That has been my experience as well. My Sig 226 is my favorite handgun i own. I shoot the glock 17 and 21 sf well but the sig is a lot better.I like the X-Ten better. I have smaller hands and it fits me much better. And I think the trigger is much better on the Sig as well.
Depends on what you're shooting. Off-the-shelf 10mm is wimpy. Handloaded 10mm can be pretty intense.I think everyone thinks the 10mm will kick harder than it does.
Ordering reloading dies now so will be ready for the outcome lol.
Depends on what you're shooting. Off-the-shelf 10mm is wimpy. Handloaded 10mm can be pretty intense.
I have both, both shoot great. I have large hands, I can grip both well. It really comes down to personal choice. For a while back in early 2000's I shot IDPA with a G20. The 10mm didn't hold me back at all.Thinking about buying either a Glock 20 or a P320 xten. Anyone have an opinion that has both or shot both? I have several Sigs and several Glocks, shoot both equally.
I’ve used/carried the Rock Island 10mm 1911s to good effect in AlaskaGood timing. Shopping for a 1911 10mm as we speak.
Whichever platform you go with, either handload or buy from folks like Underwood or Buffalo Bore, as they are some of the exceedingly few manufacturers who load factory 10mm to what it should beThinking about buying either a Glock 20 or a P320 xten. Anyone have an opinion that has both or shot both? I have several Sigs and several Glocks, shoot both equally.
Most off the shelf 10mm is, unfortunate to say, which is a bit of a disservice to the caliber imo. The exceptions to that circumstance I’ve had the most experience with are Underwood and Buffalo BoreDepends on what you're shooting. Off-the-shelf 10mm is wimpy. Handloaded 10mm can be pretty intense.
They don't load it right? Why would that be?Whichever platform you go with, either handload or buy from folks like Underwood or Buffalo Bore, as they are some of the exceedingly few manufacturers who load factory 10mm to what it should be
I couldn’t quite tell you why they do it that way honestly. However, a glance at even just box ballistics was telling enough at the time for quick selection.They don't load it right? Why would that be?
Does not apply to Underwood Ammo's 10mm offerings. . Be warned though that it splits the case maybe 1/4 of the time in a G20.Depends on what you're shooting. Off-the-shelf 10mm is wimpy. Handloaded 10mm can be pretty intense.
I think i will just need to see which one fits my hands the best and i can point the best based on these responses. Pretty much what you can say about any gun purchase. I appreciate all the responses.I have both, both shoot great. I have large hands, I can grip both well. It really comes down to personal choice. For a while back in early 2000's I shot IDPA with a G20. The 10mm didn't hold me back at all.
For 10mm 1911 I have found swapping in a flat firing pin stop and heavier mainspring (not recoil spring) helpful to slow down rearward slide travel. I’m really surprised how little “tuning” most 1911 manufacturers put into their 10mm variants. It seems most folks reach for a heavier recoil spring which could also help but I’d rather just slow down the slide’s rearward travel instead of shortening cycling time and having a harsh forward impulse.
A small radius to break the edge, doesn't take much.Hmmm, an interesting approach I hadn't thought about. By "flat" you mean the bottom edge is squared off/not contoured? Causing more initial friction?
A small radius to break the edge, doesn't take much.
I like the Harrison ones for a small radius unit, but the Wilson ones are not bad either.
It makes a difference in ANY 1911, not just a 10mm.
A completely flat "square" one would still work, but it would be a little stiffer.Oh yeah I follow there, I have always understood that is optimum, but for smooth functioning.
What I am trying to understand is by 92G leaving it flat, is that a strategy to slow down the slide recoiling impulse, ie making it harder to initially overcome, a normally undesirable characteristic, but with 10mm one that is unlikely to cause an issue.
I may be completely misreading here too, so please correct me if I am tracking wrong.
Hmmm, an interesting approach I hadn't thought about. By "flat" you mean the bottom edge is squared off/not contoured? Causing more initial friction?
The flat (non rounded) FPS gets less leverage on the hammer, which in effect requires more rearward force to overcome the hammer. The problem is that is can be sort of tough to rack with the hammer down, but it definitely helped keep my 10mm brass from flinging into the next county and tamed the recoil impulse a bit. I’ve only used a flat FPS for the 10mm 1911 ad haven’t needed for other chamberings.
Well dang, that is neato.
Browning's original stop had a 5/64ths radius on the bottom corner. It was changed by the US Army in January 1918 to the now standard 7/32nds after complaints of the pistols being hard to manually cycle with the hammer down. Whenever I fit one, I go a little smaller...about 1/16th...though I've never measured it precisely, so it will vary a little...but 1/16th is close enough to call it that.Looping in @John Travis as he can hopefully weigh in on this question.
“…or worse…full auto.”I’m far from an expert on pistol tuning, but enjoy tinkering within the limits of safety. My observation is the SAO action of a 1911 offers a range of tuning points probably because the springs act independently from each other. This is contrast to a striker action where the recoil spring must overcome the striker spring to achieve “cocking” upon battery. In the case of 10mm where energy can range from 400 to 700 ft-lbs, a one-size-fits-all setup is probably going to fall short. Thankfully the 1911 is so easy to tune the hammer spring and FPS that rearward slide travel can be delayed. Of course recoil isn’t technically changed, but the abruptness of recoil impulse from a rapidly moving slide can be addressed. Now one issue I’m not sure about is whether there’s any risk with upping the hammer spring. For example, could a stronger hammer spring allow the hammer to “out run” the sear and lead to hammer follow or worse…full auto. I doubt it but I don’t know. Looping in @John Travis as he can hopefully weigh in on this question.
I just saw this, and figgered I'd respond.For example, could a stronger hammer spring allow the hammer to “out run” the sear and lead to hammer follow or worse