Daniel Perry found GUILTY of murder for shooting man who pointed rifle at him during Austin BLM riot

AR10ShooterinNC

AR10ShooterinNC

Happy to be here
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2016
Messages
13,752
Location
High Point
Rating - 100%
9   0   0
thepostmillennial.com

BREAKING: Daniel Perry found GUILTY of murder for shooting man who pointed rifle at him during Austin BLM riot

Perry faced one count of murder and one count of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The jury did not find him guilty of the second charge.
thepostmillennial.com thepostmillennial.com


Greg Abbott working to 'swiftly' pardon Army Sergeant convicted of murder in Black Lives Matter riot​


www.foxnews.com

Greg Abbott working to 'swiftly' pardon Army Sergeant convicted of murder in Black Lives Matter riot

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said Saturday he is working as "swiftly" as the law allows to secure a pardon for Sgt. Daniel Perry after he was convicted of murder.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
Last edited:
Abbot may pardon him but his Army career over …

I would like to see the jury demographics his attorney allowed him to face. I can see a few liberals being sat but I just can’t see how there was not 1 hold out on that jury … especially in Texas but I guess Austin has been turned.
 
NCFubar said:
Abbot may pardon him but his Army career over …

I would like to see the jury demographics his attorney allowed him to face. I can see a few liberals being sat but I just can’t see how there was not 1 hold out on that jury … especially in Texas but I guess Austin has been turned.
Click to expand...

Austin was turned a long time ago.
 
"Foster, who was a 28-year-old white man and an Air Force veteran, had been seen openly carrying an AK-47 rifle at the time, which is legal. There are conflicting accounts as to whether Foster raised the rifle to the driver first — but seconds later Perry, who was also legally armed, shot and killed Foster and fled the area, police said. He called the police and reported what happened, claiming he shot in self defense after Foster aimed his weapon at him. Perry is also a white man."
www.texastribune.org

U.S. Army sergeant found guilty of murder in 2020 shooting of Austin protester Garrett Foster

Daniel Perry, who was driving for Uber, shot 28-year-old Foster during a protest against police brutality blocks away from the state Capitol in July 2020.
www.texastribune.org www.texastribune.org

Geez I hate that this is part of every news article, someone's race.


Also, from same article
"The indictment came one year after Texans took to the streets to protest police brutality following the murder of George Floyd, a Black man killed by a white Minneapolis police officer in May 2020."
They capitalized 'Black' in this

Also, hopefully he gets pardoned soon if his story is accurate (I remember seeing the video, was dark and hard to see the guy raise the gun to Perry's window)
 
Last edited:
barf said:
He screwed himself by sending texts saying “I might have to kill someone at work tonight” and whatever else.

Good shoot, ruined by stupid texts.
Click to expand...


I know it would have been best to not text at all. I wonder if it wold have made any difference if he would have added " in self defense" to his text.

.
 
Gator said:
I know it would have been best to not text at all. I wonder if it wold have made any difference if he would have added " in self defense" to his text.

.
Click to expand...
Looking deeper, seems they were Facebook/Social media messages. Even bigger mistake. But yes, if anything he should have mentioned being scared and fearing he would have to protect his own life. Probably how he actually felt, but wanted to sound like a badass?
 
M4gery4life said:
Because your area is getting dicey?
I mean if I was to see a mob of angry folks in my neighborhood, screaming & toting around AK’s, I might send a similar text to my family & tell them to avoid the area.
Click to expand...
I'd word it differently, nonetheless.
 
barf said:
He screwed himself by sending texts saying “I might have to kill someone at work tonight” and whatever else.

Good shoot, ruined by stupid texts.
Click to expand...
True, but the Soros DA told the Detective to exclude lots of exculpatory evidence from his testimony. Says so here...
 
MacEntyre said:
True, but the Soros DA told the Detective to exclude lots of exculpatory evidence from his testimony. Says so here...
Click to expand...
I’m no legal beagle but I have read / heard, fairly recently as a matter of fact, that are rules (statues ?) that if a prosecutor persecutor has exculpatory evidence they are required to provide it to the defense.
 
Button Pusher said:
The acceptance of a pardon imputes guilt. Is an appeal planned?
Click to expand...
You make a very valid point. An appeal with the base of prosecutorial misconduct would be a huge move … then sue the hell out of everyone he can for his future financial stability since he’s done with any chance of a normal life.
 
Stogies said:
I'd word it differently, nonetheless.
Click to expand...
that's smart, in retrospect.
when you're expecting that trouble is going to find you during your daily tasks, you may be mad enough to not think that far ahead.

I know a security guard who says law dictates that when he's on the job, he carries only his issued sidearm. the same sidearm his company says he's not allowed to practice with or really make sure even works right (he's been given broken guns before). If you pay close enough attention, you'll notice that in times of high political turmoil (e.g. trans day of vengeance) he may switch over to his personal pistol. He's also told me that he will sometimes just put his AR in his trunk as well, and worry about the legal consequences later, if it comes to that.

@NCLivingBrit thoughts?
 
MacEntyre said:
True, but the Soros DA told the Detective to exclude lots of exculpatory evidence from his testimony. Says so here...
Click to expand...
that says from the grand jury testimony. did it make it into the trial testimony or not? or was the defense not even aware that it existed because it had been pulled from the grand jury info? That's 3 different scenarios we gotta figure out
 
DrScaryGuy said:
that's smart, in retrospect.
when you're expecting that trouble is going to find you during your daily tasks, you may be mad enough to not think that far ahead.

I know a security guard who says law dictates that when he's on the job, he carries only his issued sidearm. the same sidearm his company says he's not allowed to practice with or really make sure even works right (he's been given broken guns before). If you pay close enough attention, you'll notice that in times of high political turmoil (e.g. trans day of vengeance) he may switch over to his personal pistol. He's also told me that he will sometimes just put his AR in his trunk as well, and worry about the legal consequences later, if it comes to that.

@NCLivingBrit thoughts?
Click to expand...
I'm not even allowed to touch people, if I take a pocket knife to work it's a firing offence. No guns for me alas.
 
NCLivingBrit said:
I'm not even allowed to touch people, if I take a pocket knife to work it's a firing offence. No guns for me alas.
Click to expand...
images
observe and report only?
i guess it's easier than working for a living...
 
noway2 said:
I’m no legal beagle but I have read / heard, fairly recently as a matter of fact, that are rules (statues ?) that if a prosecutor persecutor has exculpatory evidence they are required to provide it to the defense.
Click to expand...

there is what is supposed to happen, and there is what actually does happen. 😥😥
 
Welcome to the escalation in “lawfare“. As usual, the normal people are behind the curve as the communists have been working for years, if not decades to stack the system with their allies.

A while back there was a book being discussed about how to recognize the US going from banana republic to full out civil war. The book, written in the 70s (I think it was by Thomas Chittum ?) was largely focused on race, which is understandable given when it was written. One of the key red flags was race based courts and prosecution, or lack there of. I think we have a near identical to that which he warned of, but instead of race, it’s ideology.

Consider the real ramifications of a large number of normal people waking up to the realization that they can’t get a fair trial and the outcome is rigged.
 
rdinatal said:
Does a "pardon" just remove the sentencing and leaves the conviction?

Will he still have a felony mark following him?
Click to expand...
It could be either depending in the governor. Ending sentencing but leaving the conviction would traditionally be called commuting.
 
Did any blogger cover the trial. I cannot see how there was not reasonable doubt based on what was reported in the media. Was there some facts that were not widely reported, terrible defense council, etc.? Or, lord help us, was it just a jury willing to convict no matter the circumstances as we have seen a lot with prosecution where BLM is involved.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom