This goes back to the question whether regression bias is justified or not. I only have to be right once
.
You can be right a thousand times and wrong on the 1,001 time and it is just like I was right all along.
We won't resolve this difference, because I know the same math you do. You are right the overwhelming majority of the time. Unfortunately, that is not the issue and pointing it out over and over does not strengthen the argument.
For a paranoid prepper, for example, when silver sells off, we are not saying "oh well, we were just wrong on things." Instead we say "GREAT, I sell on the downslope and buy more when the price is lower. I have increased my stock for no more money."
We do this because YOUR constant is USD and you (I am speaking generically, I have no idea of your personal evaluations) make your evaluations of value in terms of the dollars. I live in a world where the USD is AT BEST a tenuous value, and more realistically where it is shortly to lose most-if not all- of its value. THEREFORE, I don't care about the fluctuations of fear and whether the hoarding is "justified" nor what the short term rises and falls are in the price of gold, guns, seeds, and adl items. The reason is that we view them as the "real" units of value, and dollars as irrelevant. It is all in perspective, and the perspective is determined by whether a normalcy bias is justified. I say there is far too much evidence that we are on a cliff. Time will tell if you are right.
Good luck.