From what I've read, it is approximately 90 days.Do they know how long antibodies are hanging out now? That's not my bag, so I have not read much about it.
From what I've read, it is approximately 90 days.Do they know how long antibodies are hanging out now? That's not my bag, so I have not read much about it.
That's for the "vaccine" and not an infection. They claim the vaccine lasts at least 6 months, the titer for antibodies post infection appear to start greatly diminishing at 90 days.That article you linked in your other thread says that antibodies produced from the Phizer vax are still being detected 6 months after. It doesn't say if that's when they run out or if that's the longest term they had available to test.
Blood tests for antibodies are only if you feel like you've had it recently. Titers diminish over time, and I don't recall how long you have to get tested, but a couple months or more and it will likely be completely out of your system.
Do they know how long antibodies are hanging out now? That's not my bag, so I have not read much about it.
It is factually correct that antibodies diminish over time, which is why those who are in hyper-immune plasma donation receive higher compensation for their "donations." It is not a permanent thing.Not at all correct. I had it Feb mar 2020. March 26 2021 still showed significant antibodies
Agreed. Until then, I don’t want to be part of the guinea pig group. I have no reason to get it right now. I’m young (mid-30’s), healthy, work from home, and don’t know anyone “high risk”.I think if no adverse affects are shown in a year then it's pretty safe.
While I agree. 90 days isn't the said and done.It is factually correct that antibodies diminish over time, which is why those who are in hyper-immune plasma donation receive higher compensation for their "donations." It is not a permanent thing.
As expected, the CDC and ME's are doing the exact opposite of what is done with COIVD death reporting.Whether Pro or Anti Vax,
Big Pharma & Bro use numbers that favor their story, so unless one dives into the data / info you will not receive a clear picture.
CDC: 2,509 Deaths Following Experimental COVID-19 “Vaccines” Now Equal to Total Deaths Recorded After Vaccines for the Past Decade
However, the most up-to-date number of deaths following COVID-19 emergency use authorized injections was reported earlier this week on March 30th on the CDC website which stated 2,509 deaths have been reported through March 29, 2021 following experimental COVID-19 injections.
So in just a little over 3 months since the FDA gave emergency use authorization (EUA) for experimental COVID-19 injections to be tested on the American population, as many deaths have been recorded following those experimental injections as deaths recorded to VAERS following FDA approved vaccines for the period starting January 1, 2010 and ending December 31, 2020, a period of 11 years spanning an entire decade.
And yet, the CDC remains adamant that not a single death recorded after an experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” had anything to do with those “vaccines.”
CDC: 2,509 Deaths Following Experimental COVID-19 “Vaccines” Now Equal to Total Deaths Recorded After Vaccines for the Past Decade - Conservative Choice Campaign
by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News Yesterday (April 2, 2021) the CDC released more data into their Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. Government funded database that tracks injuries and deaths caused by vaccines. The data in VAERS now goes through March 26, 2021...conservativechoicecampaign.com
Also, if Pfizer is handed "Full FDA Approval" do they lose their "Tail Light Guarantee" here in our USA?
Pfizer Demands Nations Put Up Collateral to Cover Vaccine Injury Lawsuits
Story at-a-glance:
- Pfizer is demanding countries put up sovereign assets, including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings, as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation.
- Argentina and Brazil have rejected Pfizer’s demands. According to legal experts, Pfizer is abusing its power.
- In the U.S., vaccine makers already enjoy full indemnity against injuries occurring from the COVID-19 vaccine under the PREP Act. If you’re injured, you’d have to file a compensation claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which is funded by U.S. taxpayers.
- A significant problem with the CICP is that it’s administered within the Department of Health and Human Services, which is also sponsoring the COVID-19 vaccination program. This conflict of interest makes the CICP less likely to admit fault with the vaccine.
- The maximum CICP payout you can receive — even in cases of permanent disability or death — is $250,000 per person, and you first have to exhaust your private insurance policy before the CICP kicks in.
Employers that mandate the COVID-19 vaccine will also be indemnified from liability for side effects. Instead, claims will be routed through worker’s compensation programs.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...ateral-vaccine-injury-lawsuits/?itm_term=home
It is factually correct that antibodies diminish over time, which is why those who are in hyper-immune plasma donation receive higher compensation for their "donations." It is not a permanent thing.
I work in the industry that produces products from people with active titers. Once it gets below a certain level, it becomes next to impossible to detect the presence until you become infected again.Do we know this to be universally true? Legit question, I have no idea. For example, chicken pox. Once you get it, in 80 years your titers will show antibodies.
I know with COVID antibodies in some testing have diminished over time: so far (knowing things change and insert Bayes' theorem here) they all seem to diminish over time; has any one (sex, race, ethnicity, etc.) had any antibodies persist?
Yet. It's experimental gene therapy with unknown future effects on health. Period.Got my second shot last week with no abnormal affects.
So if one's immune system fought it off successfully in the past, is there any reason to think it wouldn't successfully fight it again in the future?I work in the industry that produces products from people with active titers. Once it gets below a certain level, it becomes next to impossible to detect the presence until you become infected again.
Go ahead and drop the mic now.So if one's immune system fought it off successfully in the past, is there any reason to think it wouldn't successfully fight it again in the future?
I appreciate the thought, but I was really asking an honest question... I understand that this virus, like most, mutates and evolves. While the fearmongers push concerns that the mutations of nCOV are more dangerous than the original, my understanding is that most viruses mutate into LESS dangerous versions. What is the difference now?Go ahead and drop the mic now.
We are wonderfully made with an immune system fined tuned over at least several millenia
No. If you do not have any other complications since your initial infection, your immune system should be able to produce a similar result. Variants will likely be treated in a like manner.So if one's immune system fought it off successfully in the past, is there any reason to think it wouldn't successfully fight it again in the future?
Agreed. As with any virus, it'll affect a few of us adversely. What the media, government, and doctors want us all to believe is that man is the master of their future, which simply is not the case. We're not going to live forever, nor are we going to find a cure to every disease/virus.Go ahead and drop the mic now.
We are wonderfully made with an immune system fined tuned over at least several millenia
I didn't want to start a new thread, but I noticed Google's animation today.
The letters are people and they realize they are too close and wearing only one mask. So, they slap on extra masks and spread out.
Sheesh.
Brother, just buy a vaccine passport on the black market. That's what I will do. Or pay someone to pretend to give it to you. There will be a BIG market for fake crap.What if youre not sure?
Right now Im at a 'no.'
Right now Im not into getting the vaccine, doesnt interest me...but I think of the future and see it in my future possibly.
Gosh I hate needles, HATE. I dont get shots, dont get my blood drawn.
But I also love to travel. I also love to go to shows (concerts).
I worry that if I dont have the vaccine that in the future I wont get to do the things that I enjoy. ANd for that I think it might be in my future.
But Im holding out, Im hoping it fades out sooner rather than later.
this is the check in if you are NOT getting the vaccine AND the criticize/belittle those that are not getting the vaccine threadMass confusion in which vaccine thread some should be posting in. One is to check in if you ARE getting it...one for if you AREN’T. This is the AREN’T thread. 🤣
this is the check in if you are NOT getting the vaccine AND the criticize/belittle those that are not getting the vaccine thread
the other one is the check in if you ARE getting the vaccine AND criticize/belittle those that are getting it thread
got it?