Serialized gun parts

TriggerMan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2022
Messages
403
Location
Columbia, SC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hoping this is the right forum as it deals with several different topics.

First, a bit of background on my question. I recently purchased a new Ruger Mk 4 Lite 22/45 pistol. One of my main interests in this pistol was the fact that the top end was easily removable/swappable much like an AR pattern rifle or many pistols such as the Sig P320.

So here is my question. I copied it from another site I am a member of and pasted it here so I wouldn't have to type it all over again. By the way, no one ever responded to the question at the other site so here goes....


Guys help me understand something please.....

On an AR15 type rifle the lower reciever is the serialized part. I have always in my mind attributed that to the fact the fire control components/trigger are located there. You can buy any upper for your serialized lower and have it shipped directly to your home.

On most pistols the serialized portion is again the grip frame or lower section of the pistol which again contains the fire control parts and trigger. Even though grips on the P320s are interchangeable, the serial numbered part is the firing mechanism once again. You can freely order new barrels and slides with no FFL and have it sent directly to your home.

On the Ruger MK 4s, it is completely opposite. The lower grip frame has no serial number but still houses the fire control components. The barrel which no other firearm I am aware of is the serialized item. To buy a different barrel I need to ship to an FFL and complete a form 4473.

What gives here? What determines what portion of a firearm is the serialized part? Is it up to the manufacturer? Does the government decide? Such a silly thing. I want to order a barrel 1.5" longer and have to go through hoops for the ruger but could order 50 AR15 uppers and 50 P320 slides and barrels and have them direct shipped to my home no questions asked.
 
I think this was a Ruger company decision, not an ATF decision, and it was made many years ago.

No point in looking for any logic in it, they probably just flipped a coin or considered where it was least expensive to stamp.
 
I've never understood why the barrel isn't the serialized part. It's the one thing that's common to nearly all firearms and is something that can't be made at home (at least a rifled version) without some fairly in-depth engineering equipment.

If you believe movies/TV it's also the one part that has some level of unique-ness.
 
I think this was a Ruger company decision, not an ATF decision, and it was made many years ago.

No point in looking for any logic in it, they probably just flipped a coin or considered where it was least expensive to stamp.


When Ruger made that decision, serial numbers weren’t required by federal law. Once they were required, ATF went with what Ruger was already doing for Rugers, what Colt was already doing for AR15s, etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom