Alabamacoastie
Adiutor vicinorum
Puddle Pirate
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Life Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
I'm so tired of hearing about all these people's feelings...
Biden to unveil long-awaited executive action on guns
- Thread starter Combat Diver
- Start date
- Replies 223
- Views 10,239
Long_Hunter
Sufficient Speed, Acceptable Drag
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
I think I was about 10 when I bought my first rifle, a 22 remington at a yard sale, and I would buy boxes of 22 at the gas station...that was the early 70s
He was at Waco also...6.) The President will nominate David Chipman to serve as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.
According to the White House:
It should be noted that Chipman served an important role in the coverup of the Oklahoma City Bombing and the First World Trade Center bombing and is now serving an even more important role in the war against American citizens.
From:
Biden Just Declared 'War' On Millions Of Law-Abiding Gun Owners | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
12151791
GUNS AND COFFEE
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
maybe a reporter will ask Biden if the 13th Amendment is absolute and watch him answer with that scrambled brain.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 2,567
Where is the NRA in all of this?
They should be on every available media outlet with lawyers and a plan to fight this. Nope, nada, just more advertising wanting your money.
They should be on every available media outlet with lawyers and a plan to fight this. Nope, nada, just more advertising wanting your money.
Was Hunter with him?
Interesting times for sure. The quote about no amendment is absolute scares me more than any other quote.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
this is mega true, and the only way to combat this is the public harassment and shaming of anyone who goes for the "free stamp." collectivized efforts against tyrannical institutions only work if the collective is unified. also just for the record, a magpul CTR stock is half the price of an SB Tactical brace. And remember, the brace was the compromise. not another inch.
backwoodsshooter
there’s always a method to the madness
They have already started.
Through their actions, The Uniparty has been complaisant in limiting and destroying our First Amendment Rights by ignoring Section 230 to rein in Big Tech.
IMO Big Tech has become an extension of > Dot Bro <.
Welcome to the Machine
concepthomes2
When do we start?
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Multi-Factor Enabled
I swear, I’d have to have the comprehension of Forest Gump to understand some of what you post.
Simple
k.i.s.S
Studentofthegun
From the Land of White Pine and Moonshine
Staff member
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
Even if one contends that rights recognized by the Constitution are not absolute, it does NOT mean that the edicts issued by the Executive Branch have any merit at all. Nor does any past infringement automatically justice future infringement. And that also goes for Congress.
The onus for proving a right should be curtailed is not on proponents of the 2A. The onus is, and always should be, on those who propose it. This goes for the curtailment of any right, and most especially those within the Bill of Rights.
NONE of those Executive Orders will do anything substantive to reduce crime. They are not deterrents to criminals. They are only further regulation imposed on the law-abiding.
The phrase "shall not be infringed" cannot be ignored.
Free tax stamps sound fun, but does that mean that they’ll be asking us to serialize the accessory?
I might make 100 arm braces from 2x4s and file just for the heck of it, don’t even own an AR pistol at this point.
I might make 100 arm braces from 2x4s and file just for the heck of it, don’t even own an AR pistol at this point.
Alabamacoastie
Adiutor vicinorum
Puddle Pirate
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Life Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
Last edited:
Studentofthegun
From the Land of White Pine and Moonshine
Staff member
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
I seriously doubt it'll be free. In fact I thought I read somewhere that they already had plans for the revenue. Specifically so that they could staff the NFA branch. Which, if you think about it makes sense. It's tax revenue for the ATF, imposes a burden on gun owners, and paves the way to put AR-15s and who knows what else on the NFA Registry.
colion noir’s most recent videos are pretty essential and he’s pumping them out nonstop. i would say any pro 2A citizen should be sharing and proliferating his most recent work regarding the rhetoric that the biden administration is peddling.
Last edited:
BigWaylon
Head philatelist
Staff member
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
The $200 currently doesn’t go to the ATF. It goes into the general fund.
The last proposal around braces was going to include tax-free registration. Who knows what this one will offer...
Studentofthegun
From the Land of White Pine and Moonshine
Staff member
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
I'm well aware of that. But I don't think it is far fetched for them to simply say they will allocate funds where they see fit, and "redirect" those funds to the ATF. It is more about perception. Soccer moms have no problem with the government making gun owners "pay" for all these grandiose ideas, even if that's not precisely how it works.
Either way, it is coming out of the taxpayer's pocket.
Studentofthegun
From the Land of White Pine and Moonshine
Staff member
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
Yeah, you're right. Sorry about that. I've developed a first rate headache watching the eForm blue dial spin.
“I am calling on Congress to enact commonsense gun law reforms, including requiring background checks on all gun sales, banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and eliminating immunity for gun manufacturers who knowingly put weapons of war on our streets,” Biden said.
So does this from the whitehouse mean what it says?
“ The Justice Department, within 60 days, will issue a proposed rule to make clear when a device marketed as a stabilizing brace effectively turns a pistol into a short-barreled rifle subject to the requirements of the National Firearms Act.”
This doesn’t say that braces will be banned, or even that they turn a pistol into an SBR, it says that the rule will make it clear WHEN a brace makes a pistol into an SBR. Maybe the language is just sloppy, but this makes me expect yet another reversal on shouldering.
“ The Justice Department, within 60 days, will issue a proposed rule to make clear when a device marketed as a stabilizing brace effectively turns a pistol into a short-barreled rifle subject to the requirements of the National Firearms Act.”
This doesn’t say that braces will be banned, or even that they turn a pistol into an SBR, it says that the rule will make it clear WHEN a brace makes a pistol into an SBR. Maybe the language is just sloppy, but this makes me expect yet another reversal on shouldering.
georgel
Behind Every Blade of Grass
Charter Member
Benefactor
Supporting Member
Multi-Factor Enabled
My question is, if I have to serialize things, can I use the same number on all of them? It might even be the same number you use.
This is some serious bid'nus.
Brace manufacturers will be required to install cell phone linked blue tooth pressure sensors, so that when a brace is shouldered, it alerts the Automatic Transmission Fluid people who will then access your GPS coordinates and send a black helicopter to arrest you. Or maybe they will just text you a fine.
Last edited:
K, I'll try to splain.
Chemdog concerned about the following, mainly referring to 2A, I presume.
IMO, I point out that the 1st amendment has already come under attack and being eroded.
My definition of the Uniparty = like minded Ds, Rs & Bureaucrats that work in unison to Trash our BOR and constitution.
So, section 230?
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and ...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
Section 230(c) was designed to address early court decisions holding that, if an online platform restricted access to some content posted by others, it would thereby become a "publisher" of all the content posted on its site for purposes of torts such as defamation.
Big Tech has become a publisher and is enjoying 230 protection.
This has been going on for a long time and several congressional hearings have held addressing this mis-use.
Outside of holding Hearings for Theater ~ Show, nothing has been done to address this issue.
So by actions ( at this point ) it's reasonable to presume Big Gov ( > Dot Bro < ) approves of Big Tech's mis-use and by doing so, as demonstrated by Big Tech's censorship, is an Arm of our Government.
Continuing;
In my view,
The following music video ( with graphics ) represents The Uniparties Mission Creep and Dark Agenda.
Welcome to the Machine
Still confused?
Wait until Hunter Biden is cleared ~ absolved of all charges by DOJ ~ FBI.
I expect Hunter to officially be given a position in The White House, one that doesn't require confirmation.
This would still give The CCP First Hand access to The White House while also giving Dr. Jill ( bitch ) Biden access as well because I believe Traitor Joe will will voluntarily step-aside , retire for medical reasons.
That song was written in 1975 and it has taken us until 2021 to wake up!
cubrock
Swell guy
2A Bourbon Hound 2024
2A Bourbon Hound OG
Charter Life Member
Benefactor
Multi-Factor Enabled
There is no right to marry anyone enumerated in the Constitution. Marriage laws are extra-Constitutional anyway and have their origins in preventing interracial marriage. They’ve been kept around primarily to control people with tax and estate law.
You can choose right now to live and have sex with three women for the rest of your life. You can join your finances with all three and provide for legal succession of your estate to them. No one is going to sign an EO or pass a law to stop you.
Manchin says he agrees with everything Biden said and "we can't have those guns that are printed, they're undetectable." Another idoit heard from. I know, I know, he's our idiot.
It's nuts. We have a president worried about gun control where they are letting states legalize Marijuana like V.A. yesterday. You can have 4 plants at home. I'm sure know one will drive stoned like nobody drives drunk. That study won't be done. It's only gonna get worse.
However, in Washington D.C.,
District’s new police chief is rethinking unit focused on gun seizures
March 11, 2021
On Tuesday, Cmdr. John Haines, who heads the department’s Narcotics and Special Investigations Division, sent a memo to members of the Gun Recovery Unit telling them that they “must be at the forefront of change.”
The internal memo, obtained by The Washington Post and confirmed by a department spokesman as authentic, urged those officers to rethink how they do their jobs.
“The tactics of the past 10-20 years are no longer what we should be doing as a department or a city,” Haines wrote. “No longer are we focused on getting guns. The focus will be on those that pull the trigger and directly or indirectly harm others.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...ad2312-8192-11eb-ac37-4383f7709abe_story.html
So who pulls the trigger?
No, the district's (acting) chief is Robert Contee.
In the Metropolitan Police Dept. of Washington DC, a commander heads up one of the 7 districts, or a special unit, and is the equivalent of a Colonel in the military. (That's Captain for you squids since you all don't understand what a lieutenant is)
I can state, from professional experience, that what is likely to happen is they disband the gun seizure unit, then claim "Look! we are defunding the police!" and then they also say "Look! gun seizures are way down which statistically proves that crime is on the decline."
There are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics.
Police shouldn’t make policy. I presume that the gun seizure unit is only seizing illegal guns (mostly guns possessed by felons I presume) and I haven’t a clue why they would stop doing that.
Common sense gun control would involve precise enforcement of existing laws related to possession of or use of a gun during a criminal act, until they do at least that it’s clear that this is about both sides raising money and not about solving any problems.
Common sense gun control would involve precise enforcement of existing laws related to possession of or use of a gun during a criminal act, until they do at least that it’s clear that this is about both sides raising money and not about solving any problems.
I would assert that the only problem they're "solving" is us having too much of our own money.