I have some WC846 (according to the jug) which is supposed to be an equivalent to BLC(2). The guidelines are to start 10% low and work up. I do that. And yet, I still get pressure signs, yet don't get the expected velocity out of my 308. I have to go way down (well below minimums) to not get pressure signs, and of course SD starts to go way up with lower case fills in my 308.
I'm sure I'll get an opinion "throw it away", but that's unreasonable considering the quantity I have and the scarcity of powder and components.
My thought is that it's a faster powder, mislabeled as BLC2(equivalent). It is burning up quickly, causing high pressure, but not continuing down the long/large bore of a 308.
I was planning on looking at the relative burn rate charts and look for recipes which would be for a faster powder. I'm thinking something for 223 instead.
For example from the Hodgdon site, both 335 and BLC2 are appropriate for 308 with 150 grain bullet, but they're 4 grains apart (with 335 being less as it is faster). 322 being even faster is on the site and 4 grains lower than 335.
Is my theory sound?
I'm sure I'll get an opinion "throw it away", but that's unreasonable considering the quantity I have and the scarcity of powder and components.
My thought is that it's a faster powder, mislabeled as BLC2(equivalent). It is burning up quickly, causing high pressure, but not continuing down the long/large bore of a 308.
I was planning on looking at the relative burn rate charts and look for recipes which would be for a faster powder. I'm thinking something for 223 instead.
For example from the Hodgdon site, both 335 and BLC2 are appropriate for 308 with 150 grain bullet, but they're 4 grains apart (with 335 being less as it is faster). 322 being even faster is on the site and 4 grains lower than 335.
Is my theory sound?
Last edited: