Why Carry a 1911? Gun Guys

It really does not take a lot IMHO. You need to start with high quality mags. From there you need to keep them clean and lubed properly. You also need to know how to tweak their extractors.

As people have tried to improve JMBs design to get more accuracy out of the gun they have made the fit and the finish tighter. It makes them more prone to running dry and dirt fouling causing stoppages. There is a reason that old Colts have bit of play. The most overrated "fit" on a 1911 is the slide to frame fit. People obsess about it but it really is secondary to how the barrel locks into the gun. The 3 items in bold below are the most important. Too many people sacrifice reliability for a tight slide to frame fit. IMHO


"The Colt .45 Automatic a Shop Manual, by Jerry Kuhnhausen; Section II, Shop Work; page 116.

Mechanical Accuracy / Mechanical Repeatability

Basic mechanical accurizing improvements and estimated individual effectiveness -

1. Minimize frame / slide clearance -- 15%
2. Install match grade barrel -- 10%
3. Fit / install accuracy bushing -- 20%
4. Minimum chamber headspace -- 10%
5. Eliminate rear barrel side play -- 20%
6. Consistent full barrel lug engagement -- 20%

7. Beyond reach -- 5%
Well said... I really need to get those books ones day. I want to assemble one from a slide and frame, just to say I've done it.... one day.
 
Well said... I really need to get those books ones day. I want to assemble one from a slide and frame, just to say I've done it.... one day.

Before he passed I wanted to do the Jim Garthwaite class but did not have the time or the cash. 😢

 
( when I say work, I dont mean sitting around "blue printing" it)

Well, its simple....

Ive watched a person purchase a $1500 1911, And put Promags in it because it was "cheaper".

Ive also had people bring them in unable to disassemble one for cleaning. Or in pieces oddly enough.

They do not seem to like being "dry" and will not tolerate it, from what I typically see... Ive had many brought in bone dry with a statement that "Thats how I keep my Glock/Etc"

Its just a case of treating it like what it is: An all steel ( sometimes aluminum... saw a poly frame once) pistol, that has certain proclivities due its status as the last "early" semi still in common use... they are just not Glocks.

Find the good mags it likes and keep them around and well maintained. Learn how to take it apart, and be comfortable doing so. Keep it properly oiled with something that "sticks", ESSPECIALLY if your carrying it IWB.... a little grease on the rails ( I love old-school gunslick, just never use it on aluminum frames if you luck into some... any decent grease works well.) Is a good idea, but not strictly necessary if you have it oiled well.

Learn how to keep an eye out for the little "ticks" they have... a clocking extractor can be irritating, but is typically not hard to fix. Alot of people these days may take it to a "gunsmith" that throws in some other extractor, with no regard to its tension or what not, and then when it still doesnt work, the owner is now soured on it.

BUT, a solid functional 1911 that runs well, as long as you give it good mags, and that receives proper care and the owner learns its quirks, it is a fine handgun.

Its just not as "simple" as a "modern" handgun.
I agree with mags, mags, mags. And oil. My 9mm STI 1911 would only function properly with Wilson Combat mags. Any other I tried would never lock back consistently.

My Sig 1911 doesn’t seem to be as picky.

As far as oil, I never run any gun super dry. It’s not that hard to oil them……
 
Last edited:
Because it is the platform I am most familiar and comfortable with. I learned with one 40 some years back and it is second nature. Sure I might have to do mag changes more often but I am way more co doing so. It might take a little more love but so does my aging body. Now push come to shove I have trained enough with other platforms be it revolver or semi-auto I can work with something else but a 1911 is allows me to concentrate more on what in front of me rather what’s in my hands.
 
I’ve never had trouble as long as it’s chambered in .45acp.

It’s not a very practical firearm as far as price goes, but my new Wilson EDCx9 might be the solution to that 9mm 1911 problem. Damn it shoots well. It’s like a 1911 trigger mated with a CZ’s reliability. Crazy.

Yeah it should shoot well for the price I know. But it was a cheaper mid life crisis than a bike or girlfriend.
 
I carry various 1911 pistols of three different sizes and two different chamberings because I want to do so. That is all the justification I really need. I also carry a P365 and several J-Frames for the same reason. I have tried several others but have always come back to those mentioned above.

I generally open carry a large single or double action revolver in 44 Mag or 45 Colt when I am at the farm.
 
This is the one I don't get.
I've shot one for years, ipsc, idpa and if it was unreliable I'd have given up on it years ago but then again I run ball ammo

You don't get it because you understand that a 1911 made to specifications works as designed, while those which deviate from the specifications have a greater chance of problems.

The plain fact of the matter is that if the 1911 was really plagued with such problems, the gun wouldn't have survived for 110 years and wouldn't still be in production today.
 
It’s not a very practical firearm as far as price goes, but my new Wilson EDCx9 might be the solution to that 9mm 1911 problem. Damn it shoots well. It’s like a 1911 trigger mated with a CZ’s reliability. Crazy.

Yeah it should shoot well for the price I know. But it was a cheaper mid life crisis than a bike or girlfriend.

Have you met my friend the Browning Hi Power bought to you by Ted Yost....?

HcnqWsW.jpg


Or his buddy from Don Williams

ZBmsiSA.jpg
 
Only reason to carry a 1911 in .45 is because they don't make a 1912 in .46.

All of my 1911s are 10MM. It appeals to me as a platform because it's a way to conceal carry 10MM without having a gigantic gun and without having too light of a gun for the cartridge.

Also, my Ruger SR1911s have never had a stoppage. My DW is the picky princess.

My 1991A1 is 13 mm.

😁 😁 😁
 
1911s are for people who are willing to put in the work to keep them going

Would.you please explain exactly what work is needed to keep them going for the new 1911 people?

Even better, would you please explain exactly what work is need to keep them going for the old 1911 people?

Your subsequent post doesn't describe "quirks", it describes "taking care of your pistol". Using quality magazines and properly lubricating your pistol aren't "quirks".

;)
 
Last edited:
Even better, would you please explain exactly what work is need to keep them going for the old 1911 people?

Your subsequent post doesn't describe "quirks", it describes "taking care of your pistol". Using quality magazines and properly lubricating your pistol aren't "quirks".

;)

I think the misconception comes where older firearms require standard upkeep. Nothing flashy, nothing special. Just lube, clean, and take care of it.

But to people who enjoy dropping their plastic pistols in mud and sand to prove it still runs and say things like “what? We are supposed to clean these things? Harharhar” often think “standard maintenance” = quirky.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I think the misconception comes where older firearms require standard upkeep. Nothing flashy, nothing special. Just lube, clean, and take care of it.

But to people who enjoy dropping their plastic pistols in mud and sand to prove it still runs and say things like “what? We are supposed to clean these things? Harharhar” often think “standard maintenance” = quirky.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Also the standard for "reliability" has changed. What was considered reliable for a military side arm then is considered a failure by the internet gun culture of today.
 
Have you met my friend the Browning Hi Power bought to you by Ted Yost....?

HcnqWsW.jpg


Or his buddy from Don Williams

ZBmsiSA.jpg

I will say that my experience with the EDC-X9 has been 100% positive. I just shoot the BHP better.
 
I want a nice BHP as one of my next pistols. They are so pretty.

Thank you. Those were done by IMHO 2 of the best BHP smiths alive. Don Williams and Ted Yost. I am lucky to own 3 Don Williams BHPs and 1 Yost. To stay on topic I also own a Don Williams 1911 and will have a Yost 1911 in early 2022. Both men are old school craftsmen when it comes to 1911s and BHPs. This is my Don Williams 1911s. #100%reliable

uJJO28H.jpg


RJAsAs8.jpg


YijqRWk.jpg
 
Last edited:
Owned three, shot three, had three fail within the first 500 rounds. On the boutique end they are over priced and unreliable. One the entry level end they are reasonably priced and unreliable. I will not say that I will never own another one, but it is going have to run head to head with HK, Sig and Glock for the same round counts and no cleanings. If it can't do that it needs to be in someone else's safe. I have little patience for things that are not reliable.
 
And that's as good a reason to buy a gun as any!

They have gotten crazy expensive. People now consider them "collectible" because they are no longer being made but the reality is they are one of the most prolific guns ever produced. I was talking to Mr. Yost about them the other day and I said there are caches of them all over the world and they will keep finding them and importing them forever. They are valuable but they are not rare. He replied "After a nuclear apocalypse they will find cockroaches living in Browning High Powers all over the planet." I just laughed because it is true.
 
But where can I buy a new one for under $1000.00 I have been looking everywhere for the Regent copy

The Regents are all gone and do not over pay. The Turks build guns in batched much like Colt and CZ. They piggyback commercial guns on large Govt contract orders. You will not see Regent/Tisas BHPs back in the US until someone places a large contract order. Then they will run some for the US market. The same think was true of the MKE/Zenith MP5 Clones.

The reality is that with BHPs you need to have $$$ in hand and you need to watch a lot of auctions. You need to know what you are looking at and when to walk away. For example this was a decent deal.


pix601782126.jpg


100% sure it was a Coles Distribution Surplus gun but it was in decent condition. Send it to Novak or someone to get the slide milled and new sights installed with a sear hammer and trigger job and you would be good to go under $1000.
 
Last edited:
And that's as good a reason to buy a gun as any!

They are one of the most prolific designs ever put into production. The numbers of 1911s produced vs the number of FN BHPs and their clones is not even a contest. I would estimate there are at least 5 BHPs in existence for every 1 1911. Don't get me wrong I love them both. They are both ahead of their time. The locked breech design of the BHP is the design what most modern semi auto pistol are built on. We live in a Glock world but before there was a Glock we lived in a Browning World. IMHO
 
Last edited:
Even better, would you please explain exactly what work is need to keep them going for the old 1911 people?

Your subsequent post doesn't describe "quirks", it describes "taking care of your pistol". Using quality magazines and properly lubricating your pistol aren't "quirks".

;)
Touche' lol

They arent really "quirks" in that sense... just stuff people dont seem to be willing to do.

Some others beat me to it as you may have seen :)
 
The day someone in the mid-market range ($800-$1,400) makes an optics-ready 9mm Commander, I might dip my toes back into 1911s.

I have a decent little cache of 9mm Wilson ETMs, but the old Colt Commander I have has the early internally-lightened slide… so no meat for optic milling.

If I’m being completely honest with myself, I’ll probably still get a Glock 48 MOS instead.
 
The day someone in the mid-market range ($800-$1,400) makes an optics-ready 9mm Commander, I might dip my toes back into 1911s.

I have a decent little cache of 9mm Wilson ETMs, but the old Colt Commander I have has the early internally-lightened slide… so no meat for optic milling.

If I’m being completely honest with myself, I’ll probably still get a Glock 48 MOS instead.
100% I am not looking to shoe horn modern optic solutions onto a 100+ year old platform.
 
100% I am not looking to shoe horn modern optic solutions onto a 100+ year old platform.

That's sort of where I'm landing on it. A decently built 1911 is a joy to shoot, but between most manufacturers (even top-tier ones) being unable to fit lower and upper barrel lugs, barrel links, and extractors with any modicum of consistency... and no consistency between manufacturers' barrel ramp setups... and no factory optics anywhere in the midmarket? I'll deal with less-perfect triggers every day so I don't have to keep a gunsmith on retainer for a carry gun.

5" .45s not included in those gripes, of course. They'll feed and extract just about any roundish bullet as long as they're fitted somewhat close to correctly and stuffed with a quality magazine. But, I cannot justify carrying a skinny big-bore revolver that weighs over 40 ounces.
 
Last edited:
Honestly it all comes down to the trigger. 100+ years later everyone is still chasing JMBs ghost. I don't carry one anymore but dollar for dollar it is still the best design in the safe for me. They are the trigger that all others are judge against. YMMV
 
Back
Top Bottom