I'm thinking Biden and his controllers are the ones that need to back off.Thought we already had a thread on this one?
Im really hoping that, for some reason, Putin will back down.
But, ultimately, we just not need be involved.
It’s a lot like the Cuban missile crisis in reverse. Russia doesn’t want US/Nato near Moscow. I can’t blame them on that aspect. It’s all a big mess for sure. We are being projected as weak with Corn Pop in office and well, we are weak
History shows that Soviet/ Russian border aggression goes back 60-70 years in the modern era. What is tell tale is that when the US and its allies get bogged down in international conflicts, i.e. Vietnam, the Soviets did things like jumping into the Castro-Cuba-US standoff and invading Czech a few years later. They have been fighting with the Chechians, provided nuclear technology to the Ayatollahs, got involved in Syria while we had our hands full in Iraq/Afghan. This is just another chapter added to Russia testing the US resolve of being a super-power. Of course Putin would like Russia to reclaim some of their old standing, although their economy won't support anything but some artillery attacks and maybe assasinations of political leaders inside Ukraine.
What folks should keep an eye on, and it's been talked about here a lot, is how does China take advantage of the US standoff with Putin. An Army vet I talked to yesterday, thinks China is eyeing a tactical move against Japan while we're least expecting it. That is problematic because our leaders have an untimely admiration of the leaders in Beijing.
It’s not like they still don’t have a nuclear submarine parked off our eastern coast anyways. I guess it just makes it easier for the politicians that it is submerged. We have our SSBN boats doing the same.Same with Turkey having US nukes and them putting nukes in Cuba. I never really understood why we felt moral and ignoration for them putting nuclear weapons in Cuba when we had them in Turkey and Western Europe.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, we should have allowed the then-new Russia to join NATO and present a united front to China. But, no, we had to maintain an enemy to the immediate east of Europe to justify military spending.I am torn on this one. As some may not know, when the Soviet Union collapsed the West made a deal with Russia and gave assurances that there would not be an eastward expansion of Nato in exchange for collecting and securing the Soviet Nukes. Now more than half a dozen former Eastern States have joined Nato and the Ukraine as an immediate neighbor to Russia wants in as well. That does not make annexing territory right but I can see why Russia feels pushed against the wall and played by the West.
That would have realistically and with hindsight the better choice. Russia is no fairy land but we had worse allies.After the collapse of the Soviet Union, we should have allowed the then-new Russia to join NATO and present a united front to China. But, no, we had to maintain an enemy to the immediate east of Europe to justify military spending.
Nope we sure ain’t. We can be the neutral guys by minding our own business but we won’t. Ukraine is not a NATO nation. They had their chance to do so and never did so it’s too late now that Putin is knocking at the border. We are stirring a hornets nest or poking the bear on this one. When we get stung or we get bitten it’s no one but our leaders own fault. Sadly the ones causing this issue will never be the ones to face the consequencesThe Evil and Malevolence of the Pentagon’s Brilliant Strategy in Ukraine - LewRockwell
The crisis in Ukraine demonstrates the sheer brilliance of Pentagon strategists. Yes, granted, it’s an evil and malevolent strategy, but nonetheless one cannot help but admire it for its sheer ingenuity. The strategy has involved maneuvering Russia into having to make a choice between two...www.lewrockwell.com
“We” are not the good guys. Let that sink in.
Spectrum news was repeating this about 5pm or so.This just in on Agenda Free News
Well the closing ceremonies of the chicom olympics is rolling... View attachment 440833
Interesting article, but I'm not buying the part about Roosevelt's Japanese oil blockade being used as an excuse to get the US into the European war. That is a non-sequitur, it makes no sense. The article does make some very good points about the US foreign policy establishment and how they use "Russia bad" as an excuse to keep their funding intact, and Biden has been part of the Washington establishment so long he (or his puppeteers) they actually believe this is how things are supposed to be.The Evil and Malevolence of the Pentagon’s Brilliant Strategy in Ukraine - LewRockwell
The crisis in Ukraine demonstrates the sheer brilliance of Pentagon strategists. Yes, granted, it’s an evil and malevolent strategy, but nonetheless one cannot help but admire it for its sheer ingenuity. The strategy has involved maneuvering Russia into having to make a choice between two...www.lewrockwell.com
“We” are not the good guys. Let that sink in.
Bingo. The Russians consider this to be a vital national interest and to them it is worth fighting for. Just like we would have gone to war over missiles in Cuba.Same with Turkey having US nukes and them putting nukes in Cuba.
The CIA and all the foreign policy establishment are all Russia experts. They all speak Russian. They have no chops for managing conflict with China, so they have to keep fomenting conflict with Russia to keep their nice cushy jobs.
Damn good info in this post. You provide the whole US with this info and it proves the government and media has been pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes for a long time. The military machine needs villains to feed the kingdom building. Without villains there are fewer promotions and for certain no need for more funding.Interesting article, but I'm not buying the part about Roosevelt's Japanese oil blockade being used as an excuse to get the US into the European war. That is a non-sequitur, it makes no sense. The article does make some very good points about the US foreign policy establishment and how they use "Russia bad" as an excuse to keep their funding intact, and Biden has been part of the Washington establishment so long he (or his puppeteers) they actually believe this is how things are supposed to be.
I ran across this on another site and I think this is pretty close to the truth.
Richard Weyand
All this talk about Russia and Ukraine drives me nuts. 'What's Putin going to do?' everyone asks.
Nobody mentions any history. So let's fix that, shall we?
In the 1600s and 1700s, the Khanate of Crimea, nominally part of Turkey, was raiding Russian villages for blond-haired, blue-eyed sex slaves. As a result of the Russian-Turkish War, Russia annexed Crimea and cleaned out the slave trade. That was in 1783. They built a naval base there, and established a city, Sevastopol, to service the naval base.
Yes, Russian ownership of Crimea is older than the U.S. Constitution.
Sevastopol is also the only reliably ice-free naval base the Russians have that is contiguous to Russia. As late as 1953, Crimea was part of the Russian RSFS of the Soviet Union. See map below from 1949.
In 1953, Stalin died. He had starved Ukraine when a Ukraine separatist movement became troublesome, killing millions. Khrushchev, who grew up in Ukraine, transferred control of Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR, a part of the USSR, as a peace offering in 1954. This was an administrative change, like making the UP of Michigan part of Wisconsin. Still part of the USSR, so who cares.
When the USSR came apart in 1991, Ukraine left and took Crimea with it. Now remember, it is the only reliably ice-free port the Russian Navy has that is contiguous to Russia. But Ukraine was a Russian puppet state, so no problem.
Then the Orange Revolution in Ukraine put in place a pro-Western government. It has been alleged the CIA helped foment and support this revolt. We started making noises then about making Ukraine a member of NATO, a military alliance specifically aimed at fighting the USSR if it ever came to blows over there.
Russia's only ice-free naval base going to NATO? Putin said "Uh, no," and annexed Crimea back to Russia. Big surprise, huh? Nope. I saw it coming. When the Orange Revolution succeeded, the first thing I said was, "What about Crimea? That's going to be serious trouble."
All Ukraine has to do to have peace with Russia is cede Crimea back to Russia where it belongs. The people living in Crimea are not Ukrainians. They are Russians. If Ukraine officially gave Crimea back to Russia (like someone's fiance giving the ring back when they break off the relationship), and guaranteed access, there would be no problem.
We should propose it, but we won't. The CIA and all the foreign policy establishment are all Russia experts. They all speak Russian. They have no chops for managing conflict with China, so they have to keep fomenting conflict with Russia to keep their nice cushy jobs.
And the Ukrainian government, under CIA influence, is being little bitches about it. Russia will never give up Crimea. And if Ukraine insists, they're going to keep getting curb-stomped by the Bear.
The stupidest thing is that nobody cares except the government people. The Ukrainian citizens don't care about Crimea. It's a bunch of Russians living there, not Ukrainians.That's what's really going on between Ukraine and Russia, and nobody talks about it. It's all "Putin bad" bullshit.
View attachment 440857
(me) Let the damn Russians have Crimea, quit making noises about expanding NATO into Ukraine and stay the hell out of other people's business.
Bingo. The Russians consider this to be a vital national interest and to them it is worth fighting for. Just like we would have gone to war over missiles in Cuba.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, we should have allowed the then-new Russia to join NATO and present a united front to China. But, no, we had to maintain an enemy to the immediate east of Europe to justify military spending.
Military budget is blown. New expenditures, travel, and training shut down. Inflation killed the fiscal budget as told to my son. I saw today on the news Biden is requesting more money.
In the 1980s there was a plethora of Russian studies programs in universities, and learning Russian was the big thing. Hell, I did it, at ECU.
Then the Soviet Union collapsed and we had all these experts who could speak Russian and no one needed them anymore.
But Chinese has been a significant language need for the US since the 1920s, but the need has waxed and wanted. It really took off in the '70s when Nixon established relationship with China. There are a metric crap ton of people in foreign service and for most of the government and in the military who can speak Chinese. That has always been a Priority.
At this stage, it's not our circus and not our monkeys. We really need to stay out of it, but no. Thank you, oh great Star Chamber for your illustrious wisdom and benevolence.The Donesk And Luhansk “states” are only occupying about half of their “state” and I would venture a bet, Russia goes into their area and helps push the Ukrainian army out of their area and when the army of Ukraine fights back, they will declare War on Ukraine and commence to taking in the whole thing
She’s been known to blow a few.Biden sent the witch to fix this.
we are in trouble.
the end of civilization is approaching.