2A: Darth Beto: Winning Friends & Influencing People

It's of no surprise in lieu of recent tragic shootings that briefly ( disappointing ) the focus was on why people do such things and then the focus has been back to Dis-Arming America.

Seems both sides agree we have a "people problem" and it's not being discussed in earnest as MSM & DNC have shifted back to solely on taking guns away.

Many of the Dem candidates for POTUS are calling for the same, give gov't your guns.

Two issues with that;
1) It's not helping the individuates that need help
2) America is the only nation on this Earth with a positive statement for and of "ARMS" ownership, The 2nd Amendment.

Seems to me that ( while she's a Dem ) Tulsi Gabbard is the only one running for POTUS has a normal / logical message ( at this point ) on all the relevant issues and perhaps that's why The DNC voted her Off The Island.

Personally I don't believe Beto will be in the final running for POTUS.

I do believe the DNC is using Beto as a "Lightning Rod" or a "Crash Test Dummy" to keep an illegal scheme for "ARMS" confiscation alive in the MSM to "Massage" the public at large and gauge public ( perceived ?) reaction for the purpose of "Fine Tuning ?" a message for taking firearms later when a front running emerges.
If the Left takes The Oval Office, Darth Beto will be taken care of for being a "Team ?" player.

The phrase used predominantly by The Left & MSM is , "weapons of war."
Frankly, personally I find that phrase somewhat distributing because I never think that I have "weapons of war" and have no desire to go to war, period.

However, since the Left wants to promote and push this "Weapons of War" language, when the 2nd Amendment was carefully written, the word "Arms" meant and still means exactly that, "Weapons of War" because that's the only reason we have the 2nd Amendment, being to fight enemies foreign & domestic.
There was no secondary reason, I.E. hunting animals for food, Simple As That.



SO:
B2B = Back 2 Basics

In the vid below, the following info is between Time Stamp 19:00 to 35:45.

All aspects are broken down, explained, and put back together, very clearly, no smoking mirrors

Prefatory Clause & Operative Clause: TS 19:00 to TS 35:45

Prefatory Clause announces a purpose

Operative Clause announces the resolution or action to be taken or not taken






Darth Beto

I wouldn't be at all surprised to see Biden, if he's the last one standing, pick Beto for a running mate. They seem to counter balance the campaigning. Mote Beto speaking, Biden just shmoozing, less stumbling.

The other candidates look like they should be running for city council.

I just want to point out that a 1903 Springfield bolt action rifle is a weapon of war.

Weapons with a military purpose are those most protected by the 2nd. One of the few things SCOTUS has even said on the rare occasion it takes up the 2nd.

The communists know that they have to have a monopoly of force against the people in order to take over. That is their objective. Sadly, I’m sure this conversation has been had in the past in other countries.

Beta O’dork is just a useful idiot.

In fact we pay way too much attention to him.

noway2 said:

Beta O’dork is just a useful idiot.

Click to expand...

A Willing Player, Useful Weather Vane or Canary in the Coal mine, if you will, to explore how far The Socialist can push a "Forced Gun ~ Arms" confiscation onto the American public with acceptance.
The main players fully know that as our U.S. Constitution currently stands, (not being amended ), a forced Arms confiscation would be illegal, simple as that, and such an event would be much easier if The Dark Side can convince enough of the public that the 2A doesn't matter anymore.

noway2 said:

In fact we pay way too much attention to him.

Click to expand...

Yes & No.
The Socialist are watching Beto & the public for reasons I've already shared.
Frankly, I'm bothered by how many actually applaud giving up the 2A with the assumption or False Belief that the Left would stop at the 2A in completely stripping the rest of our Rights to, nothing.


I would like to point out that when "O" was signing Obamacare into Law(?) that "O" ~Biden as well as many others fully realized that the law or parts of it ( key parts ?) were Not constitutional.
Thus, Biden's commit to "O" because they fooled ~ pushed through legislation that should never have made it out of either the House or Senate.
Also, it was never primarily about us Americans, rather the medical market futures, insider trading, etc, etc.

Biden to Obama: 'A Big F-ing Deal'

IMO Beto's one and only role in the current democrat clown car is to make Warren look more moderate.