The NSA and ATF keep it on file.we need a section for all banned members that includes their username, aliases and general summary of their offenses
Yeah I’ve noticed a few banned members try and join back. But it’s so obvious and their IP address would give them away.I also think a lot of banned folks are the previously banned who sneak back in, but their IP, MO, or BO gives them away.
This is it. This is the logical statement IMO. This works. I could see a quick "who, what and why" public post by mods to cut back on user questions, but any sort of public comment capacity would quickly devolve into absolute cringe.Meh…if it was at all open as a discussion forum it would devolve nearly immediately into a massive dumpster fire of haters and lovers throwing shade everywhere.
I do think it would be nice to have a sticky somewhere with a list of banned folks and their offense. Mainly because sometimes people get the heave-Ho and it’s a complete mystery which just leads to more discussion and drama. A simple:
B00ger
Offense: annoying obnoxious git
Mitigation attempts: multiple mod warnings due to Troll posts, illogical ranting, and general douchebaggery
Ban date: 1/12/22
Eligible for return: no
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here’s how I know how old I was when this show was on TV.
I like this idea. Locked thread with names we no longer speak. Make it really spicy and open the thread on Friday at Beer:30, lock it back at midnight and add new names accordingly. 😁Meh…if it was at all open as a discussion forum it would devolve nearly immediately into a massive dumpster fire of haters and lovers throwing shade everywhere.
I do think it would be nice to have a sticky somewhere with a list of banned folks and their offense. Mainly because sometimes people get the heave-Ho and it’s a complete mystery which just leads to more discussion and drama. A simple:
B00ger
Offense: annoying obnoxious git
Mitigation attempts: multiple mod warnings due to Troll posts, illogical ranting, and general douchebaggery
Ban date: 1/12/22
Eligible for return: no
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That last line is probably armslists motto.Like this too and I think we should put it in the Members Only section so you have to pay to find out . Wanna play gotta pay
It’s $20 a year to keep the lights on here. This is not a commercial enterprise.That last line is probably armslists motto.
I’m kidding Lol, I was thinking about becoming a supporting member because this forum has done alot for me and I’ve met some of my closest friends here, how would I go about doing that?It’s $20 a year to keep the lights on here. This is not a commercial enterprise.
You don’t have to pony up, plenty don’t, but for those who do, there are a few perks with the deal.
Do you get banned for using “retard”?? I think that is now a banned word.Man, the natives are restless. I think it would open a smelly can of worms to post all that.
Most folks that get the heave ho just push and push, brick by brick. They don’t rock along playing nice with others, and all of a sudden go full retard. Although it has happened recently. I expect after the mods hafta argue with each other for the eleventieth time about someone's boorish behavior they get fed up, and the next misdemeanor finally gets the boor tossed out.
No. Only for being one.Do you get banned for using “retard”?? I think that is now a banned word.
You might…Do you get banned for using “retard”?? I think that is now a banned word.
Nah. But you get banned after you check a minimum amount of boxes….Do you get banned for using “retard”?? I think that is now a banned word.
@AlexIt’s $20 a year to keep the lights on here. This is not a commercial enterprise.
You don’t have to pony up, plenty don’t, but for those who do, there are a few perks with the deal.
I also think a lot of banned folks are the previously banned who sneak back in, but their IP, MO, or BO gives them away.
Why make more work for those that wear the sash?