Rittenhouse self defense analysis

One thing I have not seen is the condemnation of the skateboard and bicep guys for being vigilantes. Lots of people are calling KR a vigilante, but drop kick man, skateboard moron, and lefty were all trying to kill KR based on someone shouting that he had shot someone. They were trying to take the law into their own hands even though LEO were visible down the street. KR was just trying to defend himself against those vigilantes and actually sought out LEO. If vigilantes are evil in the eyes of the libs/commie/maggots, the rioters who attacked the Kid should be evil in their eyes. Not going to happen. Lib/commie/maggots have no shame and very little use for the truth. I include most of the MSM in that cesspool of commie/liberal/maggots. They belong there.
 
One thing I have not seen is the condemnation of the skateboard and bicep guys for being vigilantes. Lots of people are calling KR a vigilante, but drop kick man, skateboard moron, and lefty were all trying to kill KR based on someone shouting that he had shot someone. They were trying to take the law into their own hands even though LEO were visible down the street. KR was just trying to defend himself against those vigilantes and actually sought out LEO. If vigilantes are evil in the eyes of the libs/commie/maggots, the rioters who attacked the Kid should be evil in their eyes. Not going to happen. Lib/commie/maggots have no shame and very little use for the truth. I include most of the MSM in that cesspool of commie/liberal/maggots. They belong there.
Still don’t get how people are defending a pedophile who was calling people the N word at a BLM “protest”. Calling him a victim. He’s a victimizer.
 
One thing I have not seen is the condemnation of the skateboard and bicep guys for being vigilantes. Lots of people are calling KR a vigilante, but drop kick man, skateboard moron, and lefty were all trying to kill KR based on someone shouting that he had shot someone. They were trying to take the law into their own hands even though LEO were visible down the street. KR was just trying to defend himself against those vigilantes and actually sought out LEO. If vigilantes are evil in the eyes of the libs/commie/maggots, the rioters who attacked the Kid should be evil in their eyes. Not going to happen. Lib/commie/maggots have no shame and very little use for the truth. I include most of the MSM in that cesspool of commie/liberal/maggots. They belong there.
then you weren't watching the prosecution's closing argument
that's EXACTLY what he said.
He said kyle was wrong for going in as a vigilante, but called the mob heroes for rushing in to stop an armed kid who was shooting people all willynilly
 
Rittenhouse did nothing wrong, and I have no patience for "conservatives" wailing that he somehow shouldn't have been there, simply because they would be too afraid to do the same thing. Such comments are a naked attempt to mask their cowardly outlook on life with a twisted, unearned sense of moral superiority, as if not doing anything and watching your city burn is somehow the virtuous path. It is disgusting.

If you consult the widely-available writings of those who founded this country, it will become abundantly clear that those men would have fully supported (and expected!) a young, able-bodied man defending the wider community in the face of mass violence and criminality. In case it wasn't already obvious from the footage, Kyle and those like him were the only force standing between violent anarchists and the innocent people of Kenosha that night, while a bunch of donut-eaters sat there in their armored tanks watching the city burn down (heaven forbid they actually do their jobs, or else they might lose their pensions, which, I might add, are paid for by the people whose businesses were burning). Kyle did not hunt and attempt to arrest/execute these scumbags. They attacked him in places where he had a right to be.

This country exists to empower the individual who is of good moral character in doing what is right, not to restrict his movements with the goal of aiding pedophiles, arsonists, and thieves. Kyle is an American citizen, and he has the right to be on any American street, armed to the teeth with whatever he feels is appropriate. Thank God he chose a rifle and not pepper spray, or he wouldn't be alive today.
 
Last edited:
Kyle needs to keep to himself because he can STILL be sued in civil court.

Yes, Wisconsin has it written into the laws that an acquittal in criminal court is a defense against civil liability. But that doesn't mean he can't be sued at all in civil court.

He needs to keep his mouth shut on this matter and disappear from the limelight. If he's going to go after MSM outlets like Sandmann, then he needs attorneys for that and NOT to go around blabbing ANYTHING to the media until it's all said and done.

And even then, he should stay out of the limelight.
 
Kyle needs to keep to himself because he can STILL be sued in civil court.

Yes, Wisconsin has it written into the laws that an acquittal in criminal court is a defense against civil liability. But that doesn't mean he can't be sued at all in civil court.

He needs to keep his mouth shut on this matter and disappear from the limelight. If he's going to go after MSM outlets like Sandmann, then he needs attorneys for that and NOT to go around blabbing ANYTHING to the media until it's all said and done.

And even then, he should stay out of the limelight.
I'm pretty sure the strategy now is to get paid for interviews.
I got an email from Conservative Review that was a letter from Kyle's mom asking for crowd funding support to cover legal expenses and all excess funds dedicated to Kyle to go to college.
 
then you weren't watching the prosecution's closing argument
that's EXACTLY what he said.
He said kyle was wrong for going in as a vigilante, but called the mob heroes for rushing in to stop an armed kid who was shooting people all willynilly
I did not listen, but from what you said, the prosecutor called KR a vigilante rather than labeling the real vigilantes, the rioters who tried to kill KR, as vigilantes. He, like about every other lib/commie/maggot, got it backwards. Meanings of words seem just not to matter to them if they can use a word incorrectly to help them tell lies.
 
883a6eb3edc88e91a47f45a199769043.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
One thing I have not seen is the condemnation of the skateboard and bicep guys for being vigilantes. Lots of people are calling KR a vigilante, but drop kick man, skateboard moron, and lefty were all trying to kill KR based on someone shouting that he had shot someone. They were trying to take the law into their own hands even though LEO were visible down the street. KR was just trying to defend himself against those vigilantes and actually sought out LEO. If vigilantes are evil in the eyes of the libs/commie/maggots, the rioters who attacked the Kid should be evil in their eyes. Not going to happen. Lib/commie/maggots have no shame and very little use for the truth. I include most of the MSM in that cesspool of commie/liberal/maggots. They belong there.
Isn't the whole Antifa/BLM/CRT movement vigilantism anyway?
 
Last edited:
Yes, Wisconsin has it written into the laws that an acquittal in criminal court is a defense against civil liability. But that doesn't mean he can't be sued at all in civil court.

Huh?!? I thought Civil Court was to determine any civil liability. What about the acquittal? Isn't that a defense against civil liability??

Call me confused.
 
keyboard commandos or not, some of you guys make me feel bad about myself.
i don't have a stake in a car lot... but i know i've showed up at other places armed and bringing guns to share, so i really shouldn't think kyle was out of line
 
Doesn’t it make the bullet go faster? Using the forward assist converts a bullet, which would otherwise bounce off the target, into a penetrating killer. 🤔
Using the forward assist also punches a hole in the bullet, making it a hollow point, which will explode on impact.
 
Still don’t get how people are defending a pedophile who was calling people the N word at a BLM “protest”. Calling him a victim. He’s a victimizer.
Remember that it is not about race but about behavior. A light skinned maggot of European ancestry taunting a brave young White boy with the "N" word fits the pattern. Creepy Joe saying that you are not black if you do not vote for him fits the narrative. Black conservatives being mocked as not being black enough or being labeled Uncle Toms fits the narrative. Slick Willy being called the first black president fits the narrative. Most of the BLM rioters in some places being light skinned women of European ancestry fits the narrative. They are betting heavily on the power of the race card by associating the behavior they promote to one race so that anybody who does not agree with them can be called a racist. They are evil people and have a powerful tool that they have used very successfully to get their way. Their other very effective tool they use is the promotion of the various sexual practices and lifestyles. You are labeled as a sexist bigot if you do not welcome the latest sexual lifestyle they thrust into the public eye.

As has been said earlier, once they get their way, the useful idiots will be brushed aside
 
Huh?!? I thought Civil Court was to determine any civil liability. What about the acquittal? Isn't that a defense against civil liability??

Call me confused.

I'm confused, too. But I ain't no attorney, so...
 
Remember that it is not about race but about behavior. A light skinned maggot of European ancestry taunting a brave young White boy with the "N" word fits the pattern
Speaking of that word that begins with the letter N, consider the fact that "they" use it regularly and with impunity, yet normal people are supposed to act like it is so vile that it's mere utterance is grounds for being shunned from society. WHY do we give them that power? Why do we treat that word, that they throw about wantonly with such reverence and fear? Instead we should be making the word powerless and common (vulgar), so common that it loses all meaning.

As you said, it's about BEHAVIOR and the manner in which they use it is about behavior, which should be obvious when they commonly refer to non blacks with that term.
 
Last edited:
Huh?!? I thought Civil Court was to determine any civil liability. What about the acquittal? Isn't that a defense against civil liability??

Call me confused.

A person may employ deadly force against another, if the person reasonably believes that force is necessary to protect a 3rd-person or one's self from imminent death or great bodily harm, without incurring civil liability for injury to the other. Clark v. Ziedonis, 513 F.2d 79 (1975).


This is the section I cited before on this subject.

I suspect that the reason the attorneys who responded to my comment in another forum said he could still be sued is because the statute doesn't say that an acquittal in criminal court confers immunity in civil court. Which means a person could still be sued in civil court, where the merits of the circumstances would then be judged by civil standards... which is by the "preponderance of evidence" and not "beyond a reasonable doubt".

This is why I believe Kyle needs to keep his mouth shut when it comes to communicating with the MSM.
 
Last edited:
WHY do we give them that power?
Many people do not want to be thought of as being racist and have bought into the White-guilt narrative. They are overly eager to demonstrate that they do not have any racist tendencies and go way overboard. People who seem not to be proud of themselves and their race have been very successful in convincing way too many White people that they should be ashamed of their race. Just think of all the statues that have come down. They have even started taking down Jefferson, Washington, Teddy Roosevelt, and Columbus

You do not see too many statues of FDR coming down because he had a bunch of Americans of Japanese ancestry put in camps during WWII. The Japanese are not ashamed of their race.
 


Looks like Dominic Black is getting an amazing plea deal, just a civil citation.
I feel bad for the kid, forced to testify against his friend, and toe the line between non incriminating himself and not stabbing his friend in the back.

Rickeita mentions in the video that they're still friends, which is good to hear.
 


Looks like Dominic Black is getting an amazing plea deal, just a civil citation.
I feel bad for the kid, forced to testify against his friend, and toe the line between non incriminating himself and not stabbing his friend in the back.

Rickeita mentions in the video that they're still friends, which is good to hear.

It's a favorable outcome & I'm glad it worked out that way.

Tough position to be in but I watched his testimony during the trial (on the Rekieta stream) and he did a very good job. It did not hurt Kyle's case.
 
Looks like Dominic Black is getting an amazing plea deal, just a civil citation.
I feel bad for the kid, forced to testify against his friend, and toe the line between non incriminating himself and not stabbing his friend in the back.

Rickeita mentions in the video that they're still friends, which is good to hear.

Civil is good. Criminal is bad.

This is an awesome deal for him and I'm glad it went this way.
 
Back
Top Bottom