George Webb Restaurant doesn't allow staff to be victims.

Are you suggesting we do our own version of Minority Report and take preemptive action?
It's not "precognitive" to put a criminal in jail for assaulting somebody before they do it again. It's not science fiction to read stats on multiple and repeat violet offenders. Recidivists are recidivists are recidivists. They don't pay for their crimes, they don't become productive members of society, they are parasites.
 
You misinterpret my post.
I was pointing out that perception of threat is based on knowledge of the potential threat. Many here feel she was justified in shooting him, because he was a real threat, at least for those few moments he was advancing in the face of a gun. (And that's something we should all consider, jerkwad advances on you, you draw to discourage him, but due to adrenaline, rage or stupidity, he doesn't stop. He's not armed. Now what?)
His advancing at an armed individual could be perceived as intent to engage in deadly conflict. Also, remember that he was effectively continuing an assault on a female he had already attacked and disabled, by pushing her repeatedly toward the back and the other female. Again, implying intent of continuing harm.
You must also factor in the disparity of force between the assailant and the women. The woman with the gun did not shoot for reasons we do not know, fear of killing another, thinking the threat was not yet sufficient or she was in the process of squeezing the trigger, the guy sensed it and turned away just in time to make her stop. We weren't there. On sufficient threat, this is what I was talking about on relation to Tueller's rule. If you do not personally perceive the threat to be sufficient, even if in fact it is, then you are not justified. Many of us here perceive the threat to have been sufficient based on experiences and an understanding interpersonal conflict, would have pulled the trigger and argueably would have been justified in doing so.

Justification and rationalization. You do know what they say about that, right?

Don't assume that you and like minded individuals here are the only people that have had to solve violent issues between yourself or someone else and an adversary.

In the end, I'll agree to disagree with you on this issue.
 
It's not "precognitive" to put a criminal in jail for assaulting somebody before they do it again. It's not science fiction to read stats on multiple and repeat violet offenders. Recidivists are recidivists are recidivists. They don't pay for their crimes, they don't become productive members of society, they are parasites.

I don't disagree with your assessment, just your solution.

Take his human rights away and yours will eventually follow.
 
I got news for y'all, if this guy is still breathing, he is still a threat. I'm near positive he'll assault somebody else or work his way up to murder in the future.
I can be naïve from time to time. But, I’d hope that the thug understands how close he came to being shot, and learned a lesson that will stay with him the rest of his life.
 
His human rights ended where that lady's body began.

He never touched the woman with the gun.

Don’t you have to be human to claim those rights?

Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.

What will you do when someone decides your sub-human?

Wait! They already have. Just take a look around you and pay close attention to what the leftists have been up to.
 
He never touched the woman with the gun.



Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.

What will you do when someone decides your sub-human?

Wait! They already have. Just take a look around you and pay close attention to what the leftists have been up to.
Make up all the excuses you wish but that fella has some serious problems and he almost ate lead because of them.
I just don’t think the woman with the gun was going to ever strike the match. If that guy wanted to he probably could have taken her gun and beat her with it. He just wasn’t convinced 100% he could get away with it.
 
Last edited:
You guys sure are grumpy
 
He never touched the woman with the gun.



Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.

What will you do when someone decides your sub-human?

Wait! They already have. Just take a look around you and pay close attention to what the leftists have been up to.

Let me be clear - unjustifiably attacking anybody should get your ticket punched.
 
Back
Top Bottom