Armor Test: Expired Kevlar from AR500, Ceramic BulletSafe plate

nowhere-man

Wayward Siberian
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Joined
Dec 18, 2016
Messages
154
Location
Cary, NC
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I was always curious whether the armor we can buy is real or fake. Recently I realized that a few plates in my closet are expired. So I decided to use it as an opportunity to satisfy my curiosity. Below results of the shooting of an expired AR500's level II soft panel and BulletSafe's level IV ceramic panel. I used 115 gr FMJ 9mm and 123gr FMJ 7.62x39.

Level II vs 9mm front
IMG_0776.JPG
Level II vs 9mm back. It works.
IMG_0777.JPG
Level IV vs 7.62mm front
IMG_0780.JPG
Level IV vs 7.62mm back. It works. But the bump size suggests that it should hurt like a hell.
IMG_0781.JPG
Just out of curiosity. Level II vs 7.62mm back. Wow...
IMG_0782.JPG
And Level IV vs 9mm. Easy to see why ceramic is one-hit option.
IMG_0783.JPG


The good news is that both plates are from a low price range and are old enough (both were purchased in 2015-2016).

I hope this would help somebody with armor choice :).

Scroll down to post #15 for 5.7x28 vs IIIa plate
 
Last edited:
I’m curious. Why do plates expire?
That's what they say:

There is some reason behind that, but the "expired" plate worked perfectly. So, I guess they deteriorate slower.
 
Not surprised at all but thanks for doing the test and sharing the info!
 
It was a good test, good info. I just can’t understand why Kevlar or ceramic or even ar500 plates would expire....clearly the test done shows it’s still great after the date. Once again thanks to nowhere-man for the information and real world test!!!
 
Blasting armor is fun.:p I did it as a job for a while.
ESOF14n.jpg


CHRIS
 
I’m curious. Why do plates expire?
The same reason meds do... And not nearly at the rate that you're lead to believe.

However, as mentioned, materials do eventually degrade over time and manufacturers are considering worse case. I've noticed a lot of unrelated plastics seem to just quit after about 10yrs. Car parts, knobs, handles, coverings seem to start disintegrating. Heat and UV seem to be major factors.


There was a type of soft body armor fiber that was recalled or at least warnings were sent out because those vest were degrading under normal use after a couple of years. Multiple companies used that fiber, because it was lighter in weight. But, they were very sensitive to heat and moisture. This isn't plates, but an example of what happens to materials.

Here it is, Zylon... This is from 2007.

Properties of Zylon®


Part of the Body Armor Safety Initiative is an applied research component that examined material properties of Zylon® to understand the causes of the ballistic failures. Preliminary findings from the applied research effort indicate that:


  • Zylon® fibers show a systematic loss in tensile strength, tensile strain [2], and ballistic performance correlated with the breakage of specific bonds in the chemical structure of the material.
  • It is likely that the ballistic performance degradation in Zylon®-containing armors is closely related to the chemical changes in poly-p-phenylene benzobisoxazole, the chemical basis of Zylon® fiber. The breakage of one particular part of the PBO molecule, known as the oxazole ring, correlates with degradation of the mechanical properties of Zylon® fibers. The breakage in the oxazole ring can be monitored using an analysis technique known as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
  • Preliminary investigations into Zylon® degradation mechanisms have suggested that oxazole-ring breakage occurs as a result of exposure to both moisture and light.
  • When there was no potential for external moisture to contact Zylon® yarns, there was no significant change in the tensile strength of these yarns. External moisture may be necessary to facilitate the degradation of Zylon® fibers.
See Third Status Report to the Attorney General on Body Armor Safety Initiative Testing and Activities (pdf, 47 pages) for greater detail on these findings.
 
Last edited:
Materials degrade over time, faster with constant wear and tear, and ceramic is pretty fragile.
Vest and armor will last past it’s expiration date. The issue, when does it go from good to bad. Like @Chuckman said, ceramic is fragile. Who is going to get it properly inspected every year for cracks? When do the fibers of a ballistic vest fail? That’s the thing, we can’t actually determine when a vest or armor (except for ceramic if it’s cracked) is no longer effective. That’s why they have expiration dates. The manufactures are saying in the harshest conditions, we know our product will be effective. And I’ve had some manufactures tell me the expiration date is conservative for liability purposes. However, I for don’t want to find out when the shooting starts that my vest or armor is a few days past it’s effective lifespan. There just isn’t away of looking at the outside and going yeah it’s good to go today.
 
The second session. :) I had a pair for the side panel I tortured before and curiosity whether 5.7x28 really is "armor-piercing" as it is advertised.

I tried SS198 green tip and American Eagle TMJ against Safe Life Class IIIa panel

SS198 green tip passed as a knife through butter (click on thumbnails to see bigger image).
IMG_0832.JPG

IMG_0831.JPG

TMJ round was stopped, but...

IMG_0833.JPG

The panel was "torn apart" and only next to the last layer actually stopped the bullet. So, I am afraid the next few rounds would find their way through the panel.

IMG_0835.JPG

And this is how hard it pushed it into the target.

IMG_0836.JPG
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom