"Public Opinion"Does the Court of Public Opinion count?
Aka,
Vigilantes, Mobs.
"Public Opinion"Does the Court of Public Opinion count?
But can you give an example that demonstrates that assertion, where someone was not charged for not having a BOS??!? 🤣You can't violate laws that don't exist.
I always shown I have never gave them the permit to keepOk I’ve tried searching and can’t seem to find the answer. When someone is purchasing a pistol from a from a private selling. Does the original PPP need to be given to the seller or is it just shown. Looking for the actual law and not what you do 🤷🏽
But do you have to have a meringue transfer permit before you hand someone a slice of pie? And is cool whip a short process meringue or does it have to take at least 26 minutes overall?It’s worse than meringue versus cool whip.
Yes… when being tried by jury.. the public opinion counts 16-23 on a grand jury and 12 on a criminal. 🙂Does the Court of Public Opinion count?
I am pretty sure this pertains to sales by FFLs, not private sellers.The ambiguity of the statute is amazing and intentionally vague. Tossing in items that are not definitive creates doubt, which may make it feel too cumbersome for some and artificially creates a deterrent. It also leaves a door open for the state in the event of crime or as a way to potentially indict / hold…. Thus bringing on an expensive (for you) round of legal fisticuffs btwn your lawyer and the DA. I feel it could be easily remedied by changing wording or adding definitive statements. Ex: the verbiage about “obtaining”… this leads one to potentially believe.. 1) the purchaser needs to obtain said permit from sheriff and 2) it also implies that the seller must “obtain”, which promotes thoughts on retention. If it were to say, the seller must “view” the permit, to confirm validity, that would clarify. Also, if “obtained” is true, what is the retention period”, as mention by a previous post. Is there a definitive period or is it based on a personal CYA period? If it were meant to be absolute in definition, it would would more closely resemble the verbiage in place for FFLs.. example below
View attachment 559428
The only place it has ever said that a private seller “should” (not “must”) retain the buyer’s PPP, is in Roy Cooper’s, and subsequent guidance to sheriffs. It was also stated that this was his “interpretation”. The reality is, it is simply not stated in any sort of express fashion anywhere in the statutes that I am aware of.
@Langley said, "Looking for the actual law and not what you do."
This is the Topic That Keeps On Giving! 🤣 🤣 🤣
The intent of your comment is correct, but to nit pic, the buyer’s obligation is to obtain a valid PPP or CHP prior to taking possession. If he or she does not display or present it to a private seller, no law has been broken. See https://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByArticle/Chapter_14/Article_52A.pdfAll the buyer has to do is display/present the PPP. It is not required to be transferred or kept by the seller.
What’s unusual is that someone brought up this thread instead of starting a new one.DAMMIT!
And we had just made it past two months, too!
😆