Governor’s pardon as your ace in the hole. That’s just my thoughts but it ain’t my ass sitting at the defense table.
Click to expand...

This. Make the DA take it to the bitter end.
 
MikeDawg46L said:
And keep a tally of the expenses to the taxpayer and plaster it all over the place until she is defeated by election or removed from office.
Click to expand...
But the problem is she is the city attorney in a St. Louis city elected position. The demographics of the city are over 45% black along with about another 10% being other minorities so her being a liberal black female means you’d have to really have a hard time rallying enough “Straight Ticket Dems” to vote her out of office in the upcoming election ... especially after she stands up for the peaceful social justices seekers who were terrorized by some rich white people ... no matter the cost. Liberal St. Louis almost has fairly conservative Missouri by the ‘nads ... almost ... not yet but it’s coming.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom