I realize that.....I wasn't attributing the quote to you, though I can see how the quote function may have made it seem that way.
Apologies for the inference, 'twas not the intent.
No worries!
I realize that.....I wasn't attributing the quote to you, though I can see how the quote function may have made it seem that way.
Apologies for the inference, 'twas not the intent.
Hopefully the county sheriff that lied also gets a similar punishment.
I'm really coming to the conclusion that the proper response to nonsense like this needs to be The People putting an end to it right then, right there. Forget this crap about letting the chain of command reprimand them. Officer Jackwagon needs to be in the ER getting his badge removed from his rectum and the dog needs to be on the BBQ.
And its been so successful, I mean how would we even know about synthetic MJ and bath salts if they never banned good ol OTC Opium Tincture at the Pikes DrugstoreThank god we have a war on drugs. Making sure people don't take substances into their own bodies should be stopped by any means necessary.
When it's justified and necessary, absolutely. Being a "government thug" doesn't make you or your actions automatically legitimate. When they act like criminal thugs, they should get the same treatment as any other "criminal thug". Right then, right there. I absolutely reject the notion that they should somehow be a protected class. Similarly, I reject the principle that somehow the "government" or even society as a whole is somehow above me or has "authority" over me and I don't believe that some god is going to damn me for defending myself against this society which I would gladly put on it's knees.So, are you advocating violence against the police?
Where did I say it was acceptable? It isn't. He should be punished. But you're advocating violence. That's not acceptable either. Posts like yours are what got people riled up and a bunch of cops murdered over the past year. Personally, I don't think you were being figurative but, either way, your post was appalling and shameful. People that make statements like that don't have any right to criticize anyone else in my opinion.
When it's justified and necessary, absolutely. Being a "government thug" doesn't make you or your actions automatically legitimate. Putting on a stupid badge and calling yourself the "law"
doesn't make you a good guy.
Why? Because that's what the Crown has declared? That it has the right to use force to enact it's will but you must go through it's system at great personal expense. Eff That.Shouldn't you "fight" them in court?
No, I'm not one of those. I'll be polite. I'll be respectful, to a point, but not because I recognize their authority. I don't even see them as my equal.Or are you one of those guys that rolls the window down an inch and immediately starts telling them what your rights are under the Constitution?
I've been pulled over numerous times in my 57 years and I've never been denied any rights or had my car searched.
And its been so successful, I mean how would we even know about synthetic MJ and bath salts if they never banned good ol OTC Opium Tincture at the Pikes Drugstore
Just wait til we get Krokodil over here
So, are you advocating violence against the police?
If you stand for violence against cops, you don't have a leg to stand on to complain against violence coming from them.
Deja moo
Big time.
No, I'm not one of those. I'll be polite. I'll be respectful, to a point, but not because I recognize their authority. I don't even see them as my equal.
I haven't read many news stories of any of you guys whipping popo ass. I guess it's a bunch of internet bravado.
Haven't seen any pictures of you polishing leather with your uvula either.....
You really don't get it. I seriously doubt that many of us here go around doing things that would put us in a situation where we would have to. Still, that doesn't mean that I accept or agree with the idea that if someone is going to operate as a thug in the name of the State that the recourse should to have to accept that "authority" and plead before the Crown. A thug is still a thug even when they operate under the notion of "law".I haven't read many news stories of any of you guys whipping popo ass. I guess it's a bunch of internet bravado.
I wonder how many of them would concede any notion of their right to rule when their spine is about to be snapped?Shouldn't you be storming the State House instead of playing internet commando?
First, let's address the statement by @Cowboy Very simply, flip it around. They see themselves as some sort of state sanctioned "authority" which means, by definition they don't see themselves as equals of the citizen but rather having power over them. Regardless of the justification for this perception power. How is it any different to hold that view in reverse and to refute that claim of authority?
You really don't get it. I seriously doubt that many of us here go around doing things that would put us in a situation where we would have to. Still, that doesn't mean that I accept or agree with the idea that if someone is going to operate as a thug in the name of the State that the recourse should to have to accept that "authority" and plead before the Crown. A thug is still a thug even when they operate under the notion of "law".
I will take this a step further and say that I reject the notion of what passes for "law" in this nation today and that it is nothing but corruption and a cancer that needs to be excised. Having "elections" and all the other religious ceremonies are nothing more than a slight of hand that is designed to convince the masses of the legitimacy of having rulers. Think about it for a second - who the eff are these pompous dorks down in the state house that think they have any sort of ability to tell US where we have or don't have a privilege to arm ourselves for justified defense? The only reason they have that power is because folks are willing to give it to them. I am no longer and would gladly put my boot on their throat and reverse the role that they seem think is righteous and my position is that the cops that would defend them for a paycheck when that happens are just as bad as the politicians.
I wonder how many of them would concede any notion of their right to rule when their spine is about to be snapped?
They use force to assert their rule and try to claim that we must be constrained to reason. What's worse is that they hire their enforcers by using funds that they've stolen from us.
I don't think so. This needs to stop. This needs to change.
No, but I do agree with some of their principles.Your a sovereign citizen aren't you? Let you colors shine.
No, but I do agree with some of their principles.
I also think that this experiment of a republic called the United States has run it's course and it's time to move on. As I've said, I reject the idea that it is legitimate or even necessary to delude ourselves that we need rulers.
No "rulers", read laws... riigght. Take 300 million pieces of popcorn apply heat, use no lid, and expect them to exit the pot in an orderly fashion.No, but I do agree with some of their principles.
I also think that this experiment of a republic called the United States has run it's course and it's time to move on. As I've said, I reject the idea that it is legitimate or even necessary to delude ourselves that we need rulers.
Not exactly, he talks up to revolution but he knows where to draw the line. He always stops short of making an actual threat though he is starting to blur the lines.I've been on this site for 6 years, if you count the Canadian one. Guys have been talking revolution since I've been here and probably long before that. I wonder what they are waiting on?
Just wait til we get Krokodil over here
Shouldn't you be storming the State House instead of playing internet commando?
Yes by "regulating" Cannibis you open the door to all kinds of dangerous combinations of unnatural and unregulated compounds....It's here....been here since 2013 I believe.
And people are now using Carfentanil to get high...and dead.
The only issue I have with synthetic Marijuana is the ever-changing banned list, so the chemical compounds vary from bag to bag, so people have no clue what they're actually smoking. The bag looks the same but the product is way different.
Interesting that you seem to find it acceptable, at least to the point the citizen should willingly comply, that the cop committed a form of assault but then find the idea of using justified force against a perversion of power like was committed abhorrent.
Edit to add:
Yes and no. Yes the words are meant figuratively but I am also endorsing using physical force in defense against an illegitimate use of force even when the aggressor is operating under the flag of the State.
So going back through this thread, I ran across this gem.
So, using your argument, since we are "all equal under the law," would you acknowledge that if you stand for violence against the People, you don't have a leg to stand on to complain against violence coming from the People?
Sure. Of course you think there's an institutional opinion advocating for violence against "the People" so there's not really much to discuss. Just keep your "I'm better than LEOs because they are LEOs" attitude. There's obviously not a reasonable discussion to be had.