Article: Oregon Judge rules new gun rules do not violate the Constitution

Button Pusher

Button Pusher

Well-Known Member
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Benefactor
Life Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2017
Messages
29,455
Location
Raleigh
Rating - 100%
34   0   0
Interesting that criminals use these magazines.

Large capacity magazines “are not commonly used for self-defense, and are therefore not protected by the Second Amendment,” Immergut wrote.

www.opb.org

Federal judge says Oregon’s new gun rules don’t violate US Constitution

In a 122-page written order issued late Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut found banning large capacity magazines and requiring a permit to purchase a firearm are in keeping with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms...
www.opb.org
 
Last edited:
Diablos said:
more half measure bs by scotus. they need to just come out and say what the plain meaning of the 2nd clearly states and then tell these morons if they want to infringe the only legal way to do so is to amend the constitution.
Click to expand...
What if SCOTUS knew the antis rootless react exactly as expected, b it didn't want to sound like conspiracy theorists by stating this in the opinion. They warned that the states cannot just create blanket "safe zones" (for criminals). They knew the states would pass more infringements in the name of safety and just change a few words.
Now, when these cases come back to SCOTUS, it is not just a theory. It is fact that antis, if given an inch, will take a mile.
At that point they have the ammunition needed to void all permitting requirements. The question is, will democrats try to pack t the court with communists before the cases get there.
 
fishgutzy said:
What if SCOTUS knew the antis rootless react exactly as expected, b it didn't want to sound like conspiracy theorists by stating this in the opinion. They warned that the states cannot just create blanket "safe zones" (for criminals). They knew the states would pass more infringements in the name of safety and just change a few words.
Now, when these cases come back to SCOTUS, it is not just a theory. It is fact that antis, if given an inch, will take a mile.
At that point they have the ammunition needed to void all permitting requirements. The question is, will democrats try to pack t the court with communists before the cases get there.
Click to expand...

the theory you forward has already been proven. see dismantling of the 4th by the police state
 
fishgutzy said:
What if SCOTUS knew the antis rootless react exactly as expected, b it didn't want to sound like conspiracy theorists by stating this in the opinion. They warned that the states cannot just create blanket "safe zones" (for criminals). They knew the states would pass more infringements in the name of safety and just change a few words.
Now, when these cases come back to SCOTUS, it is not just a theory. It is fact that antis, if given an inch, will take a mile.
At that point they have the ammunition needed to void all permitting requirements. The question is, will democrats try to pack t the court with communists before the cases get there.
Click to expand...
From John Robert’s past I have a hard time believing he wants his court to be that type of activist court.
 
Since law enforcement has no legal duty to protect the general citizenry, their firearms must be for self defense.

LE firearms use high capacity magazines.

Therefore, high capacity magazines are in common use for self defense.
 
Button Pusher said:
Interesting that criminals use these magazines.

Large capacity magazines “are not commonly used for self-defense, and are therefore not protected by the Second Amendment,” Immergut wrote.

www.opb.org

Federal judge says Oregon’s new gun rules don’t violate US Constitution

In a 122-page written order issued late Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut found banning large capacity magazines and requiring a permit to purchase a firearm are in keeping with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms...
www.opb.org
Click to expand...
Well then. This just means this “judge” is wrong, doesn’t it.
 
Last edited:
The Pacific NW used to be cool. Seattle, WA and Portland, OR were great places to visit and then head out into the mountains. What the hell happened?
 
Ferrisfan said:
Since law enforcement has no legal duty to protect the general citizenry, their firearms must be for self defense.

LE firearms use high capacity magazines.

Therefore, high capacity magazines are in common use for self defense.
Click to expand...
That is a fantastically logical argument that I have never heard before or thought of. Brilliant.
 
Ferrisfan said:
Since law enforcement has no legal duty to protect the general citizenry, their firearms must be for self defense.

LE firearms use high capacity magazines.

Therefore, high capacity magazines are in common use for self defense.
Click to expand...
Either that, or LE are criminals.

More and more, I'm leaning towards the latter
 
fishgutzy said:
Now, when these cases come back to SCOTUS, it is not just a theory.
Click to expand...
And one strongly worded letter didn't get the point across. How is another going to help?

They're simply not going to comply and will continue to tyrant. No amount of "court" is going to change that, only force will.
 
Last edited:
'well-regulated' means 'properly equipped and competently trained'

this has to do, then, with the "properly equipped" part

it is hard to imagine that anyone would think a firearm with magazine capacity of ten rounds or less constitutes "properly equipped"

therefore

the ruling directly violates the Constitution, prima facie
 
jimmyjames8 said:
The Pacific NW used to be cool. Seattle, WA and Portland, OR were great places to visit and then head out into the mountains. What the hell happened?
Click to expand...
It went to hell around 2011 with the occupy portland movement.
So glad we abandoned ship in 2014.

These retards don't get it. Inhave friends who bitch about how bad downtown is, then either dont vote, or vote for these idiots who let it happen. <facepalm>
 
Last edited:
Button Pusher said:
Interesting that criminals use these magazines.

Large capacity magazines “are not commonly used for self-defense, and are therefore not protected by the Second Amendment,” Immergut wrote.

www.opb.org

Federal judge says Oregon’s new gun rules don’t violate US Constitution

In a 122-page written order issued late Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut found banning large capacity magazines and requiring a permit to purchase a firearm are in keeping with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms...
www.opb.org
Click to expand...
oh for the love of Mike.
 
Dave951 said:
Any info on the judge who rendered such an astute opinion?
Click to expand...
She was a leftist lawyer who made the mistake of working for Ken Starr; she had to re-register as a Republican so anyone would give her a job. Oregon's leftist Senators love her (which should tell you all you need to know), so Trump relented and nominated her to the bench.
 
Last edited:
Look for the Supreme Court to use the Rahimi case to tell the lower courts that they meant what they said in Bruen, as well as to dispel the notion that the Second Amendment says anything about "law-abiding citizens."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom