2A: "Lot Lizard" Harris Boast Using Unconstitutional Exec Order to Ban Guns

YeeHaa

Member
Charter Life Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2016
Messages
6,760
Location
T'ville ~ Trinity
Rating - 100%
8   0   0
TS 1:17
Kamala Harris replied to Joe Biden's claim that her proposed exec order would be unconstitutional by *laughing* and blithely saying "instead of saying no we can't, how about yes we can"



Harris has has demonstrated a total lack of proper decorum thru out this debate(?) process.

I can not even to start to imagine her as POTUS and dealing with foreign dignitaries, heads of state, etc, properly.

She comes across as a "Party Girl", "Honey Pot", "Lot Lizard", and such.

By her own representation, it's a fair to wonder how she reached the level she has, professionally.
I don't believe it was in her Day Job.

Harris; Up In Smoke

Harris.jpg



 
Last edited:
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bkv
I still think that POS Harris was meant to be their 2020 golden child. While it wouldn’t have likely happened, Gabbard made sure that it wasn’t going to. I’m surprised Harris was even in the debacle, I mean debate, and it just goes to show how rigged their process is.
 
Is there so little ammo to use against them (no pun, or violence, intended) that we have to use photoshopped pics?
Come on yall, let's be better.

But hell yes on the Seger!
 
I do.
I doubt she's smoking weed while giving a speech
 
Let me add - I have been wrong MANY times before, and I'll look into it right now to see if it's real or not
 
Why?

She already ( Happily ) implicated herself.

Yeah, she said she smoked weed. Ok.
Doesnt mean she's dumb enough to smoke a joint in front of a crowd giving a speech.

Besides, a quick google image search only shows one place with the image (initially, not reposted in a thread etc) - libertynewsnow
And if you look at other pics of her, she talks with her hands (not uncommon, Clinton did it, Trump does it etc) - and she often, it appears, uses her hands in a 'pinching' way.
So some person PSd in a joint.

Now, Ive given the reasons why I dont think it's real - why do you believe that picture is real?

Again, there's a lot of ways to make them look like fools, let's use real stuff not fake
 
Yeah, she said she smoked weed. Ok.
Doesnt mean she's dumb enough to smoke a joint in front of a crowd giving a speech.

Besides, a quick google image search only shows one place with the image (initially, not reposted in a thread etc) - libertynewsnow
And if you look at other pics of her, she talks with her hands (not uncommon, Clinton did it, Trump does it etc) - and she often, it appears, uses her hands in a 'pinching' way.
So some person PSd in a joint.

Now, Ive given the reasons why I dont think it's real - why do you believe that picture is real?

Again, there's a lot of ways to make them look like fools, let's use real stuff not fake

OH My God!

Lighten Up H.

IMHO, Frankly she is not "Day Time" Presidential material.

If nothing else the pic is a real metaphor, as she is a "Smooth Operator", but not smooth enough.

So, twenty lashes to me, and I wonder if she drags her , , , well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 
OH My God!

Lighten Up H.

IMHO, Frankly she is not "Day Time" Presidential material.

If nothing else the pic is a real metaphor, as she is a "Smooth Operator", but not smooth enough.

So, twenty lashes to me, and I wonder if she drags her , , , well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
No lashes, just saying let's be above it bro. She says way too much ignorant stuff to use against her, no need to pull in PSd stuff, that's all.
Dude, have an awesome day today
 
No lashes, just saying let's be above it bro. She says way too much ignorant stuff to use against her, no need to pull in PSd stuff, that's all.
Dude, have an awesome day today
I'm a "Back To Basics" person.

The majority of intelligent people can see through her facade.

For those that are close to getting the answer of 4, perhaps my ( possibility of others as well ) candor can help them understand the answer as well.

For those of us that prefer to , Dress(?) things up a bit, so be it.

IMHO, with Harris involved with the circus, she detracts from the entire message, in more ways than one, or two, or,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 
  • Like
Reactions: HMP
427733053_567dc49d54_o.jpg
 
The masks have come off...that’s a good thing.

Intentions are no longer being hidden or partially concealed. Politicians are finally speaking the truth about what they really want and how they intend to accomplish it.

As much as it angers me, I find it refreshing that a good number of them are being forthright about their contempt for liberty. For so long, most of them have tried to hide it or sugar-coat it...”No one is trying to take your guns,”

Well, now it’s abundantly clear, by their own admission, that is exactly what they’re trying to do and they have no reservations at all about doing an end-run around congress.

A lot of us saw through the BS and have sounded the alarm for quite a while, attempting to get folks in the perpetual comfort zone of “it’ll never happen here / they’re not trying to take our guns” to realize the end-game. Many of those people now see disarmament is that end-game; “They were right...those MFers do want to take our guns!”

Folks will wake up...folks are waking up. In my opinion, that is precisely why you are seeing over 2 million NICS transactions every month.

That ain’t a populace that’s suddenly got the bug for gun collecting....

It’s indicative of a people that can interpret the writing on the wall.
 
Last edited:
Like both legislative statutes and regulations promulgated by government agencies, executive orders are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if the orders lack support by statute or the Constitution. She knows it is not legal. She was trying to have a Ms. Spartacus moment.
 
Last edited:
Kamala is more than willing to use the brute force of police to achieve her goals.

In Ca. she was threatening to have police forcefully enter homes of truants. Truants!!!

She has also recently expressed a willingness to use the door kicking knuckledraggers at her disposal if elected.

Yes!

You guessed it! To come and get your guns!

When asked by the Washington Examiner if her plan would include legal gun owner databases or gun confiscation via law enforcement visits to residents who own banned firearms, she replied, “I'm actually prepared to take executive action to put in place rules that improve this situation.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...o-peoples-homes-to-confiscate-banned-firearms

Law Enforcement visits? Just WTF does that mean? They don't just "visit" people suspected of having illegal firearms.
 
I still think that POS Harris was meant to be their 2020 golden child. While it wouldn’t have likely happened, Gabbard made sure that it wasn’t going to. I’m surprised Harris was even in the debacle, I mean debate, and it just goes to show how rigged their process is.

All of these clowns are in this circus debate as a direct result of the debacle with the last DNC Primary which resulted in Hillary's underhanded tactics with respect to Bernie.

That p*ssed off a lot of the Democrat voting constituents, make no mistake. And while that, in and of itself, wasn't what caused the Democrats to lose the 2016 Presidential election, it was certainly a contributor.

Now what we're seeing is a sort of free-for-all in which those lower on the Democrat totem pole are standing up against the more powerful in a way which is showing an unprecidented fracturing of the historic Democrat political unity, knowing that even if they don't stand a snowball's chance, they'll STILL get their political voices heard with impunity.

The good thing for us is that these fractures are more clearly showing us what's behind their political wall in no uncertain terms, as these people are most definately NOT "beating around the bush" with the typical politcal bantering which tends to dance around direct answers to pointed questions without actually saying anything.

Now they're openly advocating violating rights, violating the Constitution, and government action to impliment tyranical laws and policies.

We need to pay close attention and use this to shift the political structure in this country...and by that, I mean bringing MORE of this kind of stuff out into the light from whatever the source and then stomping it.

Maybe we can buy ourselves a few more decades of relative liberty out of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom