UNC ANTIFA

He's also apparently the only dumbass without a mag

Look Mr. Operator, you sir need to understand OPSEC.

And i quote:

Operations security (OPSEC) is a process that identifies critical information to determine if friendly actions can be observed by enemy intelligence, determines if information obtained by adversaries could be interpreted to be useful to them, and then executes selected measures that eliminate or reduce adversary exploitation of friendly critical information.

Keep your mouth shut. Lol
 
WOW, is that guy to the right really sagging a pair of BDU's? Maybe they're just too big for him.
 
Isn't that the guy who scared the guy in Charlottesville right before he plowed into the crowd?

You know - the psychotic guy who obviously didn't respond well to a rifle in his face?
 
Isn't that the guy who scared the guy in Charlottesville right before he plowed into the crowd?

You know - the psychotic guy who obviously didn't respond well to a rifle in his face?
He even admits that on the Facebook picture that is in the article.
 
So the conservative/libertarian voice of UNC Chapel Hill called the AR the guy is carrying an assault rifle?

Language is important, and when we talk about guns using the anti’s terms, we subconsciously validate their nonsense.

As the the subject of the article- UNC is a hotbed of leftist ideology. Has been for a while. So continue to send your children there, continue to go to the games and buy the merch. Continue with March Madness and all that stuff.

But stop being shocked when you send your kids to Caesar and they come back as Romans.
 
Glad to know we have level headed educators in our universities.
Wonder how he would feel about us advocating violence against his political beliefs? Clearly that is acceptable these days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
As someone mentioned in the comments to that article, doesn't GATTOP make one a prohibited person?
 
Same guy who open carried a rifle at the Durham fake protest.
https://www.heraldsun.com/news/local/crime/article199048869.html

Shame that he has an ANTIFA mindset. He would otherwise be a good 2A advocate.

That is the whole point of the 2ndA. Defending ones self from the government. This article should be used as a uplifting event.

We now have left and right political spectrum getting armed. From my pov this is good all the way around the table and for each segment of Americans.
 
That is the whole point of the 2ndA. Defending ones self from the government. This article should be used as a uplifting event.

We now have left and right political spectrum getting armed. From my pov this is good all the way around the table and for each segment of Americans.

Were these AntiFa types arming themselves to resist the power of government, I would be inclined to agree.

But they’re not.

They’re arming themselves not to resist power, but to wield it........over their fellow Citizens with whom they disagree politically - and that is not the same thing.

Professor Wehrmacht Hat didn’t go to Charlottesville or Durham to resist police enforcing unconstitutional laws, or soldiers pushing a coup.

He went there to confront his fellow American, in a place and at a time that no shooting war yet exists between factions of We, the People.

Given the divides politically, socially, philosophically - hell, even morally and culturally - I see these as dangerous omens of a time rapidly approaching when the history of our Republic will be entering a more dynamic stage.
 
Last edited:
Were these AntiFa types arming themselves to resist the power of government, I would be inclined to agree.

But they’re not.

They’re arming themselves not to resist power, but to wield it........over their fellow Citizens with whom they disagree politically - and that is not the same thing.

Professor Wehrmacht Hat didn’t go to Charlottesville or Durham to resist police enforcing unconstitutional laws, or soldiers pushing a coup.

He went there to confront his fellow American, in a place and at a time that no shooting war yet exists between factions of We, the People.

Given the divides politically, socially, philosophically - hell, even morally and culturally - I see these as dangerous omens of a time rapidly approaching when the history of our Republic will be entering a more dynamic stage.

We the people are the government.

Your shift in who is who is the flaw in most people within the armed patriot mindset like you.

The dips shits in office reflect the majority of voters who did vote. The employees of "the government" are our neighbors.

"The government" is not a unknown faceless thing.
 
Last edited:
We the people are the government.

Your shift in who is who is the flaw in most people within the armed patriot mindset like you.

The dips shits in office reflect the majority of voters who did vote. The employees of "the government" are our neighbors.

"The government" is not a unknown faceless thing.

J, I don't disagree with you, but I think SPM's point still stands. This guy didn't get all armed up because he was worried the police/military/politicians were going to oppress people He went there so he could do the oppressing. So that anyone who disagreed with him he could intimidate with his weapons. He went there to make sure that he could act to hush people where the 1st amendment prevents the "government" from doing so.
 
@B00ger

Agree to a point upon our split hair.

The system works, his display of arms, mindset and actions directly identify him as who he is. That's all any of us need that are tuned into or environment.

At the same time who here on CSF wants to disarm him? I bet i can find a FUDD gif to label that person with.
 
@B00ger

Agree to a point upon our split hair.

