..."wondered if your search or viewing history is going to 'put you on some kind of list,' your concern may be more than warranted."...whole report

turkeydance

Well-Known Member
Life Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
4,507
Location
nc
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
since it is paywalled, here is the whole thing.....

Feds Ordered Google To Unmask Certain YouTube Users. Critics Say It’s ‘Terrifying.’
In two court orders, the federal government told Google to turn over information on anyone who viewed multiple YouTube videos and livestreams. Privacy experts say the orders are unconstitutional.
The government orders show an "unconstitutional" overreach by the government, multiple privacy experts said.
Federal investigators have ordered Google to provide information on all viewers of select YouTube videos, according to multiple court orders obtained by Forbes. Privacy experts from multiple civil rights groups told Forbes they think the orders are unconstitutional because they threaten to turn innocent YouTube viewers into criminal suspects.
In a just-unsealed case from Kentucky reviewed by Forbes, undercover cops sought to identify the individual behind the online moniker “elonmuskwhm,” who they suspect of selling bitcoin for cash, potentially running afoul of money laundering laws and rules around unlicensed money transmitting.
In conversations with the user in early January, undercover agents sent links of YouTube tutorials for mapping via drones and augmented reality software, then asked Google for information on who had viewed the videos, which collectively have been watched over 30,000 times.
The court orders show the government telling Google to provide the names, addresses, telephone numbers and user activity for all Google account users who accessed the YouTube videos between January 1 and January 8, 2023. The government also wanted the IP addresses of non-Google account owners who viewed the videos. The cops argued, “There is reason to believe that these records would be relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation, including by providing identification information about the perpetrators.”
“No one should fear a knock at the door from police simply because of what the YouTube algorithm serves up.”
Albert Fox-Cahn, executive director at the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project The court granted the order and Google was told to keep the request secret until it was unsealed earlier this week, when it was obtained by Forbes. The court records do not show whether or not Google provided data in the case.
In another example, involving an investigation in New Hampshire, the Portsmouth Police received a threat from an unknown male that an explosive had been placed in a trashcan in a public area. The order says that after the police searched the area, they learned they were being watched over a YouTube live stream camera associated with a local business. Federal investigators believe similar events have happened across the U.S., where bomb threats were made and cops watched via YouTube.
They asked Google to provide a list of accounts that “viewed and/or interacted with” eight YouTube live streams and the associated identifying information during specific timeframes. That included a video posted by Boston and Maine Live, which has 130,000 subscribers. Mike McCormack, who set up the company behind the account, IP Time Lapse, said he knew about the order, adding that they related "to swatting incidents directed at the camera views at that time."
Again, it’s unclear whether Google provided the data.
"With all law enforcement demands, we have a rigorous process designed to protect the privacy and constitutional rights of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” said Google spokesperson Matt Bryant. “We examine each demand for legal validity, consistent with developing case law, and we routinely push back against overbroad or otherwise inappropriate demands for user data, including objecting to some demands entirely."
 
update concerning credit cards.....
some are doing it already without telling us,
but you already knew you were on some "list".
quote:
Chase Bank is launching a new retail media platform that allows brands to market directly to its 80 million customers — using data on their spending habits.
 
Last edited:
update concerning credit cards.....
some are doing it already without telling us,
but you already knew you were on some "list".
quote:
Chase Bank is launching a new retail media platform that allows brands to market directly to its 80 million customers — using data on their spending habits.

They probably are telling you - it's just buried in their ToS or card agreement policy that no one ever reads.
Doesn't make it right tho...
 
I firmly believe that my personal watchdog goes home and sobs into the arms of his wife every night from my internet history alone.
Wife lol.

He has either a body pillow made of dead dogs with suspicious stains or a burly husband who makes him dress up like Wendy before violating the laws of man and God all up in there.
 
I think this is good news. Well, terrible news, but good news because it's so shocking it will force change.

The scary thing about the Google video, as I understand it:
1.) Feds tried to entrap some crypto bros, posted link to a youtube video.
2.) Then ask for anyone that viewed the video, whether or not there is proof they are related to the cryptobros, or if they just checked it out based on random youtube feed popup/autoplay/curiousity, they didn't even narrow down time.

---
Something that broad is going to freak out Congress and cause a PP slap against that kinda use by the FBI.

---
It's like when car companies started charging subscriptions to use things already installed in the car, like heated seats or turbos. Caused so much outrage that it nipped that idiocy in the bud.

---
Now, people are getting concerned about car companies sharing driving data to insurance companies who may raise your rates or deny a claim, which is insane. GE is starting to limit who they share that data to, and hopefully the congresscritters will get scared enough that will be completely banned, too.

So I hope more heinous and scary stuff hits the news, better we be stabbed in the front and know and prepare for it, than a stab in the back.
 
Wife lol.

He has either a body pillow made of dead dogs with suspicious stains or a burly husband who makes him dress up like Wendy before violating the laws of man and God all up in there.
I figured his wife was probably just a they/them.
 
You haven't met enough NSA guys. You either get goody-goody homeschoolers, or people so introverted they'd be too shy to even write pronouns. :p
I figured ATF and FBI just had new recruits draw short straws for me.
 
You haven't met enough NSA guys. You either get goody-goody homeschoolers, or people so introverted they'd be too shy to even write pronouns. :p
Never put your pronouns in writing, declare yourself pronoun fluid and constantly change them.

When someone gets them wrong run to HR and scream about a hostile work environment. Everyone will love you.
 
This has been the case since the Obama era. I posted about it on this or the previous place back then and was told by several folks that I was a conspiracy theorist. Three months later the story broke. I think it is safe to assume if you are on this forum, support any group that has religious views, talk about 2A issues and laws that regulate them, someone is watching you.
 
what you type is not secure
on Chinese keyboard apps.
and, most are Chinese.
update:

The vulnerability, which allows the keystroke data that these apps send to the cloud to be intercepted,
has existed for years and could have been exploited by cybercriminals and state surveillance groups,
according to researchers at the Citizen Lab, a technology and security research lab affiliated with the University of Toronto.

 
G00gle lies- "With all law enforcement demands, we have a rigorous process designed to protect the privacy and constitutional rights of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” said Google spokesperson Matt Bryant. “We examine each demand for legal validity, consistent with developing case law, and we routinely push back against overbroad or otherwise inappropriate demands for user data, including objecting to some demands entirely."
 
You haven't met enough NSA guys. You either get goody-goody homeschoolers, or people so introverted they'd be too shy to even write pronouns. :p
We had one at a previous church, he seems to fit your description. I got a really odd expression when I asked him why he chose to work for the enemy of the Constitution and our liberty.
 
Back
Top Bottom