That should have the scope pictured below instead of the dam thimble on stilts reddot monstrosity.Going to have to post a photo of this gorgeous beast to counteract the trailer park, lot lizard lovin' mess that is the one pictured above
ATF Prosecutes Ohio Man for AR Pistol with Brace
- Thread starter Johnny
- Start date
- Replies 52
- Views 4,323
Tim
Checked Out
Staff member
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Vendor
Multi-Factor Enabled
man...if only they were Prime eligible, I'd be all over it.
Going to have to post a photo of this gorgeous beast to counteract the trailer park, lot lizard lovin' mess that is the one pictured above
Me Like Very Much! I would love to do pretty much that in 9mm/.45
Going to have to post a photo of this gorgeous beast to counteract the trailer park, lot lizard lovin' mess that is the one pictured above
Izzat yours? I'd love something like that for both my .300blk SBR & my 18" 6.8.
I wish, just something I added to the firearm spankbank a while back.
I thought the only reason the charged him was because he "modified" the brace making the overall lenght of pull to exceed 13.5" which according to ATF is illegal but what the defense proved was they measured his trigger to end of brace at an diagonal so it made it longer but when the defense measured it on a straight line it was below 13.5" so the jury found him not guilty.
I was told by SB Tatical if your brace extends over 13.5" from the trigger, you have to find a way to keep it from extending such as gluing the lever tight or gluing it to the buffer tube where you cant slide it back.
I was told by SB Tatical if your brace extends over 13.5" from the trigger, you have to find a way to keep it from extending such as gluing the lever tight or gluing it to the buffer tube where you cant slide it back.
BigWaylon
Head philatelist
Staff member
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
Does somebody know what regulation is being used for 13.5" LOP? I've read a lot of statutes and regulations and I don't recall ever seeing it.
I saw somewhere that said it was from an memo that wasn’t released to the public but to a manufacturer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cubrock
Swell guy
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Multi-Factor Enabled
There are no statutes or even regulations regarding this arbitrary number. It is simply ATF "interpretation." "Well, if the LOP is over 13.5", it must be a stock instead of a brace."
Look for similar "interpretation" if/when they ban bump stocks. The statute is very clear in its definition of a machine gun and a bump stock does not fall under that definition. The interpretation will be convoluted reasoning on why bump stocks "should" count as machine guns and are, therefore, verboten.
Ikarus1
Avtomat Krishna-kov
That was the crux of the dismissal of the case. There was no way to know of any arbitrary limit on LOP. Although I can tell you, 13.5" is plenty for my use of a 5.56 or a Grendel pistol, once you step into the .458 realm.... an extra half inch might be really nice