Do you want to share your sources with the rest of the class?No body cams, from what I've read.
Do you want to share your sources with the rest of the class?No body cams, from what I've read.
On the lighter side. Yeah, my experience in doing deliveries reflect yours. Went into one, nice, neighborhood and you couldn't see addresses anywhere. I remember thinking, I hope no one here has to call 911.Ummm...nooooo...
That may happen with SOME customers, but I can tell you for a certainty from my own experience as a pizza delivery guy years ago that this is NOT the norm.
You have a name. You have an address. You have a phone number. And on one wall of the pizza delivery joints I worked, you had a paper map.
The police are AT LEAST as high tech as that.
As someone else said earlier...this ain't rocket science. The police spend a HUGE amount of their time driving from one location to another. They have the experience. "Someone didn't take the time to analyze the address" is so pitiful it doesn't even reach the level of an excuse. "Incredibly tragic" doesn't even BEGIN to describe the this.
The level of incompetency here is truly epic.
On the lighter side. Yeah, my experience in doing deliveries reflect yours. Went into one, nice, neighborhood and you couldn't see addresses anywhere. I remember thinking, I hope no one here has to call 911.
It was 36ft from the wrong door to the right one. It was a trailer park. And apparently the correct door had a large P on it for Pearman, the suspect they were looking for.
And serving a warrant at almost midnight on a Sunday? Unless the person named was really ducking it that aint exactly a normal time.
This reminds me of another thread. Wrong address, homeowner shot.
A different time and place, but the same response from you.
@B00ger have you silenced the crickets yet?
Typical response from JR, the police never do wrong in his eyes.This reminds me of another thread. Wrong address, homeowner shot.
A different time and place, but the same response from you.
@B00ger have you silenced the crickets yet?
Did they lie about being at the wrong address? If not why would their credibility be in question?
Again, I say do you think the police never encountered a man holding a gun before without shooting him? It took a deal more than him just having a gun to get shot.
Why would you think that I would be OK with speeding cops? Have I ever made the slightest statement that would make you believe that I think Cops were above the law? You're going to need to show your work here.@jrgreen so if a police man out of his district passes you going 100 + mph with no lights or siren on and no reason to be speeding that fast, is that ok? Do you report him on it? What if same officer pulls you later for speeding? I merely ask because LEO's are held to the same laws as every other plain citizen. They should take their job and realizability seriously and many do but there are some that do not. Yes the job allows them to take the very freedoms away from the criminal element and protect the innocent. That being said if you knocked on the wrong door say @B00ger 's door at 2 am and he answered the door with a gun and you shot him would you get a free pass??
Did that homeowner also point a gun at police? Then yes my response would be the same. I don't have situational ethics.This reminds me of another thread. Wrong address, homeowner shot.
A different time and place, but the same response from you.
@B00ger have you silenced the crickets yet?
So it's OK for people to point guns at you then? It would be a crime for you to defend yourself too? Or do cops not have the same rights as you?I think the crime was the shooting, not the knocking.
I'm supposed to live on this site? I got stuff to do.Your last response was the homeowner "probably" pointed a gun. Then you dropped off the planet.
like I said there could have been any number of reasons to knock at that door, the resident's response is what called the play.Yes, they are entitled to the same right of self preservation.
What I'm not OK with is being at the wrong house and things going sideways. There is no excuse for that IMO, ever.
Someone comes pounding on my door at midnight , I damn well am going to have a gun in my hand if I choose to answer. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't just knock and go away if I decided just to roll over and pull a pillow over my head.
When people call for a pizza they want you to find them, so they give good directions, people ducking warrants, not so much.
If you're insane enough to believe the police just shot some random guy through the door you are wasting your time.The claim they are making is he pointing a gun and yet they shot through the door?
"Linares said her husband went to the door to see what was happening outside. That's when she heard gunshots and by the time she reached her husband, he was already dead.
"Bullet holes suggest they shot through the door," Wells said."
B00ger is exactly right. I hesitated wasting my breath on you yet again but I was foolish.
If you're insane enough to believe the police just shot some random guy through the door you are wasting your time.
Well yes, my understanding of NC law is that it is okay for someone to point (and fire) a gun at me if I am presenting them with a threat of death or great bodily harm.So it's OK for people to point guns at you then? It would be a crime for you to defend yourself too? Or do cops not have the same rights as you?
1. The cops weren't trespassing.At two am, the cops were trespassing by being at the wrong place, the guy answered the door with a gun, he was killed by the cops. Their mistake in not confirming the address cost the man his life.he was dong what wrong???? At what point does someone need to be held accountable for the mans death? Is it ok to allow Pd to skate by with an oops ? Such as with my speeding example, they usually don't police each other so they get a free pass, it begins to develop a mentality to some that they are above the law:
Are you saying that by knocking on the guys door the police were presenting the guy with the threat of death or great bodily harm?Well yes, my understanding of NC law is that it is okay for someone to point (and fire) a gun at me if I am presenting them with a threat of death or great bodily harm.
And yes, it would be a crime for me to 'defend' myself because I was the instigator.
Is my understanding of the law incorrect?
If officers have the same rights as me (and it seems they actually have more) then shouldn't they have the same accountability as me?
Are you saying that by knocking on the guys door the police were presenting the guy with the threat of death or great bodily harm?
I think you have it backwards. The guy pointing the gun at them was the threat. I'm going to let you guys have this thread because logic seems to have no effect on your opinions.
I'm going to let you guys have this thread because logic seems to have no effect on your opinions.
And even if he did come to the door pointing a gun at them they are still guilty of murder.What's more likely, they shot an unarmed man for no reason?, Or the guy did come to the door pointing a gun?
Well, if they are on official business to arrest someone, but go to the wrong house, invading the innocent homeowners curtilage to affect an improper arrest, I would call that trespassing. Everything after that follows from that first offense.1. The cops weren't trespassing.
2. Their mistake cost the man nothing. His actions cost him his life.
3. Police police other police all the time. How else would you ever know when one did wrong?
4. The mentality that some are above the law exists only in your, and a few other, fevered minds. Minds that can easily ignore logic and common sense.
1. The cops weren't trespassing.
2. Their mistake cost the man nothing. His actions cost him his life.
3. Police police other police all the time. How else would you ever know when one did wrong?
4. The mentality that some are above the law exists only in your, and a few other, fevered minds. Minds that can easily ignore logic and common sense.
Now it was you who brought common sense into this conversation, and you didn't answer my question:
Would you agree that it is common sense for police to anticipate that an innocent homeowner might come to the door armed when they are summoned to the door in the night?.
The fact that they shot him.
Lots of conflicting info now. Attorneys hired a private investigaton firm to look at the scene and surmise the door was closed when the rounds stuck it. Yet, there was supposedly a dog that ran out and "attacked" the officers. How did he get out if the door was closed? According to police accounts I've read, an officer saw a gun pointing out the door, but none have said it was pointed at an officer. There is an account that the occupant looked out the window and saw police cars. If he saw police cars or if he heard them announce "POLICE!" why would answer the door armed? A reasonable man wouldn't do that much less point a gun at them, right? He wasn't guilty of anything. Unless, he thought it was ICE and they were coming to deport him.
Another interesting question is exactly at what point did the police realize they were at the wrong house? Because, presumably, up through securing the scene, after the shooting, they thought they had bagged their suspect. He was still presumed to be the bad guy. At what point were the accounts told, before or after the discovery of the wrong address?