Post #85 up thread a tad...
Intense.
Post #85 up thread a tad...
He was almost stopped by a guy who tackled him... what if two guys had tackled him? That's what I don't understand... why don't three of four guys jump him and beat him to a pulp?Only thing that could have stopped it was someone with a gun.
He said it's the nation that aligns with his views the most.I believe he's referring to the fact that China is highly nationalistic.
That is exactly what the United Nations has been trying to do.Maybe it's just me, but it appears the "gun issue" is being hammered away at on a global scale.
Personally, I believe the ruling elite, the string pullers, want a monopoly on force via a completely disarmed populace....globally.
Link for video?I don't understand some people... I just watched the video. That's some messed up shite. He is a truly demented individual. Joking as he drives around shooting through the window after murdering dozens of people...
That is exactly what the United Nations has been trying to do.
http://www.conservativehq.com/article/28052-democrats-and-un-uniting-disarm-americans
He only aligned with China on nationalism. Nothing more.He seems to be clueless and very confused. He did say that about China. He also called himself an eco-terrorist. I don’t think China and eco terrorism go together the way he meant it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link for video?
Maybe it's just me, but it appears the "gun issue" is being hammered away at on a global scale.
Personally, I believe the ruling elite, the string pullers, want a monopoly on force via a completely disarmed populace....globally.
He only aligned with China on nationalism. Nothing more.
I believe the Muslim holy text says "Kill the infidels wherever you find them"I wonder what would happen if somebody started a Christian church in Iran or SA...
Thanks.Look around post #83 I think...
I could make out "this is for" on the AR.I'm waiting for an analysis on the writing all over his weapons.
Ya think?Maybe it's just me, but it appears the "gun issue" is being hammered away at on a global scale.
Personally, I believe the ruling elite, the string pullers, want a monopoly on force via a completely disarmed populace....globally.
He only aligned with China on nationalism. Nothing more.
Nope. Not at all what he said. Is that a CNN talking point?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Some of y'all are getting awfully close to being ok with what this guy did.
Be careful how long you stare into the abyss.
Some of y'all are getting awfully close to being ok with what this guy did.
Be careful how long you stare into the abyss.
I lost a friend on 9/11, 2 friends in the following sandbox wars... I seen the war footage, terrorist bombing videos, and felt anger at the fact our troops and civilians been killed by these Muslim terrorists. Then I watched the entire Christchurch video. And I have to say I really didn’t feel anything while I was watching it. I don’t condone anyone going into a house of worship and shooting the place up with firearms. That’s just wrong no matter what side does it. I’m not a monster, I don’t condone the killing of innocent. After watching the video I find myself reflecting on the issue as you say “being ok it” and come to the conclusion that paybacks a bitch.
Whole lot of whataboutism going on in this thread.
Anyone who takes offense with what I said should ask yourself why.
Feel free to admit you're ok with this guy shooting up a mosque. No reason to pussyfoot around it. Stop it with all this "I don't think it's right, but..." stuff and just come out with it.
If you don't feel anything after watching this guy execute human beings in the most violent and cruel fashion possible, then you 've already looked into the abyss too long, and you've become the monsters you're railing against.
Terrorists are winning, not through breeding or bombings, but through the normalization of violence which leads to the devaluing of human life, rights, and liberty.
Ok with it? No. I, and I'm sure many others here, think some of the things he did, like making sure everyone in the pile was dead was cruel and despicable. But, many of us also believe that this was the inevitable consequence of the perceived unchecked invasion of the world by the Muslim influence. Perhaps it is a hint of the frustration that many of us feel. I do believe there are "innocent" or so called moderate Muslims that do not believe in violence and don't realize their donations may be funding violence. Some in that mosque may have been these innocents. But, as one scholar suggest, concerning "moderate" Muslims, they're not doing it right. Ultimately the Muslim faith turns to violence to accomplish it's goal. What goal? Peace of course. They seek peace. Ask a Muslim what that world looks like. Is it one world with all the religions getting along? No. It's one religion, one god. That's their peace. No more war, because they've won. It reminds me of the scene from Independence Day when the president tries to reason with the alien. "How can we make peace? What do you want from us?" The reply? "To die."Whole lot of whataboutism going on in this thread.
Anyone who takes offense with what I said should ask yourself why.
Feel free to admit you're ok with this guy shooting up a mosque. No reason to pussyfoot around it. Stop it with all this "I don't think it's right, but..." stuff and just come out with it.
If you don't feel anything after watching this guy execute human beings in the most violent and cruel fashion possible, then you 've already looked into the abyss too long, and you've become the monsters you're railing against.
Terrorists are winning, not through breeding or bombings, but through the normalization of violence which leads to the devaluing of human life, rights, and liberty.
He was almost stopped by a guy who tackled him... what if two guys had tackled him? That's what I don't understand... why don't three of four guys jump him and beat him to a pulp?
What the hell does anyone think is going to happen when the governing body refuses to listen to the consent of the governed?
The same ones decrying the slaughter of those poor human beings would likely be screaming to nuke every muzzie country out of existence.Would the reaction be the same from you folks if a Muslim walked into the First Baptist Church in Charlotte and killed just as many??
Yup, it’s a firearm that killed 49 - take it away and the problem is solved
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12213269
One in this thread appalled at the lack of compassion called for dropping nukes on an entire Mid East country. That means killing millions. He also wished for the death of Ruth Ginsburg. Now he’s out to save our soul.The same ones decrying the slaughter of those poor human beings would likely be screaming to nuke every muzzie country out of existence.
Out of sight, out of mind. - How many countless "innocent civilians" have been killed by American bombings and drone strikes? Nobody seems to care when it's the government.One in this thread appalled at the lack of compassion called for dropping nukes on an entire Mid East country. That means killing millions. He also wished for the death of Ruth Ginsburg. Now he’s out to save our soul.
Terrorists are winning, not through breeding....
@drypowder would tell you that eventually their (whites) survival instinct will kick in. When that happens, the non white population is going to get clobbered and it will be a situation that will have to burn itself out in spectacular fashion. It wouldn’t surprise me if at the end of it to see Islam being as common as paganism.Actually, they are winning through breeding. Europeans are reproducing at far less than sustainable rates and their immigrants are outpacing them by 3-4x. Simple numbers. In two or three generations, muslims will be the majority in most of Europe.