DHS & Catastrophic Power Outages

Long_Hunter

Sufficient Speed, Acceptable Drag
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
3,502
Location
Fayette-Bragg Military Industrial Complex
Rating - 100%
37   0   0
Gov has published a number of reports related to EMP/CME events, with seemingly more focus on the cause than the effects.

This attached report is a bit different, with a heavy focus on consequences, rather than cause...is interesting to see something like this from .gov

I attached the report here, but you can access it yourself at:
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/f...Catastrophic Power Outage Study_508 FINAL.pdf
 

Attachments

  • NIAC Catastrophic Power Outage Study_508 FINAL.pdf
    2.5 MB · Views: 18
Thanks for posting this. The list of resources is impressive and really helps me research this subject.
 
Here’s what I’ve pulled from it so far...”we’re the feds and we’re here to take over”! Most of my career has been tied in with electric utilities and there was always a running joke in the field (local levels of these structures) when “corporate” types showed up to help with restorations. In one form or another, that went something like “hi, we are from “corporate” and we are here to help”...most responses from the field amounted to “find them the brooms to sweep the floors so they can’t f*** this up”!

That’s what I see this as, but would likely bring a much higher level CF with it! Over my lifetime, I haven’t seen many natural disaster responses that the Feds have done well!

Quote from the document:
“An event of this scale—with severe economic and national security implications—will require an unprecedented level of federal leadership, likely engage the military, and will see the federal government exercise authorities that have rarely or never been used. Infrastructure owners and operators and state leaders recognize this conceptually, yet it is unclear how command authorities will change, who will make decisions, and how resources will be coordinated.”
 
Last edited:
Good points here:

Supporting Findings
• Given the growing frequency and severity of disasters and other risks, there needs to be an increase in individual accountability, enterprise, and community investment in resilient infrastructure.
o Thereisamisconceptionthateventsoccurinfrequently.
o Thereneedstobemoreindividualaccountabilityforpreparedness.
• Resilience at the state and local level will be critical to enable people to shelter in place and
facilitate faster recovery. Any event that requires a mass evacuation will use up critical resources,
clog transportation pathways, and reduce the workforce necessary for infrastructure recovery.
• Electricity, fuel, clean drinking water, wastewater services, food/refrigeration, emergency medical
services, communications capabilities, and some access to financial services have been identified as critical lifeline services that would be needed to sustain local communities and prevent mass migration.
• People no longer keep enough essentials within their homes, reducing their ability to sustain themselves during an extended, prolonged outage. We need to improve individual preparedness.
o Mostpreparednesscampaignscallforcitizenstobepreparedfor72hoursinanemergency, but the new emerging standard is 14 days.
o Forexample,Washington,Oregon,andHawaiihaveastandardthatindividualshaveenough food and water to support themselves for 14 days. These efforts could serve as a model for federal and state preparedness resources, campaigns, and training.
o Theideaofindividualpreparednessisnotanewconcept.Civildefense,anoldertermused to elevate a level of individual preparedness and activate communities, used to be more widely accepted.
o FEMAoffersanumberoftools,resources,andguidanceonemergencypreparedness, including recent efforts focused on better financial preparedness for disasters, and working with interagency partners on activity books and courses to educate students on emergency preparedness.
 
thanks for that.
although we have always prepped for 3 days of anything,
we will "endeavor to persevere" (old movie quote) for 14.
 
Read both of them but wasn't as impressed as with the first one.

I've got two large book cases full of doom and gloom and how to type books. Probably 50% are worth reading more than once. Most are too full of drama rather than substance, or they loose sight of the subject. Don't mind a story line so long as it stays believable.

For general purpose fictional scenario of what I believe may happen I thunk 'Lights Out' is the best.
 
Back
Top Bottom