United Nations "Force Intervention Brigade", Yes the UN has an offensive combat unit, I didn't Know

YeeHaa

YeeHaa

Member
Charter Life Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2016
Messages
6,791
Location
T'ville ~ Trinity
Rating - 100%
8   0   0
I run across some current info concerning the Virginia situation and different scenarios of how the situation could further develop and it was suggested / brought up that the UN could enter a conflict(?) under their own authority.
BTW, the UN entering conflict was not in reference to the current situation in Virginia but to another recent situation.

IN searching how in the Hell the UN could just inject themselves into a situation I discovered the following offensive force they have.
I am also unclear if they just deploy on their own or if such an action requires approval / SC Vote~s etc.

One thing is for certain, If an UN Offensive Force ( Force Intervention Brigade ) were to operate on USA Soil ( invited or not ) they would be Target Practice and I'm just stating the obvious, like it or not.

I'm also still looking into how this "FIB" is called up.


United Nations Force Intervention Brigade
the Force Intervention Brigade is the first UN peacekeeping operation specifically tasked to carry out targeted offensive operations to "neutralize and disarm" groups considered a threat to state authority and civilian security.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Force_Intervention_Brigade

UN approves DR Congo 'intervention brigade'

The resolution, sponsored by France, the US and Togo, would give the brigade a mandate to operate "in a robust, highly mobile and versatile manner" to ensure that armed groups cannot seriously threaten government authority or the security of civilians.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/afri...MIo5DUranJ5gIVBdvACh0SKAeGEAMYASAAEgIgQ_D_BwE



UN FIB 2.png UN FIB.jpg
 
txJ33uu.jpg


Terry
 
I could see the gov. ( whom ever that dummy is going to be ) Ordering the FIB in to do what the US military would not do under protection of the Republic by the Constituation.
I don't think the FIB stepping on our soil would last long in that scenario.
 
Inglis said:
Welcome to your short trip to the South.
Click to expand...

Actually considering these are likely to be hordes of 3rd world troops, we could probably just subvert the entire force with Malboros, sippin' liquor and junk food and the mere chance at some American poontang.

Anyone want some APCs and mortars and stuff? Bring some new paint. They are covered in silly blue and white logos right now
 
One of their loons recently said they should start looking at using military force to enforce their climate change agenda. Guess we can look forward to a land war in China first? Not sure if they thought that through.
 
So, they are authorized to operate in DRC, what does that have to do with VA? If I read that right , they are chartered/mandated to work in a specific place, similar to AMISOM forces.
 
Whether you love him or hate him I doubt very seriously Trump would allow the blue hats to operate inside our borders.
 
NCLivingBrit said:
View attachment 176697



So did Hydra.
Click to expand...

Not real sure I see the connection between a for-real United Nations entity and a Marvel comic. A security council veto by a permanent member would absolutely stop that in its tracks. The U.S. is a permanent voting member with veto power.

Mark my words here and now: It will never happen.
 
Chuckman said:
Not real sure I see the connection between a for-real United Nations entity and a Marvel comic. A security council veto by a permanent member would absolutely stop that in its tracks. The U.S. is a permanent voting member with veto power.

Mark my words here and now: It will never happen.
Click to expand...

It's this thing called humour mate.
 
Do you think they can actually find any UN troops dumb enough to come here and try to enforce anything ?
 
SnowRooster said:
Whether you love him or hate him I doubt very seriously Trump would allow the blue hats to operate inside our borders.
Click to expand...
Trump would literally grab a firearm from his secret service detail and put down these 'foreign invaders' himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob
JimB said:
A few facts and a lot of supposition can get you to any conclusion you want. Ever notice that folks looking to be afraid of something always find that thing.
Click to expand...
Jim, please, I mean while incredibly Rich, but
RIF

Amps 13 said:
Do you think they can actually find any UN troops dumb enough to come here and try to enforce anything ?
Click to expand...
Yes, especially if they recruited in Baltimore, Chicago, and the like,,,,,,,,,,,,,, No Background checks, and a paycheck.

Mattyb said:
So, they are authorized to operate in DRC, what does that have to do with VA? If I read that right , they are chartered/mandated to work in a specific place, similar to AMISOM forces.
Click to expand...
I was reading / reviewing current events earlier this morning and from one source it was said / suggested that when the Cartel murdered the family members just over the border in Mexico recently Trump wanted to or suggested sending US Troops over the border to assist.
It was suggested that one main reason he did not is because the UN would drop their troops into Mexico , to (?) IDK support Mexico?
Anyway I wondered how the UN would drop troops anywhere because I thought they are "Peace Keepers."
Well I discovered the "FIB" unit~s and had never heard of that unit before or even thought the UN had Offensive capabilities.

So what does this have to do with Virginia?
Nothing,,, as of yet or maybe ever.

Going to "States Rights", IDK if any state can call on "Out Side" military assistance to operate within said borders.
Even if a state did have that right I do not believe Trump would put up with such a thing.
Which made me recall the recent change of order~s in calling Marines up for Active Duty for Civilian Law Enforcement purposes.
Why Are the Marines Being Ordered to Active Duty in the United States?

https://ncrenegade.com/editorial/wh...-ordered-to-active-duty-in-the-united-states/
Click to expand...

The bottom line for me is, come Hell and or High Water the "Overlords" and "Joyful Whores" in Virginia are going to try anything to Dis-Arm their Citizens, period.
I would also expect a measured calculation to even allow shooting to start, serious. They are desperate.

Look what they're doing at the National Level.

FWIW
 
The Marine Corps thing has been argued and debunked. That is a non-issue.

Also, we have been sending our people over the border in Mexico for years, decades maybe. We don't advertise it.
 
Based on my limited research:
No, the UN has no standing army or police force on its own. Military and police personnel, from UN member states, working as peacekeepers in peacekeeping missions around the world are members of their own national service first and are seconded to work with the UN. They wear their countries' uniform and are identified as UN Peacekeepers by a UN blue helmet or beret.

Information about UN Peacekeeping Missions, including the breakdown of the troop-contributing countries, is available through the UN Peacekeeping website.

http://ask.un.org/faq/177270

I think for anyone to suggest Trump was dissuaded from action in Mexico by the possibility of UN intervention is ludicrous on its face.
 
The UN doesn’t have any troops, in any form, at all. They gets them from mostly 3rd world countries. They are allowed to do specific things in specific places, in this instance, only in the DRC. Completely and totally irrelevant to us, and has probably been happening for a long time (Somalia, Sierra Leone)
Any guard/reserve force being activated for SCA is routine to the point of being not noteworthy. Claiming it has to do with martial law (your link’s presumption, not yours) is tinfoil of another level. That nonsense has been all over so many websites, “prepper” blogs, militia websites, etc.... since at least 2002, probably longer. Even the NRA used it as a scare tactic to drum up donations some time ago, and it was nonsense then, as well.
I know that you may be aware of some or all of this already.
 
dmarbell said:
Based on my limited research:
No, the UN has no standing army or police force on its own. Military and police personnel, from UN member states, working as peacekeepers in peacekeeping missions around the world are members of their own national service first and are seconded to work with the UN. They wear their countries' uniform and are identified as UN Peacekeepers by a UN blue helmet or beret.
Click to expand...

Mattyb said:
The UN doesn’t have any troops, in any form, at all. They gets them from mostly 3rd world countries. They are allowed to do specific things in specific places, in this instance, only in the DRC. Completely and totally irrelevant to us, and has probably been happening for a long time (Somalia, Sierra Leone)
Any guard/reserve force being activated for SCA is routine to the point of being not noteworthy.
Click to expand...

Understood

My initial thought is as pointed out above, so how could the UN go on the Offensive ( so to say, or do ) and that's when I discovered their Force Intervention Brigade.
The Force Intervention Brigade is the first UN peacekeeping operation specifically tasked to carry out targeted offensive operations to "neutralize and disarm" groups considered a threat to state authority and civilian security.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Force_Intervention_Brigade

dmarbell said:
I think for anyone to suggest Trump was dissuaded from action in Mexico by the possibility of UN intervention is ludicrous on its face.
Click to expand...
There are other facts and variables involved in and with Mexico proper that , seem , to be relevant as well.
However I fully agree that just a singular ( suggested ) UN intervention on Mexican Soil against American Forces sounds completely mis-placed.

Mattyb said:
Claiming it has to do with martial law (your link’s presumption, not yours) is tinfoil of another level.
Click to expand...
Speaking of the Virginia situation,,
That's an interesting point because with the material I was reviewing it didn't come across to me as a "Martial Law" fix or fill in for such a situation.
Matter of fact Martial Law never crossed my mind but assisting or serving as a "Police & Enforcement " role did.

Mattyb said:
That nonsense has been all over so many websites, “prepper” blogs, militia websites, etc.... since at least 2002, probably longer. Even the NRA used it as a scare tactic to drum up donations some time ago, and it was nonsense then, as well.
Click to expand...
LoL, I don't follow Prep Sites and if / when "Planet Of The Apes" comes down my street, So Be It.

Mattyb said:
I know that you may be aware of some or all of this already.
Click to expand...
In general I am aware that some ( at least ) of the NRA's advertising will give AJ a run for his money.

JimB said:
Reduction In Force, I don’t get it.
Click to expand...

Reading Is Fundamental
https://www.rif.org/

I wouldn't feel too bad as Many here do not READ post properly before relying.
 
YeeHaa said:
Reading Is Fundamental
https://www.rif.org/

I wouldn't feel too bad as Many here do not READ post properly before relying.
Click to expand...

Ohh buurn! FWIW, you’re projecting. If you would learn to read more critically and analyze things more holistically you’d post a lot fewer of these types of threads.
 
JimB said:
Ohh buurn! FWIW, you’re projecting. If you would learn to read more critically and analyze things more holistically you’d post a lot fewer of these types of threads.
Click to expand...

R O F L M A O,,, Times Ten,,

I'm projecting what? That others ( including you ) don't read before repelling?

if you don't like what I post , easy, don't click.

Years ago I came to CSC and followed to here ( paid ) to learn something relevant to the sport, however while many here Bitch & Complain bout today's political leanings, seems very few contribute outside of peeking out of their Blinds & Windows looking to shoot something or one.

Suppose I would be a better fit here if I just fell in line with "Wink, Wink, " Gun sales.

FWIW
 
I don’t repel, bad back.
 
Chuckman said:
Not real sure I see the connection between a for-real United Nations entity and a Marvel comic. A security council veto by a permanent member would absolutely stop that in its tracks. The U.S. is a permanent voting member with veto power.

Mark my words here and now: It will never happen.
Click to expand...

Interesting discussion.

One thing that's I think making assumptions is that u.s authorities that world cast a veto vote would be more pro American than pro UN.

What if a couple elections from now that is no longer the case? What if the globalisys complete their takeover of the federal government?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
mig1nc said:
What if a couple elections from now that is no longer the case? What if the globalisys complete their takeover of the federal government?
Click to expand...
There are provisions in the Constitution for that.
 
@YeeHaa sorry I was in a pissy mood yesterday. You seem to spend a fair bit of time rooting about in the muck of the far right, and mostly you seem to be a guy trying to make sense of things that make little sense at least to me. What you’re doing is clearly not for me, I’m pretty dismissive of most of that stuff, but you have come up with stuff that’s good for folks to think about even if only to better understand why things could or could not happen. Anyway, I’m doing a crap job of it but wanted to apologize dumping a turd in your thread.

Jim
 
JimB said:
@YeeHaa sorry I was in a pissy mood yesterday. You seem to spend a fair bit of time rooting about in the muck of the far right, and mostly you seem to be a guy trying to make sense of things that make little sense at least to me. What you’re doing is clearly not for me, I’m pretty dismissive of most of that stuff, but you have come up with stuff that’s good for folks to think about even if only to better understand why things could or could not happen. Anyway, I’m doing a crap job of it but wanted to apologize dumping a turd in your thread.

Jim
Click to expand...
Wow Jim, that was mighty white of you. Did you join a 12 step program recently? :D

Seriously, I respected that. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom