Particularly if you happen to carry something like a Third Gen Smith with a magazine disconnect.His 3rd reason... never thought of that.
Very compelling.His 3rd reason... never thought of that.
Since when did durham get off the list? I earned my combat action ribbon there.At some point a 'reasonableness' standard needs to be applied: at what point is enough, enough? Two mags? Three? Everyone needs to examine their own risk, and it might change from day to day.
In Durham I am OK with a single pistol, no extra mags. Go to Raleigh, I might take three mags. Fayetteville? Three guns, 12 mags, and a mortar.
To bring it to the ultimate level would you not just carry a backup gun? If the magazine could fail then so could the firing pin, or sight or disconnector...
He does however, make a compelling argument for bayonets because if your rifle goes down at least you have a spear!
I live in Fayetteville. I carry 35 rounds on a daily. It's not so badAt some point a 'reasonableness' standard needs to be applied: at what point is enough, enough? Two mags? Three? Everyone needs to examine their own risk, and it might change from day to day.
In Durham I am OK with a single pistol, no extra mags. Go to Raleigh, I might take three mags. Fayetteville? Three guns, 12 mags, and a mortar.
Never been in a gunfight. But I have seen mags drop free while shooting. I've also seen a baseplate get stripped off from crashing into a barricade when running for cover. Murphy is a M!@#$er
I never carry mags, no matter how I've tried they just don't fit my revolver
I wonder if, by boogie boys videoed logic, I should carry a half box of shells.....
$hit happens. Have a plan B.Whats the TL;DW version?
1. You might be the exception to the rule and actually need more ammoWhats the TL;DW version?