Riddle me this? 115g and 124g groupings

Markshoots

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
72
Location
Bolivia
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I shoot 115g 9mm better than 124g. At 10 yards I can get 2 to 4 inch groups with no bench rest with the 115g but struggle to get a 4 to 6 inch group with 124g.

Here is the interesting part, this happens whether it's my M&P 9 2.0 compact 4", M&P shield 1.0, Taurus g2, and yes even a Glock 17. It does not matter the ammo either. It happens whether I am using cheap steel cased, mid priced range ammo and carry ammo such as Hornady,Barnes, etc.

As an experiment, I loaded 4 magazines each for the M&P and Glock (one with cheap 115g, one with Hornady 115, one with cheap 124g, and one with Hornady 124g). I shot one magazine each at 8 different targets. My son handed each magazine to me so I would not know what I was shooting at each target. Again same result, 115g had better groups than the 124g. My test guns were the M&P 9 and Glock 17 and I used a pistol rest.

I understand point of impact can be different when shooting different weight bullets out of the same pistol. I have not adjusted or zeroed the sights on any of my pistols for the 115g. I performed the "blind" experiment to see if it was just in my head.

I prefer 115g carry ammo anyway, but what is anyone's thoughts on this. My only conclusion is that all of these pistols were factory "zeroed " with 115g ammo.( if that's even a thing)
 
I shoot 115g 9mm better than 124g. At 10 yards I can get 2 to 4 inch groups with no bench rest with the 115g but struggle to get a 4 to 6 inch group with 124g.

Here is the interesting part, this happens whether it's my M&P 9 2.0 compact 4", M&P shield 1.0, Taurus g2, and yes even a Glock 17. It does not matter the ammo either. It happens whether I am using cheap steel cased, mid priced range ammo and carry ammo such as Hornady,Barnes, etc.

As an experiment, I loaded 4 magazines each for the M&P and Glock (one with cheap 115g, one with Hornady 115, one with cheap 124g, and one with Hornady 124g). I shot one magazine each at 8 different targets. My son handed each magazine to me so I would not know what I was shooting at each target. Again same result, 115g had better groups than the 124g. My test guns were the M&P 9 and Glock 17 and I used a pistol rest.

I understand point of impact can be different when shooting different weight bullets out of the same pistol. I have not adjusted or zeroed the sights on any of my pistols for the 115g. I performed the "blind" experiment to see if it was just in my head.

I prefer 115g carry ammo anyway, but what is anyone's thoughts on this. My only conclusion is that all of these pistols were factory "zeroed " with 115g ammo.( if that's even a thing)

First, eliminate some potential variables by doing bench shooting from a rest.

I'm not saying 124 gr. doesn't shoot differently, but you really need to eliminate as many factors which could affect your accuracy and consistency as possible. And bench shooting from a rest is an excellent way to do that.

Then see how you shoot, maybe at a couple different ranges such as 7 and 10 yards.
 
Last edited:
At 10 yards I doubt that it is the bullet weight which is making the difference. At 25 yards or more how the gun was zeroed would make a difference but at 10 I donā€™t think it would.
 
Last edited:
At 10 yards I doubt that it is the bullet weight which is making the difference.

In my experience, the number one suspect for shooting problems is the shooter.

Which is why I believe you need to carefully evaluate how the shooting is being conducted first, THEN move on to other things.
 
I'd get an experienced, seriously good handgunner to shoot a few of the guns and loads. And I'd increase the distance to 25 yds to get a better idea of the true accuracy of each gun & load. If I had to guess,, as to why the OP has issues,, I'd look at his shooting technique.

Lots of variables. But a true evaluation by a top shooter can easily show things to others.

I've had people bring me guns saying "they won't shoot worth a crap," only to wear out a target center at a greater distance than what they had tried. I then have them shoot & watch the way they handle the gun. Almost always,, it's the shooter,, not the gun.
 
Sounds like you switched up enough variables to leave yourself as the common denominator. Change something about your grip or trigger press technique and see if the result varies?
 
115 to 147 jump in recoil is HUGE and I see definite differences in accuracy from newer shooters based on just a few grains difference.

I can see the same for 115 to 124 for the OP
 
Back
Top Bottom