The system works, his display of arms, mindset and actions directly identify him as who he is. That's all any of us need that are tuned into or environment.

At the same time who here on CSF wants to disarm him? I bet i can find a FUDD gif to label that person with.

Disarm him? Hehe...nah...he is a perfect poster boy for why many of us here train and get the firearms we do.
 
J, I don't disagree with you, but I think SPM's point still stands. This guy didn't get all armed up because he was worried the police/military/politicians were going to oppress people He went there so he could do the oppressing. So that anyone who disagreed with him he could intimidate with his weapons. He went there to make sure that he could act to hush people where the 1st amendment prevents the "government" from doing so.
Wow, your description really sounds like he’s someone with a very fascist mindset.

Fascist mindset....AntiFa....hmmmm, the irony.
 
All of these antifa nuts are just communists and anarchists. Even if they got their way, I don't think they'd ever be satisfied with the country. They're the sort that want a perpetual revolution, where society is in a constant purity spiral to weed out those not loyal to the party or to their ideals.

Antifa sees their struggle as once against the govt and the status quo, but they're not going after govt agents. They're trying to elicit change by intimidating and attacking the citizens who disagree with them.

A right wing person who did the things these antifa thugs do would be unemployable, if not in jail already. Yeah, its their right to arm to protect themselves. The problem is that that they see us as their enemy. If they continue the way they are, things are eventually going to get really bloody.
 
Wow, your description really sounds like he’s someone with a very fascist mindset.

Fascist mindset....AntiFa....hmmmm, the irony.

They don't even know enough about history to understand the differences. It's like a billboard I saw that had "GOP" with the Soviet hammer and sickle as the "G" and the "P" in a block Cyrillic-like form.

Ironic, and hilarious. I would bet the first time he was seriously challenged he would pee himself. He's nothing but a bully.
 
if not in jail already

Noted, and so true, as follows:

He brought a semi-automatic rifle to a rumored KKK rally. Here’s why he got off.
A man arrested for bringing a semi-automatic rifle to a KKK counterprotest last summer had his case dismissed Thursday when a judge ruled the charge was unconstitutional.

District Court Judge James T. Hill dismissed the charge after Dixon’s attorney, Scott Holmes, argued the law was overly broad and infringed upon the the First and Second Amendments rights to assemble and to bear arms.

“It is just unconstitutional on its face, and the state can’t use it to prosecute my client,” Holmes said in court.

https://www.heraldsun.com/news/local/crime/article199048869.html

There's a Fundamental difference between this,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and this

Principle,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Against Everything, For Nothing

Principle.jpgredneckrevolt.png
 
Last edited:
We the people are the government.

Your shift in who is who is the flaw in most people within the armed patriot mindset like you.

The dips shits in office reflect the majority of voters who did vote. The employees of "the government" are our neighbors.

"The government" is not a unknown faceless thing.

The People are supposed to be the government.

It has not been so in a very long time.

The elected portions of the government are the minority, the show part that maintains the illusion that We, the People still have an actual voice. But the tens of thousands of government workers who do the day to day business of government are not subject to the Will of the People, either in the affirmative or otherwise. It continues to lumber along, growing fat on the fruits of the Labor of the People, grossly wasteful, inefficient, without purpose or compassion.

We were more represented in Parliament in the 1760s and 70s than we are now in the halls of Congress.
 
I know, right? Shocking!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I remember back a few years ago when these turds first started getting some public notoriety. Just looking at their pages on social media and quotes from them and the things they were doing, like disrupting peaceful conferences etc.

It clicked in my head then that their shouting down and oppression of anyone opposed to their view was the very thing they were supposed to be against.

Oh well. Mostly just cannon fodder if “it” ever goes down, as they say.
 
The People are supposed to be the government.

It has not been so in a very long time.

The elected portions of the government are the minority, the show part that maintains the illusion that We, the People still have an actual voice. But the tens of thousands of government workers who do the day to day business of government are not subject to the Will of the People, either in the affirmative or otherwise. It continues to lumber along, growing fat on the fruits of the Labor of the People, grossly wasteful, inefficient, without purpose or compassion.

We were more represented in Parliament in the 1760s and 70s than we are now in the halls of Congress.

I agree 50% of the way with this post.

Where i take a turn is i do not see the separation as a them, us. I see it as a lazy us who are too self absorbed to give a shit.

As we get older and more mental time on our hands "brain power freedup due to older children, work performance and such" we get left wondering what the hell happened and what the hell is going on?

Its our fault 100%. Same as any late 40's to mid sixty's aged Americans fault the AWB passed under Clinton.

Lazyness and too self absorbed to care.
 
Back
Top Bottom