Murtaugh
Well-Known Member
Why does this matter? Are you ok with them irrationally banning things and harassing people as long as certain people are grandfathered?Does this apply to already owned guns?
Why does this matter? Are you ok with them irrationally banning things and harassing people as long as certain people are grandfathered?Does this apply to already owned guns?
I’m saving this answer for Friday night after drink #5.Why does this matter? Are you ok with them irrationally banning things and harassing people as long as certain people are grandfathered?
LOL, good plan! I'll try to be hereI’m saving this answer for Friday night after drink #5.
I think they included the "statutory language" for the purpose of all the lawyers getting ready for the lawsuits just ahead. Whether they are defense lawyers or Dept of Justice lawyers. The descriptions of braces, SBRs, receivers are really going to get in the weeds real soon.I gotta think they’ll make the items more objective. I honestly believe that they posted something extra offensive so the real thing seems almost tolerable. Bottom line, they regret the statutory language, but they can’t do much about it.
Have they published a revised proposal for the points worksheet, or are we still talking about the initial one.I think they included the "statutory language" for the purpose of all the lawyers getting ready for the lawsuits just ahead. Whether they are defense lawyers or Dept of Justice lawyers. The descriptions of braces, SBRs, receivers are really going to get in the weeds real soon.
Lindsay “The Weasel” Graham is on the job!
I wrote to him about what the ATF is doing with pistol braces and 80% lowers
This means his intern wrote to them before last year and they haven't updated their form letters yet.Lindsay “The Weasel” Graham is on the job!
I wrote to him about what the ATF is doing with pistol braces and 80% lowers and this is part of the reply he sent me:
“I wrote to Attorney General Barr in my role as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee asking him to look into this matter. I also asked that he ensure that the ATF be transparent and open with firearms accessories manufacturers and the general public who utilize those accessories. I further urged the ATF to consider the impact any firearm classification they make may have on those currently utilizing the products under consideration.”
I feel so much better that he’s written to someone who’s no longer in office.
Terry
No need to do anything. Just wait until someone else gets arrested. A court case will ensue, and it will get thrown out, just like bump stocks were.So whats the deal with braced pistols?
I read a lot but it's all 'wa wa wa wa' to me. Readers Digest version?
I wouldn't be so sure about that. The existence of speakeasys and booze smuggling went off the charts in a year.I think you WAY overestimate the "will not comply" people's willingness to do more than put a sticker on their Chevy.
Most folks who shoot want to go out and shoot legally. Law-abiding citizens (by definition) obey the law.
You ,sir, are ill informed; in more ways than one...Nobody is making 80% lowers by themselves.
The new regs don't affect DIY guns.
My apologies if I misunderstood your posts upstream.Like I said…. nobody is making 80% lowers as a DIY thing.
If folks are building DIY, they are not stopping at “80%”. They are building full DIY receivers, which are not affected by this new proposed ruling.
Like I said…. nobody is making 80% lowers as a DIY thing.
If folks are building DIY, they are not stopping at “80%”. They are building full DIY receivers, which are not affected by this new proposed ruling.
I disagree with you. I think you are underestimating the American people...Like I said…. nobody is making 80% lowers as a DIY thing.
If folks are building DIY, they are not stopping at “80%”. They are building full DIY receivers, which are not affected by this new proposed ruling.
There is one true source of info. The published reg.
Would a 99% have been legal to market? If not, where was the line drawn? Who drew it? Did some manufacturer just assume that 80% would be legal while 81% would not. Did the feds offer any input on what constitutes a firearm?Yeah, the “80% thing is more of a marketing thing.
Anybody seen any updates on Matt Hoover (CRS Firearms)? I'm wondering if he's still sitting in jail or if he's out on bond or if they dropped the charges yet?
Any update?
Last I heard, he was bonded out of jail and is currently working with a defense team that includes Matt Larosiere of the FPC. Meanwhile, as far as I know, the Autokeycard guy is still locked up without bail awaiting jury trial. If only he had been accused of firing indiscriminately inside a crowded mall, then he'd be bailed out for a measly $25k.
It's best not to think about this in terms of percentages, because that's misleading and gives the impression there is some kind of official, objective metric that can be assigned to an unfinished receiver. There is no such metric, either before or after the new rule. It's a completely binary classification: something is a firearm or it isn't.Would a 99% have been legal to market? If not, where was the line drawn? Who drew it? Did some manufacturer just assume that 80% would be legal while 81% would not. Did the feds offer any input on what constitutes a firearm?
Receiver blanks that do not meet the definition of a "firearm" are not subject to regulation under the Gun Control Act (GCA). ATF has long held that items such as receiver blanks, "castings" or "machined bodies" in which the fire-control cavity area is completely solid and un-machined have not reached the "stage of manufacture" which would result in the classification of a firearm according to the GCA.
Since there is supposed to be no federal registration of non-NFA firearms, any serial number you want to put on your home made firearm should be fine and remain untraceable as long as you do not sell it through an FFL.
Now this new rule comes along to clarify everything. According to the rule, it all hinges on whether the unfinished receiver can be
"readily converted" into a finished receiver. What does "readily converted" mean, you ask? That's what everyone else would like to know also. ATF gave a list of pertinent factors like time or tools required, whether a jig is supplied, indexing/dimpling on the part, etc. But in the end, they're the only ones who can decide. As a manufacturer, all you can do is send them a sample (including any jig/tools) and see what they say. Except they don't have to say anything, and they can change their mind later anyway.
Clear as mud, eh?
If you try to fight .gov, they will keep you locked up indefinitely just to prove they can.
Sure they can, they have serialized item receipts from Bass Pro.Biden and his "Crime Posse" can not pass a background check.
Biden and his Marxist cohorts have gotten us into this decline in American Society because they have been ,( and still are ) engaged in destroying "The Nuclear Family."
Sure they can, they have serialized item receipts from Bass Pro.
2022 Monthly Child Rapes by Illegal Aliens
3) March 2022 30 illegal aliens arrested for 110 child rape/child sexual assault charges in NC here
2) February 2022 27 illegal aliens arrested for 84 child rape/child sexual assault charges in NC here
1) January 2022 18 illegal aliens arrested for 96 child rape/child sexual assault charges in NC here
Handyman charged with stabbing Queens lover is illegal alien
Handyman charged with stabbing Queens lover is illegal alien
The knife-wielding handyman accused of stabbing his married lover dozens of times during a lethal late-night fight inside her Queens home was living illegally in the U.S., immigration officials said Friday. David Bonola, held in custody after a Thursday night court appearance in Queens, was...www.gopusa.com
High Point University student came to NC to get guns
Steber was in possession of a Star Super Modelo 9mm and a Brownson, Slucom, and Hopkins percussion shotgun.
High Point University student came to NC to get guns, planned campus shooting since last December, district attorney says
HIGH POINT, N.C. — New details emerged in court after police discovered that a High Point University student had a “plan and timeline to kill people,” court documents say. Documents sta…myfox8.com
Can you prove the High Point student didn't have a qualifying receipt for a firearm or serialized item?Yes Sir,
So you're continuing to troll me, at least quote me properly.
View attachment 465930
https://carolinafirearmsforum.com/index.php?threads/sks.112425/post-1873261
In-light of the continuing "Open Borders," and the way you continue to behave I'm sure you are right there with giving them all firearms.
Here's more customers from The Replacement Citizens group.
Here's one,
Here's one that got firearms as a Freeman from a Freeman.
Who supplied them?
It's my prerogative to list firearms as I see fit.
It's also your prerogative to disagree.
I am not going to apologize for NOT agreeing your give them all guns mindset.
Matter of fact, you and yours interjected mass disapproval on how I listed the rifle, First.
Perhaps I should have asked for permission first, or not.
Now go back to your zoom meetings & Report to your handler. View attachment 465936
View attachment 465949
Can you prove the High Point student didn't have a qualifying receipt for a firearm or serialized item?
Documents state that Paul Arnold Steber, 19, from Boston, Massachusetts
Steber was in possession of a Star Super Modelo 9mm and a Brownson, Slucom, and Hopkins percussion shotgun.
High Point University student came to NC to get guns, planned campus shooting since last December, district attorney says
HIGH POINT, N.C. — New details emerged in court after police discovered that a High Point University student had a “plan and timeline to kill people,” court documents say. Documents sta…myfox8.com