DB question

KnotRight

Well-Known Member
Charter Member
Benefactor
Life Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2016
Messages
5,534
Location
Savannah, GA
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
First off, I do not have any cans and only shot a couple.

I understand that around 1050' second is where the sound barrier breaks. How much reduction is their shooting a 223 @ 2800' sec through a can? Or to rephrase the question, how much does breaking the sound barrier have in db's?
 
It all depends on where you're taking the measurement. At the shooter's ear? 3 feet to the side? At the muzzle? Downrange?

SilencerCo claims that their Specwar 556, for example, meters at about 130dB, compared to an unsuppressed noise of about 165 dB. And it's not immediately clear where and how they're taking those measurements, but let's assume that they are comparable to each other.

The problem is that measuring noise levels is extremely tricky. Different equipment at different places on different days will give different readings for the same noise source. Plus, the dB scale is logarithmic, so the difference between 50 dB and 60 dB is not the same as the difference between 100 dB and 110 dB, so interpreting the results is tricky, even if you get it all straight. Plus, sounds have subjective qualities that typically measuring equipment won't be able to display, at least not in a way that's easily decipherable. So the answer to your question of "how many dB less" is not at all as straight forward as the "about 35 dB" answer that I gave you.

The ballistic crack is usually not the loudest part of the sound of a gunshot, especially not to the shooter because it's mostly occurring downrange. I will say, though, that .223/5.56 through a suppressor is probably not hearing safe, if you want a reference point. It will still ring your ears and be uncomfortable without hearing protection.

If you really want to have a lot of fun with an AR and a suppressor, 300BLK is where it's at. But that's a whole big thing.
 
Using a can on supersonic ammo still makes a huge difference, especially when shooting outdoors.

The dB levels at the shooter's ear is greatly reduced.

I always shoot with ear pro. Unsuppressed, it's foam plugs of some type with muffs over them. Suppressed, regardless of supers or subs, it's only one or the other.

A suppressed .223 is still loud, and sounds like a gunshot...just not near as loud as an unsuppressed one.
 
It is pretty much borderline "hearing safe". For me personally and my tinnitus I'd hunt without muffs with a suppressor on rifle since it is only a few shots BUT range work even with a suppressor I'd still wear muffs since that "borderline" 135-140 db level from the crack as it breaks the sound barrier doesn't do my ears any good.
 
Last edited:
Suppressed .223 sounds a lot like a .22LR without a suppressor... maybe not even that loud
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom