Murder Insurance?

First two words explain everything: "The NRA..."
That "they" hate the NRA enough to debase themselves with articles like this one is about the only thing keeping me paying my dues lately.
 
Last edited:
The Yahoo news service is the real looney tunes of internet media. Their delivery seems more intune for a 10th grade recipient. Of course their editors seem right off the campus of Berkeley. The Associated Press which is used by my local media is about as mediocre.
 
"The coverage kicks in if a court finds the person lawfully shot someone in self-defense or the case is dropped."

So, in the words of the article itself, it CAN'T be "murder insurance".

Besides...that's a d*mn sight better than a life insurance payout because somebody COULDN'T defend themselvez in a gun free zone or something.
 
Glade8r said:
Weren't they bitching not long about about making it a requirement to have insurance if you carry a firearm?
Click to expand...

This is yet another fine example of "no answer is good enough".

When you can see a pattern in which no answer to any question posed by an individual or group of people, then this is indicative of an individual or group of people who don't care WHAT the answer is, only that their objections overrule all else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom