Johnny Cake to be exact.sugar in "cornbread" makes it cake.
Johnny Cake to be exact.sugar in "cornbread" makes it cake.
Right , cant we discuss raising hayul and eating cornbread? And if it's got sugar in it it sure as hayul ain't cornbread.
This could replace our tired, old meringue vs whipped cream on bananner pudding debate.sugar in "cornbread" makes it cake.
I'm in the "I don't care I will eat it" camp just like I am with nanner pudding.This could replace our tired, old meringue vs whipped cream on bananner pudding debate.
I’m too partisan in my bannaner pudding tastes to be as egalitarian.I'm in the "I don't care I will eat it" camp just like I am with nanner pudding.
I’m to partisan in my bannaner pudding tastes to be as egalitarian.
I'm a pleb. I see cornbread, I eat it. I see banana pudding, I eat it.I’m too partisan in my bannaner pudding tastes to be as egalitarian.
Never fear, you have ALL the necessary traits to make a fine example of a cranky old bastage when your time comes.I'm a pleb. I see cornbread, I eat it. I see banana pudding, I eat it.
My wife says I'm already there.Never fear, you have ALL the necessary traits to make a fine example of a cranky old bastage when your time comes.
*
*courtesy smiley face added...as a courtesy
I knew you had it in you.My wife says I'm already there.
That's what she said!I knew you had it in you.
I don't know about that.
@ant1vaxx3r
Don't let this discussion die because of a cold reception followed by 5 pages of off-topic tripe. I'll revive the esoteric. Are you the brain in a jar, or am I?
Personally, I struggle with trusting superior beings that don't know how to use spell-check.is almost magically alwaya correct,
That's an offal joke.
@ant1vaxx3r
Don't let this discussion die because of a cold reception followed by 5 pages of off-topic tripe. I'll revive the esoteric. Are you the brain in a jar, or am I?
I reread this thread and have come to the conclusion that antivaxxxer is well crafted tanstaafl parody/troll.
It may be like the "data driven" science of the "china virus"...you know the data that they shut down whole countries for. Data that later, when some scientists tried to go back and replicate...it wasn't possible. "Trust the science" they say. It's "just a mask" they say. Those are "peaceful protests".To be clear..."data driven" means absolutely nothing unless the data can be cited, sourced, backed up, cross checked, and verified.
What I am basically seeing is "We all gonna die." "Says who?" "The data!" "What data?" "The data they have." "What data do they have?" "The data driven on that site."
Is it possible? Yes, and technically it is also possible that I win the lottery five times in row while being bitten by a shark and struck by lightening.
Vanity! Vain things.And in the long run, what does it really matter? None of us get out alive. We either live eternity with God or we do not.
The Bible says that when we leave this life we (Jesus accepting individuals) are instantly with him.
Does it get any better?
So we get raptured out first, middle or last (different views), we die in a fire fight, a war, from old age, fighting over the last pound of CFE223 or whatever --- What does any of it matter?
Again, the problem is that without saying how they got to those numbers the numbers mean absolutely nothing. No one said that it wasn't for the whole world. The USA was being addressed due to us living here. So tell me, can you see on that website what caused the massive die off.It may be like the "data driven" science of the "china virus"...you know the data that they shut down whole countries for. Data that later, when some scientists tried to go back and replicate...it wasn't possible. "Trust the science" they say. It's "just a mask" they say. Those are "peaceful protests".
Either mine own eyes are deceiving me, or the whole world has gone mad.
Which scientists do you trust?
What data can be trusted today?
Whose data? Whose scientists?
I had seen up on the thread where someone commented on this being just for the US. It's not! Go to deagle.com and look at the projections for the UK and various other surrounding countries. Is it legit? God only knows...or some other "insiders", but literally, as we speak, our own country is burning. WE ARE AT WAR!!!
And few believe this... because no one "official" has told us.
Do you trust MSM?
Do you trust governments?
Did you know that government literally means mind control?
Most can agree we are already in a "cold civil war". Cold???
Cannon Hinant
David Dorn
Aaron "Jay" Danielson...and I'm sure there's many, many other casualties already from this "cold civil war" already.
How many children will be murdered?
How many of our LEO will be shot, murdered in the street before the masses see?
How many father's, walking their daughters in the street, will be gunned down, due to a hate crime?
In case most didn't know.
THE NEWS IS FAKE!
THE WAR IS REAL!
"That website"... means absolutely nothing to me, except for the FACT that it's fear porn. What I do see, is the beginning stages of that "final battle" WW3.Again, the problem is that without saying how they got to those numbers the numbers mean absolutely nothing. No one said that it wasn't for the whole world. The USA was being addressed due to us living here. So tell me, can you see on that website what caused the massive die off.
Which scientists do you trust?
The stuff I can verify.What data can be trusted today?
Whose data? Whose scientists?
Where did you get the idea that I think you're wrong? Wrong about what?None of them. I have worked in too many research labs for that.
The stuff I can verify.
again, I think these are the wrong questions. The way I hear you asking (and I might be wrong, this is the internet after all!), you are asking who is the winner in the "trustworthiness" beauty walk? My wife and I have this convo all the time. I just don't wanna join a tribe. I don't.
The most difficult and abstract issues can -if the person talking about them is smart enough and is good enough teacher- break down issues into simple to understand concepts, and then point you to the raw data to get it yourself..... Trust THAT data, and then line up FOR THAT ISSUE with the tribe that seems most conformed to what appears to me to be correct. That is as close as I wanna get.
Some things, like string theory and other difficult to grasp issues (at least difficult for me!! lol) do require a certain level of trust in people to explain things, but even then if I can't understand the big picture and have some general idea of what is going on, and how to falsify the theory (THIS IS HUGE), then it may not be that the idea is right or wrong, but that I am just too stupid to have a valid opinion. I plan to shut up on stuff like that, and what is more, I expect (pitiful fool that I am! lol) others to do the same! I can certainly have an opinion, and in the age of the internet, can deposit it out there and invite everyone to observe my fresh turd on the sidewalk.... all of my own making.... but it does not give it any value at all, nor do I think you owe me "respect" for being stupid. It is better to ask than argue in a situation like that. I might say "I have a position I hold and it conflicts with what you are saying, but I am not sure how to demonstrate you are wrong. Please explain why you think I am wrong." I have had wonderfully enlightening conversations with people this way and learned a ton of stuff. Sometimes I have wound up changing my mind, sometimes I have discovered the prejudices of others way smarter than me, and sometimes I just have to put things "on hold" awaiting further light.
This is one reason why -opinionated as I am (and I know I am!)- you generally won't find me bloviating about stuff I just have not bothered to read up on. No one knows everything, someone is always going to be smarter than I am on some issue(s), and while I delight to share what I have learned, as well as to learn things I know zero about. It is not a dishonor to say "I am really ignorant here." Issues here on gardening and various firearms things have been a gold mine to me. Members are willing to divulge helpful info in an almost shameless manner. It is great.
I was confused by the rest of the comments in the post.
Where did you get the idea that I think you're wrong? Wrong about what?
I for sure can admit when I'm wrong, and if you feel I am...please explain?
I know I can be an idiot at times, and more times than not, "not the sharpest tool in the shed". I'm just a little confused on what exactly mine and your disagreement is about.
You do not believe we're in a cold civil war now???
It was mentioned in the thread that an EMP could bring about the death of 90% of the American population. You do know that Iran has threatened such an act? Right?
Everything is a "conspiracy theory" today. Yet it's no secret what the "globalists" hope to achieve, and it all seems to line up with scripture.
What comments have I made that seem to confuse you?
That is a dumb statement!if this guy joined the forum to cause a problem, we don't need that shit around here; especially when you start insulting people's intelligence, that's when you know they've lost
that made me chuckle, because it happens A LOTThat is a dumb statement!
just kidding. seemed appropriate.
BTW i wasn't talking about you, Tans, i was talking about you know whoThat is a dumb statement!
just kidding. seemed appropriate.
I think you are preaching to the wrong choir. I think most here are concerned about the future. The person that started this thread bailed when he couldn't back up his claims. As tans said, I trust data that can be corroborated, and the random website this guy brought up had zero data backing it up. You're redirecting the conversation which is fine, but what you said has little to do with the initial direction of this thread before it got derailed multiple times."That website"... means absolutely nothing to me, except for the FACT that it's fear porn. What I do see, is the beginning stages of that "final battle" WW3.
Can we agree on this? Maybe not, but that's just my opinion. I'm not saying you, but a whole lot of people seem to suffering from cognitive dissonance, as well as stockholm syndrome. I do see a large mass of people, all over the world waking up to this... metaphorical "Matrix" that has been pushed on unsuspecting masses for thousands of years, and there's the danger. Yet again, that's just my opinion, and we all know about opinions...
I don't need "the science", or the data to prove to me something is inheritanly wrong here. Will we all be dead by 2025? I don't know, and neither does the developer of this "population forecast", but here's a good example.
California says; "we don't need God here"
God says okay!
https://images.app.goo.gl/R5UPvHvdgRR8j34ZA
The owners, or controllers, don't want you to see, and ask questions.
What do we have when freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion is suppressed? The people that know what is taking place know...we have to rebel, or remain a slave. The choice is yours, and that's all you really have.
Do you really believe your free?
What do you really own?
No. I don’t think he did.did he say something?
I think you are preaching to the wrong choir. I think most here are concerned about the future. The person that started this thread bailed when he couldn't back up his claims. As tans said, I trust data that can be corroborated, and the random website this guy brought up had zero data backing it up. You're redirecting the conversation which is fine, but what you said has little to do with the initial direction of this thread before it got derailed multiple times.