Ya kind of twisted that one JR, I think we all agree that there are some people that shouldn't have a gun, we see them at the range every time we go. Nobody said inmates should have guns like the guards, you made that one up, but when you mention venues where they shouldn't be allowed, aren't LEO's allowed to have their guns in those same venues?? So now you're better than we are???
And how would you propose we become "well regulated"??? Classes from existing LEO's?? Private instruction?? How?? What is your definition of "well regulated"??
JR, from what I've derived from some of your posts I think you have the opinion that only LEO's are "qualified enough" to possess guns in a general setting. We're okay at the range but not in public venues..
"I think we all agree that there are some people that shouldn't have a gun"
You haven't been paying attention to the "shall not..." crowd because that's exactly what they say.
"Nobody said inmates should have guns like the guards, you made that one up"
True, I did but if you believe "shall not..." is inviolate, you have to allow this too.
"you mention venues where they shouldn't be allowed, aren't LEO's allowed to have their guns in those same venues?"
This is only true when they are functioning as LEO's, remember the cop who was loaned a gun by the country singer?
"So now you're better than we are???"
Well, still not a cop Mr. retired Trooper but I defy you to show where I have EVER said or even implied that they were better, you can't.
"And how would you propose we become "well regulated"???"
Since I didn't make the rule maybe you should ask someone else.
"JR, from what I've derived from some of your posts I think you have the opinion that only LEO's are "qualified enough" to possess guns in a general setting"
If that's what you derive you are reading what they say about me and not what I say as I have never said or implied that at all.