Grains of Titegroup?

3.2-3.4 and yup, subsonic.
 
3.4gr @ 1.130"

For use in a suppressed or unsuppressed Glock 19 with no spring mods. Zero cycling issues
 
11B CIB;n21980 said:
3.4gr @ 1.130"

For use in a suppressed or unsuppressed Glock 19 with no spring mods. Zero cycling issues
Click to expand...

This is what I load also. Works great for me.
 
Loaded my first few @ 3.2 haven't shot them yet.
 
~3.5gr of Titegroup @ 1.13-1.14 (flat 147gr Blue) for an M&P Pro
Worked ok for all the matches I went too since Aug this year.
But this is me, so.
 
Less than 3.4gr would not give me 100% slide lock back on empty mag and would occasionally have an FTE. Again this is probably due to the host and having a 9oz metal tube on the barrel but if you want to run a really light load, I'd test a few mags worth to see how it works
 
11B CIB said:
Less than 3.4gr would not give me 100% slide lock back on empty mag and would occasionally have an FTE. Again this is probably due to the host and having a 9oz metal tube on the barrel but if you want to run a really light load, I'd test a few mags worth to see how it works
Click to expand...
Have you run test with then without tube for reliability test? Maybe a lighter recoil spring would help.
 
11B CIB said:
Less than 3.4gr would not give me 100% slide lock back on empty mag and would occasionally have an FTE. Again this is probably due to the host and having a 9oz metal tube on the barrel but if you want to run a really light load, I'd test a few mags worth to see how it works
Click to expand...
With a 147 grain bullet? I have issues with lighter bullets running sluggishly but not with a 147 seated around 1.13 COAL.
 
11B CIB said:
Less than 3.4gr would not give me 100% slide lock back on empty mag and would occasionally have an FTE. Again this is probably due to the host and having a 9oz metal tube on the barrel but if you want to run a really light load, I'd test a few mags worth to see how it works
Click to expand...
I tested it suppressed and unsuppressed. I don't want to mess with spring rates because it functions 100% as it is, and I don't want to run into issues with cycling or anything when using a suppressor. It's only .2gr more powder. That's an easier fix than swapping out springs IMO
 
11B CIB said:
Less than 3.4gr would not give me 100% slide lock back on empty mag and would occasionally have an FTE. Again this is probably due to the host and having a 9oz metal tube on the barrel but if you want to run a really light load, I'd test a few mags worth to see how it works
Click to expand...
True, you will never feel .2 grains, just shocked as I haven't found a 9mm yet that doesn't like my go to 3.2 suppressed or otherwise. Will even run Slackers AR9 however I believe he is running the same 3.4 - 3.5 you are and for the same reasons.
 
11B CIB said:
Less than 3.4gr would not give me 100% slide lock back on empty mag and would occasionally have an FTE. Again this is probably due to the host and having a 9oz metal tube on the barrel but if you want to run a really light load, I'd test a few mags worth to see how it works
Click to expand...
And I meant to add its a 147gr plated RN bullet
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom