I was gonna start a new thread but realized this basically covered what I had to say, in that today I built my first lower on an aero m4e1 and love how convenient it is in regards to the bolt catch being screwed in, and also the option to screw in the rear detent. I've typically used psa lowers in the past, but after this build I probably won't go back. And also the built in trigger guard which is also nice. I've lost count to how many lowers I have either built myself or helped new people starting out. But I am sold on aero lowers going forward. Less than an hour to assemble the lower, slap on the upper and test fire 3 rounds. This particular upper came as a kit from PSA with a vortex strike eagle. I've decided to not mount the optic and let the end user decide if they want me to do it, or if they wanna take it somewhere to get it mounted and bore sighted
View attachment 559456
View attachment 559457
I found this helpful info about .308 Winchester caliber AR-10 style rifles. If using a carbine length butt stock (collapsible), a typical buffer combination is a special ".308 spring" and a shorter (2.5") and heavier (4oz) buffer.Years ago I bought a complete PSA 308 carbine and its been problematic. I still say its the chamber. Its too tight. Going from a carbine butt stock and buffer system to a rifle length butt stock and buffer system helped a lot but not completely.
Personally it's worth the cost difference to me.I came here to ask the same question so instead of starting another thread, I'll tag in here. My question is more specific to the standard ARs (not AR10) and complete parts (uppers and lowers) rather than stripped receivers.
I am looking to put together a 300blk pistol that will be SBRed. An upper and lower from PSA is around $650. An upper and lower from Aero is closer to $800. Is it worth the difference?
How about customer service? I've heard good and bad about both companies.
I've seen a lot of people suggest the opposite...that a PSA lower with an Aero upper is preferred. I took it to suggest that the lower is simpler and less likely to cause functionality issues than the upper and that PSA's lowers are very comparable to Aero's. 🤷♂️I would say at least get the lower from aero
I've never had any issues from PSA regardless. I just like the aero lower features better, built in trigger guard, threaded holes for the rear detent spring and threaded bolt catch. And I think aeros magwells have more of a flare. More specifically the m4e1 modelI've seen a lot of people suggest the opposite...that a PSA lower with an Aero upper is preferred. I took it to suggest that the lower is simpler and less likely to cause functionality issues than the upper and that PSA's lowers are very comparable to Aero's. 🤷♂️
I would recommend an Aero M4E1 receiver set and a Ballistic Advantage Hanson barrel.
I would recommend an Aero M4E1 receiver set and a Ballistic Advantage Hanson barrel.
I have a lower that I may use. In that case, I would likely prefer to buy a complete upper. I know that BA makes barrels for Aero but does Aero offer complete uppers with the BA Hanson barrel? Their website is unclear.Agree..
Have 2 rigs built as described and couldn't be happier.